Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

Just add -fae to the goals line. Until I verify the use separate repo works I prefer to use the maven switch directly Sent from my iPhone On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:36 AM, "Arnaud HERITIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible ? I never saw this option in hudson. Is it the option called "

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

Go for it Sent from my iPhone On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hi, while having a look at the recent failure during build #181 of maven- shared, I noticed that the modules after the failing one were not build at all ("Build failed before it gets

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

No, it's not required to redo it as freestyle just to add fae On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just use a freestyle project and then you can do whatever you like. On 30-Jul-08, at 6:36 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Is it possible ? I never saw this option in

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC3 - Please Test!

Thanks for the time on all of this. I had made a note locally to take a look at the tests in wagon to see what could be improved once I got 2.0.10 out the door, but you've beaten me to it. I'll hold off on the RC4 I was about to announce, if you're releasing it tomorrow, and we can try pushing

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

there is already that is worth considering... its goal is correctness and roundtripability ;-)... its mature and stable... i have used it and been very happy On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:34:53 Stephen Connolly wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Connolly < > > [EMAIL

RE: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

Fixed now, never seen that happen before so I'll keep an eye out. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:37 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end? Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > We have also a

Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC3 - Please Test!

On 30/07/2008, at 12:01 PM, John Casey wrote: I think you're misunderstanding me: I was talking about test coverage within _wagon_ itself. Since wagon is on a separate release cycle to Maven core, Maven releases have to consume released versions of wagon. This means 72h of voting and so fo

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

Hi, I've finished all the main features and released version 1.0 of DecentXML on Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/decentxml/ Regards, -- Aaron "Optimizer" Digulla a.k.a. Philmann Dark "It's not the universe that's limited, it's our imagination. Follow me and I'll show you something beyond

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

Jason van Zyl schrieb: >> It's official: I'm through with the W3C and the stupid XML parsers which >> came in it's wake. To allow to write XML filters and editors which don't >> ruin the layout, I've started my own XML parser project "DecentXML". > There are a couple that are decent. XMLBeans does

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

Arnaud HERITIER wrote: We have also always one executor frozen for 1 day : maven-ant-plugin-trunk Seems like the other build processor has also gone mad with "maven-2.0.10-RC" :( Hudson is totally blocked and has already seven new IT build

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

Just use a freestyle project and then you can do whatever you like. On 30-Jul-08, at 6:36 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Is it possible ? I never saw this option in hudson. Is it the option called "Build modules in parallel" ? I also noticed that we oftened manually defined custom local repos for

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

Is it possible ? I never saw this option in hudson. Is it the option called "Build modules in parallel" ? I also noticed that we oftened manually defined custom local repos for builds with -Dmaven.repo.local=... Perhaps we could use the "Use private maven repository" option that was added in 1.223

Re: timestamp plugins and build reproductibility

Yes, I fixed the issue but updating the plugin timestamp to -7. Thanks. Nicolas. 2008/7/30 Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > nicolas de loof wrote: > > I went into an issue with the release plugin : >> >> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: createArg >>at >> >> org.apache.maven.shared.re

Re: timestamp plugins and build reproductibility

nicolas de loof wrote: I went into an issue with the release plugin : java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: createArg at org.apache.maven.shared.release.exec.ForkedMavenExecutor.executeGoals(ForkedMavenExecutor.java:79) Just in case you didn't already find out yourself: The problem was that m

Re: CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

+1 On 30-Jul-08, at 6:13 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, while having a look at the recent failure during build #181 of maven- shared, I noticed that the modules after the failing one were not build at all ("Build failed before it gets to this module"). Since the modules of maven-shared

CI job maven-shared: fail-at-end?

Hi, while having a look at the recent failure during build #181 of maven-shared, I noticed that the modules after the failing one were not build at all ("Build failed before it gets to this module"). Since the modules of maven-shared are not that tightly coupled, might it be sensible to chan

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

There are a couple that are decent. XMLBeans does a good job of not completely mutilating the XML, and the code that's been created for m2eclipse using EMF is pretty good as well. Netbeans is still using some JDOM based code that is not bad either. The JDOM code is so-so and is used in a fe

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Done Great, thanks a lot :-) So it's MNG-3283 the real problem... Thanks again and sorry for the (unintended) rudeness. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For add

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

Done. Just wait sync. -- Olivier 2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Olivier, > > 2008/7/30 Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hi, >> The front page [1] says :" >> This Plexus components has been build with the filtering process/code >> coming from the maven-resources-plugin. >>

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

Done Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/30 Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I understand your arguments but this issue is due to >> @requiresDependencyResolution tag. >> It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. > > Thank you Vincent, but then wh

timestamp plugins and build reproductibility

Hello, I went into an issue with the release plugin : I'm using SNAPSHOT plugins, and to make my build reproductible I fixed the versions to timestamps. This worked fine until today as I get : java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: createArg at org.apache.maven.shared.release.exec.ForkedMavenExecu

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

2008/7/30 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I understand your arguments but this issue is due to > @requiresDependencyResolution tag. > It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. Thank you Vincent, but then why don't you open a new issue for the core, and let MJAVADOC-116 depend on this o

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

Hi Olivier, 2008/7/30 Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > The front page [1] says :" > This Plexus components has been build with the filtering process/code > coming from the maven-resources-plugin. > The goal is to provide a common way for all plugins which needs to > filtering resources. "

Re: MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

Hi Antonio, I understand your arguments but this issue is due to @requiresDependencyResolution tag. It is more a core problem than a plugin issue. BTW we could add a FAQ entry. Any more thoughts? Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/30 Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > sorry to disturb you,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven DOAP plugin version 1.0

+1 Arnaud On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > -- > Olivier > > 2008/7/29 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 10 issues: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11310&styleName=Html&version=13182 > >

MJAVADOC-116: is "won't fix" the best solution?

Hi all, sorry to disturb you, but I sincerely don't like that MJAVADOC-116 has been closed: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-116 The bug (because it *is* a bug) is still there, and closing it won't hide the problem. Why did you close it? Can you explain the technical difficulties that you h

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Connolly < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On 30/07/2008, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: >> >> Quoting Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> I've got some code ready fo

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 30/07/2008, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: > > Quoting Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> I've got some code ready for you to try: http://www.pdark.de/decentxml-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz >>> wrong list

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

Hi, The front page [1] says :" This Plexus components has been build with the filtering process/code coming from the maven-resources-plugin. The goal is to provide a common way for all plugins which needs to filtering resources. " It's not enough ? (sorry I'm not english native and I can't put mor

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Filtering version 1.0-alpha-1

Yes, +1 ! - Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > In preparation of the maven-war-plugin, I'd like to release and > promote out of the sandbox the maven-filtering component version > 1.0-alpha-1. > The goal of this component

Re: POM rewriting with DecentXML

On 30/07/2008, at 4:52 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: Quoting Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I've got some code ready for you to try: http://www.pdark.de/decentxml-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz wrong list? :) I've seen three Maven plugins which use their own code to manipulate POM and other XML f