Re: no commit email for surefire

2008-08-16 Thread Dan Tran
ah, that is the reason, i am not on at list. thanks -D On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Porter wrote: > >> I'm seeing them on surefire-commits. > > Could we just kill the separate surefire lists? surefire doesn't have > enough of its own traffic t

Re: no commit email for surefire

2008-08-16 Thread Dan Fabulich
Brett Porter wrote: I'm seeing them on surefire-commits. Could we just kill the separate surefire lists? surefire doesn't have enough of its own traffic to warrant it. -Dan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: no commit email for surefire

2008-08-16 Thread Brett Porter
I'm seeing them on surefire-commits. - Brett On 17/08/2008, at 4:47 AM, Dan Tran wrote: I committed a few surefire fixes last a couple of days and dont see the commit emails, Can someone look into this issue? Thanks -D - T

RE: Maven 2.0.10-RC8

2008-08-16 Thread Brian E. Fox
Unless it's a regression between 2.0.9 and 2.0.10, it should go into 2.0.11otherwise we'd be here fixing things forever (it's already taking long enough to stabilize) -Original Message- From: Dan Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 1:04 PM To: Maven Develope

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC8

2008-08-16 Thread Dan Tran
i think the fix was in the core On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I reopen MRELEASE-3, this is a regression probably back at maven > 2.0.6, and hope it can be squeezed to 2.0.10 > > Thanks > > -D > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 AM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC8

2008-08-16 Thread Dan Tran
I reopen MRELEASE-3, this is a regression probably back at maven 2.0.6, and hope it can be squeezed to 2.0.10 Thanks -D On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 AM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I opened MNG-3718 for this (I probably didn't need to, but there ya go...) > > And, it's fixed in SVN.

no commit email for surefire

2008-08-16 Thread Dan Tran
I committed a few surefire fixes last a couple of days and dont see the commit emails, Can someone look into this issue? Thanks -D - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Naming Convention for Goals?

2008-08-16 Thread Dan Tran
what about configuration's expression? i would prefer to start with plugin name to prevent collision. base on last 3 discussions, we just follow java method convention will simplified lots of confusions -D On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug

Re: Naming Convention for Goals?

2008-08-16 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do we have an agreed naming convention for plugin goals? E.g. > reactor:makeMyChanges > and > dependency:purge-local-repository > > obviously follow different rules. Having one naming style would ease > memorizing si

Re: Naming Convention for Goals?

2008-08-16 Thread Brett Porter
I would say the first one. The first goal I could think of to have this was testCompile, so it probably set the precedent. Also helpful to differentiate from lifecycle phases. - Brett On 16/08/2008, at 6:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, do we have an agreed naming convention for plugin

Naming Convention for Goals?

2008-08-16 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, do we have an agreed naming convention for plugin goals? E.g. reactor:makeMyChanges and dependency:purge-local-repository obviously follow different rules. Having one naming style would ease memorizing since users only need to remember the words and not also their writing style.