Re: 2.0.9 Javadoc has not been published

Thanks Jason On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 22:12 -0700, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Sorry I always use the IDE so that's what I was thinking. > > The site should be corrected. > > On 10-Apr-08, at 9:52 PM, James William Dumay wrote: > > The current symlink? > > > > James > > > > > > > > On 11/04/2008, at 2:5

Re: 2.0.9 Javadoc has not been published

Sorry I always use the IDE so that's what I was thinking. The site should be corrected. On 10-Apr-08, at 9:52 PM, James William Dumay wrote: The current symlink? James On 11/04/2008, at 2:51 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sure it has: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apach

Re: 2.0.9 Javadoc has not been published

http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-core/apidocs/index.html this still shows the version as 2.0.8 On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:52 +1000, James William Dumay wrote: > The current symlink? > > James > > > > On 11/04/2008, at 2:51 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sure it ha

Re: 2.0.9 Javadoc has not been published

The current symlink? James On 11/04/2008, at 2:51 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sure it has: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.9/ All the javadoc appears to have been deployed as per the normal process. Where are you looking? On 10-Apr-08, at

Re: 2.0.9 Javadoc has not been published

Sure it has: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.9/ All the javadoc appears to have been deployed as per the normal process. Where are you looking? On 10-Apr-08, at 9:34 PM, James William Dumay wrote: Hey guys, Seems the 2.0.9 javadoc is not up - could we get this

2.0.9 Javadoc has not been published

Hey guys, Seems the 2.0.9 javadoc is not up - could we get this published? Any reason why this is not part of the release process? Cheers James - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (29 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-3313NetBeans projects, more than ant project, more than fre

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype plugin version 2.0-alpha-3

my +1 Raphaël 2008/4/11, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > We solved 20 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095&styleName=Html&version=14088 > > Staging repo: > http://people.apache.org/~rafale/archetype-stage-repository/ > > Staging site: >

[VOTE] Release Maven Archetype plugin version 2.0-alpha-3

Hi, We solved 20 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095&styleName=Html&version=14088 Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~rafale/archetype-stage-repository/ Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-archetype-plugin-2.0-alpha-3 Guide to testing sta

Re: Please remove org.apache.myfaces.tobago version 1.0.16 from repo1.maven.org

Thanks Brian, the continuus server deployed to http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ Don't trust the wlan during a Lightning Talk. Regards Bernd Brian E. Fox schrieb: > > -Original Message- > From: Bernd Bohmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 1

RE: Please remove org.apache.myfaces.tobago version 1.0.16 from repo1.maven.org

-Original Message- From: Bernd Bohmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:56 PM To: Maven Developers List; MyFaces Development Subject: Please remove org.apache.myfaces.tobago version 1.0.16 from repo1.maven.org Hello, I have prepared the next release of apache-

Please remove org.apache.myfaces.tobago version 1.0.16 from repo1.maven.org

Hello, I have prepared the next release of apache-myfaces-tobago during the ApacheCon Europe. Because of a network error I was not able to commit the poms with the next development version. I rollback the release. Unfortunatley the continuus integration server already deployed 1.0.16 to the rsync

Re: svn commit: r646646 - in /maven/site/trunk: ./ src/site/apt/ src/site/apt/guides/introduction/ src/site/apt/guides/mini/ src/site/xdoc/

The download page still says 2.0.8. Did you intend that? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brianf Date: Wed Apr 9 21:54:44 2008 New Revision: 646646 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646646&view=rev Log: changes to site for 2.0.9 release Added: maven/site/trunk/src/site/apt/release-not

Re: maven 2.0.9 and enforcer plugin

Yep, that's the rule I was trying to use when I got the same error. Any plan to release the trunk of the enforcer soon? Mark On 10/04/2008, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I made some others tests, and I isolated the problem. > It occurs only if I activate the rule : > >

Re: maven 2.0.9 and enforcer plugin

I made some others tests, and I isolated the problem. It occurs only if I activate the rule : Best Practice is to always define plugin versions! This is effectively this issue. Thx for your help cheers arnaud On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:44 AM,

Re: maven 2.0.9 and enforcer plugin

i see the same error, looks like it is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-25 -D On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I attached the log. > Any idea about the problem ? > Should we open an issue ? Where ? In M2 or Enforcer ? > > Arna

Re: maven 2.0.9 and enforcer plugin

Hi Brian, I attached the log. Any idea about the problem ? Should we open an issue ? Where ? In M2 or Enforcer ? Arnaud On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09/04/2008, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had this when I attempted to use t