Re: Apache Portable Runtime artifacts

2008-11-08 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Nov 8, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Max Bowsher wrote: André Malo wrote: * Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Nov 8, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Max Bowsher wrote: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I would like to publish the APR artifacts into the Maven repository, [1]. I think that the group id should be org.apache.apr and

Re: Default plugin execution id

2008-11-08 Thread Christian Schulte
Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > However, given that POM snippets without execution id like > > > foo > >run > > > > might not be uncommon, i.e. where one doesn't care about the execution > id and simply relies on the schema-provided default value, it seems > advisabl

Re: Default plugin execution id

2008-11-08 Thread Christian Schulte
Jason van Zyl wrote: > I don't think anyone is generally going to type: > > default-execution-id > > It says what it is and if someone happens to look at the effective POM > they will understand. It's also unlikely someone would actually use > that in their own POMs. > Although not an apach

Re: How to get available libraries in a remote repository

2008-11-08 Thread João Paulo Mafra
Hi Brian, Thanks a lot! I will see the code. Cheers, Joao Paulo 2008/11/8 Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You can use the Nexus index that is provided by central and Nexus hosted > repositories. This is the most common index that would have everything in > it. Otherwise you'd be looking a

Re: Apache Portable Runtime artifacts

2008-11-08 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Nov 8, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Max Bowsher wrote: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I would like to publish the APR artifacts into the Maven repository, [1]. I think that the group id should be org.apache.apr and the artifact id should be apr. Does anyone have a problem with these group and artifact ids?

RE: Default plugin execution id

2008-11-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 here. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 12:15 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Default plugin execution id I don't think anyone is generally going to type: default-execution-id It says what it is and if someon

Re: Apache Portable Runtime artifacts

2008-11-08 Thread Max Bowsher
Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I would like to publish the APR artifacts into the Maven repository, > [1]. I think that the group id should be org.apache.apr and the > artifact id should be apr. > > Does anyone have a problem with these group and artifact ids? Does > anyone have a problem with me publ

Re: Default plugin execution id

2008-11-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
I don't think anyone is generally going to type: default-execution-id It says what it is and if someone happens to look at the effective POM they will understand. It's also unlikely someone would actually use that in their own POMs. On 8-Nov-08, at 2:23 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Brett

RE: How to get available libraries in a remote repository

2008-11-08 Thread Brian E. Fox
You can use the Nexus index that is provided by central and Nexus hosted repositories. This is the most common index that would have everything in it. Otherwise you'd be looking at crawling the remote repo. While the index is a lucene index at it's core, the most reliable way is via the api. The

How to get available libraries in a remote repository

2008-11-08 Thread João Paulo Mafra
Hi, I'm new to maven plugin development, and I creating a plugin that needs to get information about all available libraries in a maven remote repository. There is any xml that has metadata about that? Or how I get that information inside a mojo? Thanks

Re: Default plugin execution id

2008-11-08 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: How about #groupId:artifactId:sequenceNumber. What would be the sequenceNumber part? This kind of execution config is surely an edge case but I would prefer the execution id to not be too complex/cryptic (someday I might want to type it into the POM...). It would be un

Re: Default plugin execution id

2008-11-08 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Christian Schulte wrote: ^ 4.0.0 The identifier of this execution for labelling the goals during the build, and for matching executions to merge during inheritance. If I got it right, one can