/me cheers
Yep, go for it.
This will also mean producing shaded versions of the wagons though I
think, or creating a shaded "built-in wagons" JAR, to prevent some of
their dependencies being forced on plugins. The ITs for MNG-3581/3599
might pick this up, but it would be worth an extra IT
Just means we use a shaded version of plexus instead of shading the
entire Maven runtime.
Wouldn't change anything. Plugins could still use their own version of
p-u.
On 22-Sep-08, at 7:12 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I would like to remove the uber jar in 2.1 and do
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Out of curiosity, why are you prefer m-e-p plugin over IDE support?
>
> For example, m2eclipse [1] can import Maven projects without running
> intermediate commands and it does cache if source artifacts are present
+1 (obviously)
Raphaël
2008/9/22, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 19 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095&styleName=Html&version=14253
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~rafale/archetype-stage-repository/
> Beware
Hi,
We solved 19 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095&styleName=Html&version=14253
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~rafale/archetype-stage-repository/
Beware of MNG-2974, a workaround is currently to use a repository manager.
Staging site:
http://maven.
Sounds good to me, as long as we test to make sure it doesn't affect
plugins using things like a different version of plexus-utils.
-j
---
John Casey
Developer and PMC Member, Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp
Please imagine the sound of an intermediate level of APPLAUSE for this
suggestion.
Jason van Zyl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, so how's the vacation going?
Will Mark still be contacting us after Oct 1?
Gil
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 10:01 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: No more uber jar
I made the uber jar and I think it was a mi
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I would like to remove the uber jar in 2.1 and do it on the 2.2 branch
as well.
Any objections?
How does this relate to MNG-2892? Are there other means that allow
plugins to use different versions of the libs that are used by the core
like plexus-utils?
Benjamin
--
I made the uber jar and I think it was a mistake. It's a complete PITA
to swap in new jars and test and the shading can work on the JARs
necessary.
I would like to remove the uber jar in 2.1 and do it on the 2.2 branch
as well.
Any objections?
Thanks,
Jason
+1 All of this sounds great to me. Thanks for taking this on.
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing.
So we would have core-it-suite and core-it-support, looks nice IMHO and
is still reasonably short (which is all I am i
On 22-Sep-08, at 2:14 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing.
So we would have core-it-suite and core-it-support, looks nice IMHO
and is still reasonably short (which is all I am interested in). So
unless somebod
Brett Porter wrote:
I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing.
So we would have core-it-suite and core-it-support, looks nice IMHO and
is still reasonably short (which is all I am interested in). So unless
somebody objects, let's go for that ;-)
I additionally think
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Just a remark : sometime you replace integration-tests by "its" otherwise by
"it". Perhaps we could unify them .
Yes, you're right. The distinction between singular/plural is rather
irrelevant here so I agree, let's have it all "it" for consistency.
Benjamin
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
