Couldn't we setup a custom profile for QA checks (pmd, checkstyle, clirr
...) that we activate in a separate project in the CI server ?
It's what I begin to do at work. The advantage is to keep the integration
build fast and we can have a look at the QA builds to improve them.
Arnaud
On Mon, Jul
I will be out of the office starting 12.07.2008 and will not return until
28.07.2008.
I will respond to your message when I return. In urgent cases please refer
to Elena Tonoyan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Daria Ignatieva
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi Oleg,
Looking at the release, the signatures are from a generic key. While
we're debating that in the other thread, for this release, can you
sign the artifacts using your own key, and add that to the KEYS file
in SVN? Also, the signatures do not need to be checksummed.
Other than that
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20-Jul-08, at 9:42 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
>> Yes. The svn commits need to show the person who actually made the
>> change to svn.
>
> I can fix that, is that the only problem?
No, but I think Brett has it covered. :)
On 21/07/2008, at 12:20 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The important thing is that the release process does not use your
credentials for either SVN or SSH when it's not you doing the
release.
I don't think that's important at all, but I can easily fix it.
Do I have to SSH into your account o
On 21/07/2008, at 12:23 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I confirmed my initial hunch but I'm not sure how to fix this the
right way. Here's what is happening:
The rule gets the list of plugins bound by the default lifecycles
(additional lifecycles may be specified) and additional Plugins
specifi
I confirmed my initial hunch but I'm not sure how to fix this the right way.
Here's what is happening:
The rule gets the list of plugins bound by the default lifecycles (additional
lifecycles may be specified) and additional Plugins specified by the user. It
then gets the list of plugins specif
On 19/07/2008, at 11:26 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
I went and harvested the mojo-dev list for release vote comments,
most of the from Benjamin. Some are specific to plugins, but many
are general. Here's the list:
Thanks Dennis! (and Benjamin :)
Inherit from the latest released parent
On 20-Jul-08, at 10:13 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 18/07/2008, at 11:54 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I am actually trying to work with a developer who knows Hudson very
well to create a better bridge from Maven and Hudson. Basically
using Maven SCM (instead of the proliferation of Hudson plugi
On 18/07/2008, at 11:54 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I am actually trying to work with a developer who knows Hudson very
well to create a better bridge from Maven and Hudson. Basically
using Maven SCM (instead of the proliferation of Hudson plugins
doing exactly the same thing), creating a Ple
On 20-Jul-08, at 9:42 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
They are not being shared. Hudson is running as a sand-boxed user
where I
have setup my credentials, so that the releases can be fully
automated where
the same set of a
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They are not being shared. Hudson is running as a sand-boxed user where I
> have setup my credentials, so that the releases can be fully automated where
> the same set of attributes are used across the board. I tested my
Well is anyone interested?
If it's a blocker I can relicense it to the MIT license.
I'm also working on two more goals:
update-plugins
try-updating-plugins
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Stephen Connolly (JIRA)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [plugin submission] versions-maven-plugin
> ---
Release was rolledback and performed again, site and staging repo
updated, please restart the voting process
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125&styleName=Html&version=12210
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo
Staging site:
http://maven.apache
Hi,
2008/7/19, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is great as long as it does not become bureaucratic and onerous for
> everyone to do a release.
Totally agree with you: it could be time consuming for the release
manager and for the committers which review...
> How to prevent that is cod
15 matches
Mail list logo
