Brett Porter wrote:
> How about #groupId:artifactId:sequenceNumber.
>
> It would be unique to the POM.
>
^
4.0.0
The identifier of this execution for labelling the goals during
the build, and for matchi
How about #groupId:artifactId:sequenceNumber.
It would be unique to the POM.
On 07/11/2008, at 10:09 PM, Christian Schulte wrote:
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Definitely 2.1 and that way if there is a conflict, it's part of
moving
forward. Is there a name besides default that might be less likely to
Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Definitely 2.1 and that way if there is a conflict, it's part of moving
> forward. Is there a name besides default that might be less likely to
> conflict?
>
org.apache.maven/2.1 ?
--
Christian
-
To unsub
Thanks Wendy for organising and taking more thorough notes :)
I've observed a few interesting things here. It feels like people are
"happier" with Maven than previously. Rather than frustration, there
have been more questions and enthusiasm. It seems as though the
fundamentals have sunk in
> Another question might be: Does the relation
> 1 sink -> 1 output file/stream
> always hold or are there formats that might need to output multiple files?
> In the later case, createSink( OutputStream ) would be troublesome.
The relation should persist.
Cheers,
Vincent
> > Then I think "Sink createSink( Writer writer )" should be removed.
>
> I prefer deprecated for backward compatibility issue.
this method was added in 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT: 1.0-beta-1 hasn't been released
yet. Is there really any backward compatibility issue here?
Definitely 2.1 and that way if there is a conflict, it's part of moving
forward. Is there a name besides default that might be less likely to
conflict?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 4:18 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: R
Ok thanks, I attached a patch which is just a one line change to set the
execution id to "default" if nothing is specified.
It fixes the issue for me, but I guess the concern is that it could change the
behaviour for anyone currently using an id of "default" or not using an
execution id. So I
Yes, this is needed. I have a jira somewhere for it...
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3401
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 3:46 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Default plugin execution id
Hi everyone,
I'd like to b
Hi everyone,
I'd like to be able to configure the default execution of a plugin within an
execution instead of doing it through the main plugin configuration. So the
result would look something like this:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-jar-plugin
default
We had a Build Tools and Repository Managers BOF earlier this week at
ApacheCon... while I left the topic general, it pretty much turned
into the Maven BOF. :) Following are brief notes about the topics
that came up. Please fill in if I missed something or ask for more
details, more than likely
Hi,
2008/11/7 Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -1: please revert this change
>
> String.valueOf( '\u00a9' ) represents the Copyright symbol: there is no
> encoding notion available here.
> => the code was perfectly correct and did what was expected
Not sure since I got exception with the orig
Such contriction will not work. The problem is in the way compiler
plugin is instantiated: compiler environment is created, and them the
same instance is reused for test-compiler, sticking to the existing
plugin configuration. Execution does not get a new instance of as far
as can see.
That
Le vendredi 07 novembre 2008, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> It might however be convenient to create an AbstractTextSinkFactory from
> which all/most text-based sinks could inherit.
Seems a good idea.
This would ensure too that every text-based sinks have the same default
encoding: it gives some c
-1: please revert this change
String.valueOf( '\u00a9' ) represents the Copyright symbol: there is no
encoding notion available here.
=> the code was perfectly correct and did what was expected
I'll try to explain what the new code does:
1. String.valueOf( '\u00a9' ): gets the Copyright symbol (
I would like to publish the APR artifacts into the Maven repository,
[1]. I think that the group id should be org.apache.apr and the
artifact id should be apr.
Does anyone have a problem with these group and artifact ids? Does
anyone have a problem with me publishing these artifacts?
R
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
For the next 1.0-beta-1 version, 2 methods have been added to SinkFactory
interface to improve encoding support:
- Sink createSink( File outputDir, String outputName, String encoding )
Sounds good. This would enable the caller to configure the desired
output encoding for
Oleg, these distro mgt urls are not right, not sure where they came from but
they are all over your poms:
+
+
+ repo1
+ Maven Central Repository
+
scp://repo1.maven.org/home/projects/maven/repository-staging/to-ibiblio/maven2
+
+deployed
+
+
+ repo1
+
Hi folks,
For the next 1.0-beta-1 version, 2 methods have been added to SinkFactory
interface to improve encoding support:
- Sink createSink( File outputDir, String outputName, String encoding )
- Sink createSink( Writer writer )
See [1] for the full interface.
I worked with Vincent to implement
I will be out of the office starting 01.11.2008 and will not return until
10.11.2008.
I will respond to your message when I return. In urgent cases please refer
to Elena Tonoyan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Daria Ignatieva
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Milos Kleint wrote:
>
> well, I suppose the question was if configuring just the testCompile
> execution doesn't work.
> I suppose having a general config at sourcelevel 1.4 and then specific
> one for testCompile execution shall work.
>
I've the same problem and I've tried this way too, but i
21 matches
Mail list logo
