Restriction.java hashCode and equals not merged into 2.0.x

Any reason why revision 614706 from John Casey with Restriction.java hashCode and equals should not be merged in the 2.0.x branch ? -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride --

RE: svn commit: r518309 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

The problem is @aggregator, but the quickest and safest is to revert the whole change since it likely expects @aggregator. -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 5:11 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: svn commit: r518309 - /mave

Re: svn commit: r518309 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

Brian and Vincent, are you advocating removing just the one line that added @aggregator, or the entire change related to MJAVADOC-104? Carlos, any thoughts on this? -- Wendy On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I say pull the aggregation out (MJAVADOC-104)

Re: [POLL] Maven outreach

I'm helping out in Commons. Wendy Smoak wrote: I've been monitoring the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for a while and have recently gotten more involved trying to make sure ASF releases are correct both from a Maven perspective and from an ASF policy one, with pgp signatures, etc. (Thanks to Carlos fo

[POLL] Maven outreach

I've been monitoring the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for a while and have recently gotten more involved trying to make sure ASF releases are correct both from a Maven perspective and from an ASF policy one, with pgp signatures, etc. (Thanks to Carlos for doing the lion's share of the repository work--

Re: svn commit: r620419 - /maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/core-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/integrationtests/IntegrationTestSuite.java

Sorry, I should have removed the comment yesterday - I re-enabled the test since you'd earlier fixed it. Done now. - Brett On 02/03/2008, at 10:56 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: I fixed the test in r630474 (a conflict with wrong manifest in Surefire 2.4, caused by maven-shade-plugin, which is fix

Re: integration tests in 2.0.x. was: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Integration Test Executor

Something is wrong with the environment - if you scroll to the start it is trying to use Maven 2.0.7 to run the tests. I'll take a look. - Brett On 02/03/2008, at 7:05 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote: This test seems to work fine in my side. May it be that the 2.0.9 used is not properly built? shou

Re: svn commit: r632588 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-toolchain/

Wendy Smoak wrote: On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is this the home of the code that is currently being voted on? If so then it shouldn't be removed. Here's the tag that goes with the vote thread: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/mav

Re: svn commit: r632588 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-toolchain/

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this the home of the code that is currently being voted on? > If so then it shouldn't be removed. Here's the tag that goes with the vote thread: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/maven-toolchain-1.0/

Re: svn commit: r632588 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-toolchain/

Is this the home of the code that is currently being voted on? If so then it shouldn't be removed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mkleint Date: Sat Mar 1 05:07:10 2008 New Revision: 632588 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=632588&view=rev Log: delete maven-toolchain from shared Removed:

Open call for Papers - ApacheCon US 2008

Open Call for Papers for ApacheCon US 2008 !REMINDER: this will be a short CFP, ending on 3 April, so please be sure to get your CFP submissions in soon! The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) invites submissions to its official users' conference, ApacheCon US 2008, held 3 November through 7

Re: [vote] Release Maven Shade plugin 1.0

+1 Fabrice On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9 > release as well. > > We solved 6 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&styleName=Html&versi

Re: svn commit: r620419 - /maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/core-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/integrationtests/IntegrationTestSuite.java

I fixed the test in r630474 (a conflict with wrong manifest in Surefire 2.4, caused by maven-shade-plugin, which is fixed for the release currently being voted on). Now, I don't understand the comment in code: > MavenITmng1412DependenciesOrderTest.class ); -- MNG-1412 -- this is a > poorly form

Re: [vote] Release Maven Shade plugin 1.0

+1 for the artifact But -0 for the documentation. Any reasons why the layout is not standard? Cheers, Vincent 2008/3/1, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9 > release as well. > > We solved 6 issues: > > http://ji

Re: [vote] Release Maven Shade plugin 1.0

+1 Le dimanche 2 mars 2008, Brett Porter a écrit : > Hi, > > The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9 > release as well. > > We solved 6 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&styleName= >Html&version=13994 > > The remaining issues

integration tests in 2.0.x. was: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Integration Test Executor

This test seems to work fine in my side. May it be that the 2.0.9 used is not properly built? should I force a build in maven-core? On Thu, Mar 1, 0008 at 10:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Online report : > http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=