Re: Fixing MRELEASE-128: PluginDescriptor was not found

2008-04-05 Thread Torben Giesselmann
Thanks, Benjamin. Got it working ... Regards, - Torben Benjamin Bentmann wrote: [INFO] The PluginDescriptor for the plugin Plugin [org.apache.maven.release:maven-release-manager] was not found. org.apache.maven.release maven-release-manager

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 5-Apr-08, at 3:13 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: You don't need a 72 hour vote, I would try it in a branch first and then get people to look at it. Just wondering: If I would fill in JIRAs for each affected plugin to request a) adding an encoding parameter if not a

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Jason van Zyl wrote: You don't need a 72 hour vote, I would try it in a branch first and then get people to look at it. Just wondering: If I would fill in JIRAs for each affected plugin to request a) adding an encoding parameter if not already existent b) making this parameter default to Latin

Re: maven-scm-providers-git initial version

2008-04-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
Everything seems to pass, and I'll huck the whole lot under hudson and commit the git provider. On 5-Apr-08, at 2:44 PM, Eugene Kuleshov wrote: struberg wrote: For the really 'edgy' guys out there: I've fixed the maven-scm-provider-git to also work with git-1.5.4. $> git-clone http://ns1.

RE: maven-scm-providers-git initial version

2008-04-05 Thread Eugene Kuleshov
struberg wrote: > > For the really 'edgy' guys out there: I've fixed the > maven-scm-provider-git to also work with > git-1.5.4. > > $> git-clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/maven-scm-providers-git.git > as usual... > > Please provide feedback, so we can move this to codehaus if it's mature >

Re: [proposal] AbstractMojo enhancement

2008-04-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 5-Apr-08, at 12:21 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Could we make the AbstractMojo class more usefull by providing some commonly-used support methods ? +1 on the general idea to avoid copy&paste, -1 on the proposal to share code via AbstractMojo. For some reason, AbstractMojo is part of the

Re: [proposal] AbstractMojo enhancement

2008-04-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
I would use composition instead of inheritance and create helper components for those things. Pushing all the helper methods, when in most cases hardly any of them will be used, is not a good design. We definitely need helps for making classloaders (take the one from jetty run), working wit

Re: [proposal] AbstractMojo enhancement

2008-04-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Could we make the AbstractMojo class more usefull by providing some commonly-used support methods ? +1 on the general idea to avoid copy&paste, -1 on the proposal to share code via AbstractMojo. For some reason, AbstractMojo is part of the uber JAR and as such updates to it would be bound to

[proposal] AbstractMojo enhancement

2008-04-05 Thread nicolas de loof
Hello, Plugin developer only require to implement the Mojo interface, but in most (all ?) the case they extend AbstractMojo. Having myself created or contributed multiple plugins, I had to solve the same issues many time, using an copy/paste. Could we make the AbstractMojo class more usefull by

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le samedi 05 avril 2008, nicolas de loof a écrit : > +1 > > Is there any overlap with the tool chain proposal ? as I understand the tool chain proposal, no overlap at all the tool chain is here to let a central place to configure tools on every developer environment (like where is javac 1.5) sour

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
You don't need a 72 hour vote, I would try it in a branch first and then get people to look at it. It's a good idea, just don't do it on trunk directly so that we have the before and after to compare. On 5-Apr-08, at 10:20 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Hi, Since the discussion on the list abou

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread Tomasz Pik
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The full proposal is here: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/POM+Element+for+Source+File+Encoding Non-binding +1 Regards, Tomek -

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
+1 Benjamin Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Hi, Since the discussion on the list about Maven and encoding 2 weeks ago, Benjamin and I worked on a proposal to have: 1. a central point of configuration of sources encoding, to be used by each and every plugin, 2. a default value set to ISO-8859-1 (inst

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 Is there any overlap with the tool chain proposal ? Nico 2008/4/5, Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > Since the discussion on the list about Maven and encoding 2 weeks ago, > Benjamin and I worked on a proposal to have: > 1. a central point of configuration of sources encoding,

[VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-05 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi, Since the discussion on the list about Maven and encoding 2 weeks ago, Benjamin and I worked on a proposal to have: 1. a central point of configuration of sources encoding, to be used by each and every plugin, 2. a default value set to ISO-8859-1 (instead of platform encoding) to have build

Fixing MRELEASE-128: PluginDescriptor was not found

2008-04-05 Thread Torben Giesselmann
Hi there, I'm trying to fix the bug MRELEASE-128. In order to test my modifications I'd like to run my modified version of the maven-release-manager of course. However, there seems to be a problem with the dependency resolution. While running "mvn release:prepare" on a test project I get the

Re: Fixing MRELEASE-128: PluginDescriptor was not found

2008-04-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
[INFO] The PluginDescriptor for the plugin Plugin [org.apache.maven.release:maven-release-manager] was not found. org.apache.maven.release maven-release-manager 1.0-alpha-5-TSG true or

Fixing MRELEASE-128: PluginDescriptor was not found

2008-04-05 Thread Torben Giesselmann
Hi there, I'm trying to fix the bug MRELEASE-128. In order to test my modifications I'd like to run my modified version of the maven-release-manager of course. However, there seems to be a problem with the dependency resolution. While running "mvn release:prepare" on a test project I get the

[ANN] Maven Eclipse Plugin 2.5.1 Released

2008-04-05 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Eclipse Plugin, version 2.5.1 This plugin is used to generate Eclipse IDE files (*.classpath, *.wtpmodules and the .settings folder) for use with a project. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/ You can run mvn -up to