Re: DOXIA - is the next release ready?

2008-03-14 Thread Lukas Theussl
beta-1 is actually ready IMO, the two open issues are minor and can be postponed. However, I do not understand why you say that MNG-3402 is dependent on a doxia release? The aim of MNG-3402 is exactly to make maven independent of the doxia version. If your intention is to bumb to doxia-beta-1

DOXIA - is the next release ready?

2008-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3402 is dependent on beta-1 getting released. We're about ready to do a 2.0.9 RC. Is Doxia ready to go out the door ASAP? If not, we'll have to bump this one to 2.0.10. --Brian - To unsubscribe

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Now I get it. You seemed familiar, but my brain wasn't kicking in. RSL support is certainly something I'm trying to work through, but I don't think scopes is how it'll happen. I think it'll rather be types in the dependency declaration, as Shane suggested, where some scopes may or may no

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Marvin Froeder
Yes, I'm a user and I spend some time editing the code =D I use since 1.0 (not sure, before code.google site) I need to extends RSL support, because that I'm studing, changing and asking here =D VELO On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thi

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
This is slightly determined by teh plugin. Maven doesn't really clarify this point. I think the latter is probably the more accurate. They're slightly related, though, because, for example, a type will have a default implicit scope based on its meaning. A .ear is a packaging type, for e

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.5

2008-03-14 Thread Dan Tran
+1 have been living on the bleeding edge 2.5-snapshot for quite some time now. Thanks very much for pushing this out. -D On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Siarhei Dudzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > +1 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.5

2008-03-14 Thread Paul Benedict
+1 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Siarhei Dudzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved more than 50 issues: > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13593&styleName=

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.5

2008-03-14 Thread Siarhei Dudzin
+1 On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved more than 50 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13593&styleName=Html&projectId=11133 > Important changes are : > - Add support for WTP 2.0 > - Add support for MyEcl

[VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.5

2008-03-14 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi, We solved more than 50 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13593&styleName=Html&projectId=11133 Important changes are : - Add support for WTP 2.0 - Add support for MyEclipse - Improve RAD6 support - Posibility to discover projects in the eclipse workspace And I cer

Re: Legal files and maven automation

2008-03-14 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:09 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 10, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > Two thoughts: > > > > > > 1) How is the end-year of the copyright done

Re: XBean and DI?

2008-03-14 Thread David Blevins
On Mar 14, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: The additions Dain has made to XBean adds things I was just never interested in like constructor injection and bean factories. Also xbean-reflect "thinks" in java.lang.reflect.Type terms so it's easy to add converters that are generics-awar

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread VELO
So, is possible =D Let me do a question. I can't do configurations like this to scopes, right?! Well, a dependency has 2 attributes. Scope and type. In my original thought is: type is related to dependency's type; scope is related to dependency's usage. Are this thought wrong? What mean the

RE: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 3)

2008-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
It could be, the old one must be lingering. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 5:21 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 3) This is likely a result of the group ID change?

Re: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 3)

2008-03-14 Thread Brett Porter
This is likely a result of the group ID change? On 15/03/2008, at 7:26 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: I had a look at the log for this on the new Hudson installation. There are some weird stuff going on because there are multiple different versions of jars on the classpath. Below I have removed

Re: svn commit: r637049 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

2008-03-14 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
There's no need for maven-plugin-plugin in this pom. It is already in the plugin parent pom. If it doesn't cause any harm I believe it's still good to have for the sake of "better safe than sorry". Especially for those plugins that seem not to inherit from maven-plugins: - maven-release-plugi

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Shane Isbell
That's the default behavior of Maven: extension = type. You can the mapping through an entry in a components.xml file. For example, org.apache.maven.artifact.handler.ArtifactHandler dotnet:gac org.apache.maven.artifact.handler.DefaultArtifactHandler dll

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread VELO
Just a question from a noobie. If I change the type, I'm pointing to a different file or to the same? I always think in the type as the extension. swc means aFile.swc Right? Wrong? +-? VELO On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Multiple artifact types can

RE: svn commit: r637049 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

2008-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
The Trunk doesn't inherit from the plugins parent. -Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 4:47 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r637049 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml There's no need for maven-plugin-plugin in

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread VELO
Just a clarification, For now, deployment isn't my first concern. Now I'm 100% focused on build the SWF (I know, I need to think in future) I think Shane has a good point. If exists any planning to maven supports another languages, some changes are need. Some scope doesn't make sense on Java, b

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Shane Isbell
Multiple artifact types can all match to the same artifact. By using the dependency/type you can change behavior, like whether it is transitive or if it should be linked or compiled, etc. There is no need to muck around with scopes. Shane On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Christian Edward Gruber <

Re: svn commit: r637049 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

2008-03-14 Thread Dennis Lundberg
There's no need for maven-plugin-plugin in this pom. It is already in the plugin parent pom. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: bentmann Date: Fri Mar 14 03:55:47 2008 New Revision: 637049 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=637049&view=rev Log: o Locked down versions of maven-clean-plugin, ma

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
I agree, I just hadn't yet thought through how to handle deployment. Especially since a .swc is a .swf with a manifest file in a zip file, it doesn't entirely map to the maven artifact concept of one-artifact- per-project. Maybe as a classifier... Hmmm. Anyway, we should take this flex-sp

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Yeah, I have to really dig into Toolchains. I was somewhat following the list, but really need to look at the docs to adequately understand it, and how it might affect the flex plugin. But it would be good if we could take my list of 5 and generalize other use-cases (into language-neutral

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread VELO
But to compile, you need the SWC. Your dependency is the SWC, or am I wrong? The artifiact doesn't change. I can use the same SWC as external or as runtime or as merged So, I don't believe changing type is the right decision. VELO On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Christian Edward Gruber

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Shane Isbell
I think anyone developing plugins for languages other than Java is going to run into similar problems. We should discuss and hash out the general issues. A fair amount of what NMaven does is not .NET specific, so we can come up with generalized interfaces, common components and patterns. Also you s

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release maven-shared-components parent 9

2008-03-14 Thread Dennis Lundberg
This vote has passed with the following votes: +1 (binding) Dennis Lundberg, Olivier Lamy, Lukas Theussl, John Casey, Vincent Siveton, Brian Fox +1 (non-binding) Mauro Talevi No other votes. I will start the release process. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi To get the latest version of maven-sou

Re: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 3)

2008-03-14 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I had a look at the log for this on the new Hudson installation. There are some weird stuff going on because there are multiple different versions of jars on the classpath. Below I have removed the ones that aren't interesting: urls[0] = file:/home/j2ee-hudson/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Yeah - I may do that too with the flex thing because a .swf is the normal web-deployable, but a particular dynamic linking approach (called Remote Shared Libraries) uses .swf files as libraries. I may force it by using a swf-rsl packaging type, but I haven't completely figured that out.

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Shane Isbell
I'm not sure the specifics of VELOs problem but I have run into some issues with NMaven for .NET support. There may be cases (like netmodules, or linking of assemblies) where you don't want transitive dependencies, they need to be direct. So it is up to the plugins to decide if artifactType[x]:comp

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
I know one or two things about it. I wrote one of the two maven plugins for it. (http://israfil-mojo.googlecode.com)But you're talking slightly differently, since these aren't scopes, they're linking choices. And some have to do with your deployment and some have to do with your build.

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread VELO
In Flex, we have 5 scopes Merged (Like compile) External (Like provided) Include (Do compile + copy all class from this dependency into my output file) Runtime (Like provided) Caching (Like provided) I use different names to allow me call the right parameter on the compiler. I can't use all

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Why would you actually need other scopes? Don't think of scope, think of use-cases: 1. Need for both compile and in the deployed system 2. Need only for compile. 3. Need only in the deployed system 4. Provided locally for compile 5. Need only during testing What other scenarios would you

Re: XBean and DI?

2008-03-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14-Mar-08, at 2:55 AM, Milos Kleint wrote: is there any document describing the gains of such rewrite? I assume more features and less bugs are an obvious plus of code reuse, but is there more? That there would be more developers working on the core. Dain, and David use XBean extensivel

Re: maven-shade-plugin 1.0 seems to be altering project.basedir

2008-03-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 14 March 2008, Jason Dillon wrote: > Any reason why after running shade that the project.basedir becomes > project.build.directory ? > I wonder if this has something to do with the dependency reduced pom creation. The reduced pom is created in the target dir (so it gets cleaned prope

RE: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
Nope, the scopes are coded into the core and most of the plugins since it's a core concept. -Original Message- From: VELO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:42 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Custom scopes And there is any where to say: "Hey maven, I wanna

RE: [Proposal] mirror settings and file:// repositories

2008-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
We can't change the model in 2.0.x. -Original Message- From: simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 2:58 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: RE: [Proposal] mirror settings and file:// repositories Treating file:// specially smells a bit of "magic" to me. How abo

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread VELO
And there is any where to say: "Hey maven, I wanna change your scopes, I wanna this scopes"? VELO On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "System" scope doesn't exist in Java either. It's not a Java thing, > but a Maven thing, and it just means th

Re: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
"System" scope doesn't exist in Java either. It's not a Java thing, but a Maven thing, and it just means that the dependency is provided at compile time by a local direct path, and that the ultimate runtime will provide the dependency. Christian. On 14-Mar-08, at 07:25 , VELO wrote: Hi

Fwd: Custom scopes

2008-03-14 Thread VELO
Hi guys, I'm developing a maven compiler mojo to another language (not Java, but I prefer don't reveal, at least not now). That language have more scopes (total 6). One (COMPILE) is Java like. But the others have different naming: RUNTIME on Java there is called EXTERNAL PROVIDED on Java

maven-shade-plugin 1.0 seems to be altering project.basedir

2008-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
Any reason why after running shade that the project.basedir becomes project.build.directory ? --jason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XBean and DI?

2008-03-14 Thread Milos Kleint
is there any document describing the gains of such rewrite? I assume more features and less bugs are an obvious plus of code reuse, but is there more? I'm interested in this are especially because I do all sorts of dynamic component replacement within an IDE embedded maven instance.. So I'm wonder

Re: RSS feed for central repo changes?

2008-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
Thx :-) --jason On Mar 14, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: I use this feed http://www.mvnrepository.com/feeds/rss2.0.xml On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there an RSS feed somewhere to track changes to the central repository? --jason

Re: RSS feed for central repo changes?

2008-03-14 Thread Dan Tran
I use this feed http://www.mvnrepository.com/feeds/rss2.0.xml On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an RSS feed somewhere to track changes to the central > repository? > > --jason > >

RSS feed for central repo changes?

2008-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
Is there an RSS feed somewhere to track changes to the central repository? --jason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Generated NOTICE files.... a solution

2008-03-14 Thread David Jencks
On Mar 13, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: David, I deployed a new snapshot, can you give that a try and make sure it's all OK? Looks great to me! - I can't get a blank line in between the project name and the notice Fixed I'm sure I tried that and it didn't work when I did