Re: [proposal] java5 as minimal runtime for maven 2.1 (and 2.0.10 ?)

2008-05-10 Thread Stephen Connolly
My only concern would be plugins... but since 2.0.9 locked down the plugin versions that should not be as big an issue any more On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the sentiment is fairly clear. I am going to unwind the > retrotranslating I put in pl

Re: Releasng the war and deploy plugins

2008-05-10 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Well, to me there is a couple of things that we need to do but if nobody complains, let's go for 2.1 I'd be happy to have a release of the filtering thing so that I can use it in the EAR plugin. It can't filter src/main/application and many users are complaining :) Thanks, Stéphane On Fri, May 9

Re: Go Hudson!

2008-05-10 Thread Jorg Heymans
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > For those not at JavaOne I just wanted to mention that Kohsuke along with > the Hudson community won a Duke award. I think Hudson is awesome and Kohsuke > has done a great job supporting the community (just read th

Re: Donation of Maven plugins to the Maven Project.

2008-05-10 Thread Felix Knecht
Jason van Zyl schrieb: On 9-May-08, at 10:57 PM, Felix Knecht wrote: But one standard for everyone, please. You checked in a more significant contribution without discussion *at all* just a few days ago (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=653572). Apart from the discussion why

Re: Donation of Maven plugins to the Maven Project.

2008-05-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 9-May-08, at 10:57 PM, Felix Knecht wrote: But one standard for everyone, please. You checked in a more significant contribution without discussion *at all* just a few days ago (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=653572). Apart from the discussion why and who has committed