+1
Vincent
2008/2/28, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
>
> He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
> issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he
On 01/03/2008, at 11:30 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Yes, I'm generally in favour of the proposal - it is how we've
always wanted it to work.
I'm just chucking out ideas.
Yep, I just meant in reference to not needing to distribute stuff in
the core.
- I don't see any point of putting
On 29-Feb-08, at 3:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 01/03/2008, at 9:02 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Here's the direction I would like to go in:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/URL-based+dynamic+loading+of+providers+for+artifact+retrieval+and+deployment
Full support for all types of transp
Unsubscribed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01/03/2008, at 11:10 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Can we unsubcribe it ???
Arnaud
-- Forwarded message --
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 1 Mar 2008 00:06:57 -
Subject: Re: [ANN] Maven Assembly Plugin 2.2-beta-2 Released --> Ref
#[1MFnp02kuP0
Can we unsubcribe it ???
Arnaud
-- Forwarded message --
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 1 Mar 2008 00:06:57 -
Subject: Re: [ANN] Maven Assembly Plugin 2.2-beta-2 Released --> Ref
#[1MFnp02kuP0MEmu]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Thank you for contacting NetZero.
This is an a
On 01/03/2008, at 9:02 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Here's the direction I would like to go in:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/URL-based+dynamic+loading+of+providers+for+artifact+retrieval+and+deployment
Full support for all types of transport for retrieval and deployment
in a standard
binding +1: John Casey, Brett Porter, Jason van Zyl
non-binding +1: Sejal Patel, Fabrice Bellingard
No other votes.
I've released the binaries to the synchronization point on
people.apache.org, and will do likewise with the assembly plugin site
momentarily.
Thanks, everyone!
-john
---
Jo
+1
Works for my assemblies.
On 21-Feb-08, at 11:01 AM, John Casey wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose that we release both the assembly plugin and one
of its shared-component dependencies: maven-repository-builder. See
below for more information on what's included in these releases. I
ha
Here's the direction I would like to go in:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/URL-based+dynamic+loading+of+providers+for+artifact+retrieval+and+deployment
Full support for all types of transport for retrieval and deployment
in a standard way that doesn't bloat out the core.
On 29-Feb-08
The other problem with dropping it into the distribution is that when
we find out there is a bug in it you can't simply specify a new
version of the provider, you would have to go replace the provider and
all its deps, or make your own shaded JAR which would be a pain in the
ass.
On 29-Fe
Hi,
I would like to advertize the usage of java.util.LinkedHashMap and
java.util.LinkedHashSet. Unlike their close relatives HashMap and HashSet,
the former two collection classes offer a deterministic iteration order of
their elements by keeping the insertion order.
In general, clients will be
+1 to putting in on the url, that's a muuuch better solution and works
for all wagons, not just webdav.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 2:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV
On 28-Feb-08,
+1
John Casey wrote:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he's pretty active on IRC, and
he's helping
This vote passed with the following votes:
+1 Dennis Lundberg, Jason van Zyl, Olivier Lamy, Vincent Siveton
No other votes.
I will start the release process.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
like to release maven parent pom r6
On 28-Feb-08, at 9:58 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 28-Feb-08, at 1:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as
1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for
deployment the
On 28-Feb-08, at 4:04 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I'm fine removing whatever you want from core once you can show me
the same use case working without it.
Not a problem, I'll roll it back and use the dynamic collections. I
don't want the core getting bloated out when it's not required.
Correct.
On 29-Feb-08, at 3:28 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I assume this is the current trunk and not the CAP branch?
On 29/02/2008, at 5:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
John/Mark,
You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm
going to start making alphas. I'll take a look at th
>
> Plain PUT does not work if the directory doesn't exist yet. (That's part
> of the HTTP spec).
> You need something to create the directory (or "Collection" in WebDAV
> Terms), this is the MKCOL method.
>
> While it is true that FTP is also a provider, it should be painfully
> obvious that all e
Definitely revert the aggregator tag. It is an uggly pb for many of us.
Vincent
PS: read also the recent Dan's thread
http://www.nabble.com/%40aggregator-mojo-annotation-td15302246s177.html
2008/2/28, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I say pull the aggregation out (MJAVADOC-104) and find anot
Can anyone help answer whether I've missed some subtlety as to why a
fix like this wouldn't work (I appreciate the inner workings of maven
can be a bit complicated...) ?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Nigel Magnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that putting it in pluginManagement do
I assume this is the current trunk and not the CAP branch?
On 29/02/2008, at 5:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
John/Mark,
You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm
going to start making alphas. I'll take a look at the one issue
scheduled for m-a, let you guys add anything
the reason in plexus was because each action was allocated on every
request and not released - I just want to check whether that was the
case again here. I think Olivier investigated it originally - is he
listening here? :)
- Brett
On 29/02/2008, at 7:43 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
Hi guys,
sorry to bother you again, but I resolved it:
in one of the parent poms the assemble phase wasn't attached with the single
goal. I changed it and now the build doesn't get forked.
Once again to all that helped.
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
>
> Well, everything seems fine, the single goal i
I've setup a WebWorkPlexusInSpringObjectFactory to replace the spring
ObjectFactory used by webwork and fix this lookup issue.
The application works for basic requirements (configure admin, display repo
configuration, download a jar from proxies).
Still some exceptions to fix for missing plexus f
Nope, go for it!
Mark
On 29/02/2008, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John/Mark,
>
> You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm going
> to start making alphas. I'll take a look at the one issue scheduled
> for m-a, let you guys add anything you were working on an
John/Mark,
You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm going
to start making alphas. I'll take a look at the one issue scheduled
for m-a, let you guys add anything you were working on and then
squeeze it out to prepare for a 2.1-alpha-1.
Thanks,
Jason
---
+1
-Deng
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:21 AM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
>
> He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
> issues) all over
27 matches
Mail list logo
