Sorry Gilles, I didn't mean to try put words in your mouth :) I probably just
read your email describing Ivy too quickly and assumed that you wanted Maven to
have similar features.
Gilles Scokart wrote:
For the record, note that I didn't argue that maven should do the same
than ivy. Ivy has
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In trunk, it says the maven-deploy-plugin still needs the release of
> maven-plugin-testing-harness and maven-plugin-plugin.
Yep. I think that ends up meaning a release of plugin-tools [1] and
plugin-testing
Hi Raphaël,
Having mirrors is not mandatory (this is the default for a maven
installation), but if you have a mirror element, mirrorOf for that
element is mandatory (I'm not sure if settings.xml reflects that, but
it makes no sense with out it).
ie, this is invalid:
new-central
http
Hi folks,
I answered that the mirrorOf element in settings
is mandatory, as it behave such.
But reading the http://maven.apache.org/xsd/settings-1.0.0.xsd
It seems that any element in
settings/mirrors/mirror ain't mandatory.
Which resulted in the described problem in the issue.
Here the problem o
I've moved the docs in svn now, according to the plan below.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Thanks for clearing that up Brian.
I'll go ahead and make the necessary changes. We'll have to remember to
add a redirect in an .htaccess file once the site for Enforcer 1.0 is
up, like this:
/plugins/maven-
On 03/06/2008, at 10:03 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
How to reconcile this is also on my todo as we have the CI system
constantly
building and deploying to our repo, but I'm told that infra won't
allow us
to automatically put stuff on people.
That's not true, you just have to rsync it from peo
+1
The release plugin, should it need to move to the new version, could
either use a retrotranslated version or declare dependence on Java 5
itself. I assume the SCM plugin will just declare dependence on Java 5.
- Brett
On 04/06/2008, at 2:03 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1.
--
Olivier
200
Could we have an official 1.0-alpha-4 release after that then please?
It'd be good for everyone to give it a good testing before making the
final 1.0 release.
Mark
2008/6/3 Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Its going, I'm working to integrate the SHITTY plugin so that I can have
> real Its, and
How to reconcile this is also on my todo as we have the CI system constantly
building and deploying to our repo, but I'm told that infra won't allow us
to automatically put stuff on people.
On 6/3/08 7:04 AM, "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I please get new snaps of the component
Its going, I'm working to integrate the SHITTY plugin so that I can have
real Its, and I resolved several issues/patches last week.
If you're desperate to try the existing rule, we have a version
1.0-alpha-4-SONATYPE deployed in our repo:
http://repository.sonatype.org:8081/nexus/content/repositor
Can we have a pre-1.0 release since I've been unable to test
requirePluginVersions as it only works in trunk?
Mark
2008/6/3 Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What's new about this ???
> Brian ?
>
> Arnaud
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
Can I please get new snaps of the components/trunk and artifact/trunk
deployed please?
--jason
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's new about this ???
Brian ?
Arnaud
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for clearing that up Brian.
>
> I'll go ahead and make the necessary changes. We'll have to remember to add
> a redirect in an .htaccess file once the site for Enforcer
Great, thanks. Although there's a typo on the date (3th :).
Mark
2008/6/3 Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> I have done it.
> Svn commit :
>
>
> Author: olamy
> Date: Tue Jun 3 02:52:44 2008
> New Revision: 14277
>
> Log:
> Maven Runtime 1.0-alpha-1 release
>
> Modified:
> pmc/maven/p
Hi,
I have done it.
Svn commit :
Author: olamy
Date: Tue Jun 3 02:52:44 2008
New Revision: 14277
Log:
Maven Runtime 1.0-alpha-1 release
Modified:
pmc/maven/private/board-reports/current-report.txt
Modified: pmc/maven/private/board-reports/current-report.txt
Just a query regarding the following step in the release process [1]:
> 15. Add the release to the next board report, in the private subversion area.
Where is this fabled private subversion area exactly?
Mark
[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
---
I'd like to migrate to java5 too but for the moment maven-scm is used by
maven plugins and java5 isn't a prerequisite for the moment in maven.
What others think about this proposal?
Emmanuel
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Sergey Zakusov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What do you think
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Maven Runtime,
version 1.0-alpha-1.
This shared component allows introspection of Maven project metadata at runtime.
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-runtime/
You can run mvn -up to get the latest version of the component, or specify
the v
Vincent Siveton wrote:
2008/6/2, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Hrm, ok. But if we release site and pir plugins (which is slated to happen
soonish, right?), these people will be bitten by the same problems anyway,
unless maven-2.0.10 gets released in the meanti
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Hrm, ok. But if we release site and pir plugins (which is slated to
happen soonish, right?), these people will be bitten by the same
problems anyway, unless maven-2.0.10 gets released in the meantime and
they upgrade immediately. (And btw, shouldn
In trunk, it says the maven-deploy-plugin still needs the release of
maven-plugin-testing-harness and maven-plugin-plugin.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > No objections.
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
