RE: MNG-2807

2008-03-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
Can you make an IT for it? http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Creating+a+Maven+Integration+Test -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Benedict Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 10:57 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: MNG-2807 Can MNG-28

MNG-2807

2008-03-09 Thread Paul Benedict
Can MNG-2807 (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2807) be considered for 2.0.9 or 2.0.10? It is just to get the section inheritable. Paul

Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4

2008-03-09 Thread Mauro Talevi
+1 Brian E. Fox wrote: It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The issue for this is MJAVADOC-137 (reverted MJAVADOC-104)

Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4

2008-03-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 -- Olivier 2008/3/8, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed > below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as > an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The > issue for this

Re: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 2)

2008-03-09 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Brett Porter wrote: On 10/03/2008, at 6:07 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: I have tested this on four different plugins. There were a couple of typos in the generated report, which I fixed in r635325. I'm assuming that can wait for the next release? Normally I'd let it wait, but in this case it

Re: Share surefire plugin settings for all plugins

2008-03-09 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I just noticed that my fix doesn't work if those properties aren't defined (see my comment o*n MECLIPSE-395*). I don't see how to fix this problem. It's no something that is annoying a lot of people (that's why I'm the first one t notice it) but if someone can help me to fix it or to find a workaro

Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4

2008-03-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 8-Mar-08, at 2:17 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The issue for this is MJAVADOC-13

Re: svn commit: r635240 - in /maven/plugin-tools/trunk: ./ maven-plugin-plugin/ maven-plugin-tools-ant/ maven-plugin-tools-api/ maven-plugin-tools-beanshell/ maven-plugin-tools-java/ maven-plugin-tool

2008-03-09 Thread Brett Porter
Since the POMs included in the artifacts and the stage repository, does this mean the release needs to be started again? On 10/03/2008, at 1:41 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Thanks Dennis. I already noticed this and I plan to modify the tags. Vincent 2008/3/9, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 2)

2008-03-09 Thread Brett Porter
On 10/03/2008, at 6:07 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: I have tested this on four different plugins. There were a couple of typos in the generated report, which I fixed in r635325. I'm assuming that can wait for the next release? /** * The converter to use. * * @component */

Re: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 2)

2008-03-09 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I have tested this on four different plugins. There were a couple of typos in the generated report, which I fixed in r635325. Also a question appeared: Should variables in a mojo that has the @component annotation be included in the report or not? In http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-62

Re: site:stage-deploy asks for a password?

2008-03-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The updated version of the release process says to do a site:stage-deploy > after doing a site:deploy, to create a versioned staged website. > > I'd never done that before; when I tried just now, I was prompted for a >

RE: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 2)

2008-03-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincent Siveton Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 12:12 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 2) Hi, The Maven Plugin Tools projects are ready to be releas

[Vote] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.4 projects (take 2)

2008-03-09 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi, The Maven Plugin Tools projects are ready to be released. It includes the following sub-projects: * maven-plugin-plugin-2.4 * maven-plugin-tools-beanshell-2.4 * maven-plugin-tools-java-2.4 * maven-plugin-tools-2.4 * maven-plugin-tools-javadoc-2.4 * maven-plugin-tools-ant-2.4 * maven-plugin-too

RE: site:stage-deploy asks for a password?

2008-03-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
It seems that Vincent is having similar issues. I know that for many things, you need to use a special url format so Maven knows what settings to use. Similar to the alt.deploymentrepo: apache.releases::default::scp://people.apache.org/ home/brianf/public_html/staging-repository Where the first p

Re: svn commit: r635240 - in /maven/plugin-tools/trunk: ./ maven-plugin-plugin/ maven-plugin-tools-ant/ maven-plugin-tools-api/ maven-plugin-tools-beanshell/ maven-plugin-tools-java/ maven-plugin-tool

2008-03-09 Thread Vincent Siveton
Thanks Dennis. I already noticed this and I plan to modify the tags. Vincent 2008/3/9, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The scm urls are broken for all modules, except the parent. This comes > from the parent pom, which is missing a / at the end of the scm urls. > > > http://svn.apache.o

Re: svn commit: r635240 - in /maven/plugin-tools/trunk: ./ maven-plugin-plugin/ maven-plugin-tools-ant/ maven-plugin-tools-api/ maven-plugin-tools-beanshell/ maven-plugin-tools-java/ maven-plugin-tool

2008-03-09 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The scm urls are broken for all modules, except the parent. This comes from the parent pom, which is missing a / at the end of the scm urls. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugin-tools/tags/maven-plugin-tools-2.4/pom.xml [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: vsiveton Date: Sun Mar 9 07:11:4

Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4

2008-03-09 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Thanks Brian. Vincent 2008/3/8, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed > below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as > an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during releases. The > i

Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4

2008-03-09 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Same here, +1! -- Fabrice - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, have been using 2.4 SNAPSHOT for a long time now > > Thanks for pushing this out. > > -D > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I

Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4

2008-03-09 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's time to release the next Javadoc plugin. Besides the fixes listed > below, the most important change is the reverting of javadoc acting as > an aggregator. This caused most users tons of grief during rel

Re: Populate collection/array based parameters from the CLI?

2008-03-09 Thread Brett Porter
At this point - yes. It would be good to be able to pass these in as a command separated list - but I think that change would go hand in hand with the move from expression to the more specific arguments we've discussed in the past. On 09/03/2008, at 10:59 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi,

Populate collection/array based parameters from the CLI?

2008-03-09 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, I have a small question about the following code snippet from a mojo that requires the expert knowledge of the community: /** * @parameter expression="${list}" */ List someList; Is there any means in Maven/Plexus to actually populate this parameter from the CLI? To my knowledge, only

Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4

2008-03-09 Thread Dan Tran
+1, have been using 2.4 SNAPSHOT for a long time now Thanks for pushing this out. -D On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I consider 2.3 totally and horribly broken, thus it is urgent to get 2.4 > out asap. After that we can move to 2.5 as soon as someone has