Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-beta-2

2008-10-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
What do you mean/want ? There is a staging repo And snaphots are here http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-filtering/1.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT/ ? -- Olivier 2008/10/4 Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > snapshot is up to date? > > -D > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 a

Re: [VOTE] release and promote Mercury 1.0.0-alpha-1

2008-10-03 Thread Oleg Gusakov
Jason Dillon wrote: +1 Will this also include the non-transport bits? I'm looking to consume those in gshell ASAP to replace maven-artifact. Not all of them - there is still one piece missing. I will document the exact status and progress in more detail in a separate jira Thanks, Oleg --

Re: [VOTE] release and promote Mercury 1.0.0-alpha-1

2008-10-03 Thread Jason Dillon
+1 Will this also include the non-transport bits? I'm looking to consume those in gshell ASAP to replace maven-artifact. --jason On Oct 4, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: I open this vote to release mercury 1.0.0-alpha-1 and promote it out of sandbox, so that we can start using t

[VOTE] release and promote Mercury 1.0.0-alpha-1

2008-10-03 Thread Oleg Gusakov
I open this vote to release mercury 1.0.0-alpha-1 and promote it out of sandbox, so that we can start using the transport piece - mercury wagon - right away. For the past several months a group of some 5 community members has been working on Mercury - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Mer

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-beta-2

2008-10-03 Thread Dan Tran
snapshot is up to date? -D On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > In preparation of resources plugin, I'd like to release the shared > library maven-filtering version 1.0-beta-2. > We solved 6 issues : > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?ver

[VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-beta-2

2008-10-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, In preparation of resources plugin, I'd like to release the shared library maven-filtering version 1.0-beta-2. We solved 6 issues : http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14488&styleName=Html&projectId=11761&Create=Create Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-

Re: Jira reports are up

2008-10-03 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
you're right there's no need to poll scm. There no tests, nor integration to do. I just kept daily schedule About version control polling rules @ Apache it's a little bit annoying. An integration cycle launched every hour is not really a continuous integration. It's better than nothing but a littl

Re: Jira reports are up

2008-10-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > https://ci.sonatype.org/view/Reports/ > http://www.sonatype.org/~j2ee-hudson/reports/ > > They are launched every night and every 5 minutes if the code changed. Thanks, Arnaud! Does that mean we're polling svn every 5 mi

Re: Jira reports are up

2008-10-03 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Thanks Arnaud! Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > https://ci.sonatype.org/view/Reports/ > http://www.sonatype.org/~j2ee-hudson/reports/ > > They are launched every night and every 5 minutes if the code changed. > > cheers > > .. > Arnaud HERITIER >

Re: Mercury wagon progress

2008-10-03 Thread Oleg Gusakov
James, James William Dumay wrote: Hey Oleg, Curious, will the Mecury wagon provider be the new handler for the dav: protocol extension? Yes - Mercury replaces a dav protocol wagon handler if this is the question. It does not claim to handle entire DAV protocol, including versioning, etc.

Re: Shooting for 3.0-alpha-1 staging for Monday

2008-10-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
What I'm planning to release is by no means a stable milestone, it is an alpha. On 3-Oct-08, at 9:52 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: I thought we abandonned alpha/beta versionning scheme to use Milestones/ReleaseCandidates & co ?? Arnaud On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Shooting for 3.0-alpha-1 staging for Monday

2008-10-03 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I thought we abandonned alpha/beta versionning scheme to use Milestones/ReleaseCandidates & co ?? Arnaud On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not required for the alphas, the second we start into the betas > then yes I would agree. Some of the ITs wi

Re: Mercury wagon progress

2008-10-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 3-Oct-08, at 1:34 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: I have been testing Mercury wagon provider with 2.2.x and 2.1.x branches and successfully pass all the ITs but one, please see the tracking comments in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERCURY-8 and it's subtasks The missing test - it0031 - dea

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: NMaven - Apache NMaven: maven-dotnet-core-it-runner - default maven2 buildDefinition

2008-10-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
Thanks. -- Olivier 2008/10/3 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yep, sorry, I got side tracked after trying this the other day. I'll change > it now. > > On 03/10/2008, at 7:08 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> is-it possible to use an other ml ? >> >> 2008/10/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: NMaven - Apache NMaven: maven-dotnet-core-it-runner - default maven2 buildDefinition

2008-10-03 Thread Brett Porter
Yep, sorry, I got side tracked after trying this the other day. I'll change it now. On 03/10/2008, at 7:08 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: is-it possible to use an other ml ? 2008/10/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buil

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: NMaven - Apache NMaven: maven-dotnet-core-it-runner - default maven2 buildDefinition

2008-10-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
is-it possible to use an other ml ? 2008/10/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Online report : > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=118181&projectId=1247 > > Build statistics: > State: Failed > Previous State: Failed > Started at: Fri 3 Oct 2008 01:11:58 -070