ah, that is the reason, i am not on at list.
thanks
-D
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing them on surefire-commits.
>
> Could we just kill the separate surefire lists? surefire doesn't have
> enough of its own traffic t
Brett Porter wrote:
I'm seeing them on surefire-commits.
Could we just kill the separate surefire lists? surefire doesn't have
enough of its own traffic to warrant it.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I'm seeing them on surefire-commits.
- Brett
On 17/08/2008, at 4:47 AM, Dan Tran wrote:
I committed a few surefire fixes last a couple of days and dont see
the commit emails,
Can someone look into this issue?
Thanks
-D
-
T
Unless it's a regression between 2.0.9 and 2.0.10, it should go into
2.0.11otherwise we'd be here fixing things forever (it's already
taking long enough to stabilize)
-Original Message-
From: Dan Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 1:04 PM
To: Maven Develope
i think the fix was in the core
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I reopen MRELEASE-3, this is a regression probably back at maven
> 2.0.6, and hope it can be squeezed to 2.0.10
>
> Thanks
>
> -D
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 AM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED
I reopen MRELEASE-3, this is a regression probably back at maven
2.0.6, and hope it can be squeezed to 2.0.10
Thanks
-D
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 AM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I opened MNG-3718 for this (I probably didn't need to, but there ya go...)
>
> And, it's fixed in SVN.
I committed a few surefire fixes last a couple of days and dont see
the commit emails,
Can someone look into this issue?
Thanks
-D
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what about configuration's expression? i would prefer to start with
plugin name to prevent collision.
base on last 3 discussions, we just follow java method convention will
simplified lots of confusions
-D
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do we have an agreed naming convention for plugin goals? E.g.
> reactor:makeMyChanges
> and
> dependency:purge-local-repository
>
> obviously follow different rules. Having one naming style would ease
> memorizing si
I would say the first one. The first goal I could think of to have
this was testCompile, so it probably set the precedent. Also helpful
to differentiate from lifecycle phases.
- Brett
On 16/08/2008, at 6:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
do we have an agreed naming convention for plugin
Hi,
do we have an agreed naming convention for plugin goals? E.g.
reactor:makeMyChanges
and
dependency:purge-local-repository
obviously follow different rules. Having one naming style would ease
memorizing since users only need to remember the words and not also
their writing style.
11 matches
Mail list logo