Well I think creating the folders up to the file is not so difficult,
because the folder creation can have a race, as long as it's not a
destructive creation. I think it's just the file you need to worry
about, and my examination of the c files underlying the
createFileExclusively suggests
Christian Edward Gruber wrote:
BTW, my suggestion isn't as robust as java.nio.channels.FileLock is
supposed to be, but in basic testing it definitely returns "false" if
the lock file exists on two platforms (MacOS and BSD). I can't
generate a race condition so easily, so I can't vouch for th
So is File.createNewFile() not actually back-ended by the platform's
atomic file creation capability (that is, if there is one, it uses it,
else there's a possible race)? If so, I'd just use that. Looking
through the 1.5 source, it at least calls to
FileSystem.createFileExclusively, which
BTW, my suggestion isn't as robust as java.nio.channels.FileLock is
supposed to be, but in basic testing it definitely returns "false" if
the lock file exists on two platforms (MacOS and BSD). I can't
generate a race condition so easily, so I can't vouch for that, but it
would at least red
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
htt
No, most of the activity has happened in the range of plugins that do
lot of the work themselves.
- Brett
On 09/09/2008, at 6:02 AM, James Carpenter wrote:
Creating aggregate reports in maven has historically been a little
awkward.
To this end i remember chatter about revamping the reportin
This vote passed, +1 Brian, John, Vincent. I'll move the artifacts.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Siveton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:57 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release maven-parent 9 TAKE 2
Go ahead. +1
Vincent
2008/9/10
Alright, I'm pulling the trigger on this one and cancelling the vote. I
have to monkey with the poms some more to line up the plugin with the
values in the maven-plugin-parent. This is a good use case for the
mix-ins because I need to inherit default values from the enforcer and
from the maven-plug
Brian,
It looks like the "Goals" link is broken.
By the way, very useful plugin. I already added it to our company POM
and I have a bunch of rules commented out until alpha-4 comes :)
Thanks,
Andreas
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Ok the site is restaged, and the links are in the menu now. (looks muc
Ok the site is restaged, and the links are in the menu now. (looks much
better btw)
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/plugins/maven-enforcer-plugin/
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/enforcer/
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10,
My request on Mojo dev list had no reply.
Could someone take a look at this :
Hy,
I plan to call for a vote during september to promote GWT maven plugin from
sandbox
This includes creating a dedicated Jira project in replacement for MOJO
"gwt" component.
Where can I request a new Jira project
> You have a problem with your path .
>
:-D
dammit! someone could have told me to set the M2_HOME environment
variable to the correct folder :)
second try:
this time mvn was downloading some new plugin versions
the web projects run ok
the rich client projects run ok too
our custom mvn plugin
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Stephen Connolly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The dev list is really for people developing Maven (and maven plugins)
> not
> > for people developing with Maven (who are really users)
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Stephen Connolly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> add a configuration to the plugin directly not nested within an execution.
>
> that will modify the defaults for all executions.
>
> you may then need to add in the configuration sections for each execution
> the config
add a configuration to the plugin directly not nested within an execution.
that will modify the defaults for all executions.
you may then need to add in the configuration sections for each execution
the config to switch back from your defaults.
Also, this kind of question is better suited to the
This will teach me to write before I've fully checked everything.
I had true on so I could check the configurations.
What this configuration gives is three executions of surefire:
[INFO] [surefire:test]
...
[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: test}]
...
[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: integration-
16 matches
Mail list logo
