Re: MASSEMBLY-345

2008-08-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this is Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus team. Our release depends on > fixing the 345 issue of the Assembly plugin and releasing a new version of > this plugin. I have created several patches and integration tests

Re: Custom plugin goalprefix not correct in generated site

2008-08-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
De Smet Ringo wrote: I have written a custom Maven2 plugin, in our CVS repo called maven2.plugin. That's an unusual artifact id, the convention is to use something like "telenet-maven-plugin", compare [0]. In the POM, I have specified the goalprefix to be "telenet". However, in the generat

MASSEMBLY-345

2008-08-23 Thread Petar Tahchiev
Hi guys, this is Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus team. Our release depends on fixing the 345 issue of the Assembly plugin and releasing a new version of this plugin. I have created several patches and integration tests for this issue. Here is a link: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMB

[VOTE] Release Maven Scm 1.1 (take 3)

2008-08-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, The last release of maven-scm is now 14 months old. I'd like to release maven-scm 1.1 which include two new providers git and accurev and fix some issues. We solved 41 issues : http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13984&styleName=Html&projectId=10527&Create=Create Staging

Re: RC release proposal -> Point releases + Beta quality

2008-08-23 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
On 23-Aug-08, at 05:38 , Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Paul Benedict wrote: What would you think of if 2.0.10 was voted as beta, and then 2.0.11 would take the place of RC1-RC10 build list. [...] This is, in a way, similar to the odd-even release versioning scheme. It's surely my Windows-related

Re: RC release proposal -> Point releases + Beta quality

2008-08-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Paul Benedict wrote: What would you think of if 2.0.10 was voted as beta, and then 2.0.11 would take the place of RC1-RC10 build list. [...] This is, in a way, similar to the odd-even release versioning scheme. It's surely my Windows-related background but I wouldn't recommend to name a binar

Re: RC release proposal -> Point releases + Beta quality

2008-08-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Paul Benedict wrote: Each time he published an RC, he waited about 4-6 weeks to collect feedback, patched those bugs, and released the next RC. Call me a bad guy, but once I know of a single bug in a RC, I don't pay any further attention to it. I simply mark it broken/unusable and don't try