Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
+1 Raphaël 2008/2/29, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 > > -- > Olivier > > 2008/2/28, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. > > > > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly > > plugin, and I see his wor

Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 28-Feb-08, at 1:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as 1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment the required libraries necessary for deployment should

RE: svn commit: r518309 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

2008-02-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
I say pull the aggregation out (MJAVADOC-104) and find another way to deal with this. It's far too destructive. Thanks Wendy for looking this up. -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:32 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re:

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

2008-02-28 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (29 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-3313NetBeans projects, more than ant project, more than fre

Re: svn commit: r518309 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

2008-02-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
This change (adding @aggregator) is being pointed to as the cause of many problems with version 2.3 of the Javadoc plugin. See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-137 and related issues. Should all or part of this be reverted? -- Wendy On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 1:28 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
Cool. On 29/02/2008, at 12:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621617466&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621501107&w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/20

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Ralph Goers
http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621617466&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621501107&w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: I checked it in before

Re: svn commit: r632086 - /maven/shared/tags/maven-toolchain-1.0/pom.xml

2008-02-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
Is there some reason you're not using the release plugin for this? Also, it looks like 1.0 was put into rsync'd repository, but I don't see a vote for it. (I see the vote to integrate it and do a release, but we need to vote separately on the artifacts before they are synced to central.) -- Wen

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put that version back on top. Sorry, not quite sure what you mean - can you point me to it? Where do the release notes go? site/src/site/apt/release-notes.apt.vm - I was going to

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Ralph Goers
I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put that version back on top. Where do the release notes go? Ralph Brett Porter wrote: I think this is mostly for Ralph... I wasn't able to find any documentation for the import scope in the site. I was wondering if you could add a

Re: XBean and DI?

2008-02-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 28-Feb-08, at 3:00 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote: Jason, do you want to talk some more about XBean, DI, & Maven/Plexus etc? XBean Reflect (XBR) is really something more akin to Guice. XBR is more complete then what I have in Plexus and I honestly only ever cared about private field inje

Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/02/2008, at 10:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 28-Feb-08, at 2:06 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 8:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Dynamic collections have been there for a while. And why is deploy:deploy-file a concern, and for webdav. This will be the case for all provi

Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 28-Feb-08, at 2:06 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 8:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Dynamic collections have been there for a while. And why is deploy:deploy-file a concern, and for webdav. This will be the case for all providers. FTP deploy doesn't work out of the box either,

Re: versioned documentation, site structure, new and noteworthy

2008-02-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 28-Feb-08, at 3:24 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I'd like to move most of the current site into Maven as versioned documentation. Basically the same as I started for Archiva which I felt worked very well: http://maven.apache.org/archiva/ http://maven.apache.org/archiva/docs/1.0.1/index.

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 -- Olivier 2008/2/28, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. > > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly > plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other > issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention

Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
I think this is mostly for Ralph... I wasn't able to find any documentation for the import scope in the site. I was wondering if you could add an explanation about it to the dependency scope information page? Also, what would be a good blurb for the release notes about it? Cheers, Brett --

versioned documentation, site structure, new and noteworthy

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I'd like to move most of the current site into Maven as versioned documentation. Basically the same as I started for Archiva which I felt worked very well: http://maven.apache.org/archiva/ http://maven.apache.org/archiva/docs/1.0.1/index.html Any objections? I'd also like to work on t

XBean and DI?

2008-02-28 Thread Barrie Treloar
Jason, do you want to talk some more about XBean, DI, & Maven/Plexus etc? I've had a brief look at http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/index.html but some of the pages are thin and the diagrams are coming up with exceptions. - To un

RE: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Petar Tahchiev
Well, everything seems fine, the single goal is attached to the phase: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-1

RE: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
What goal is bound to the phase? If it's assemble then there's the problem. You need to use single or attach instead -Original Message- From: Petar Tahchiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 4:40 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Maven breaks after las

Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/02/2008, at 8:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Dynamic collections have been there for a while. And why is deploy:deploy-file a concern, and for webdav. This will be the case for all providers. FTP deploy doesn't work out of the box either, should be start adding everything because they

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. > > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly > plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other > issues) all

Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 28-Feb-08, at 1:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as 1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment the required libraries necessary for deployment should be dependencies lis

Re: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Petar Tahchiev
Hi guys, I found that after commenting the section containing the assembly plugin configuration in uberjar-12 module, the build gets forked on the next module containing build assembly configuration(uberjar-13). So the problem seems to be in the assembly plugin. I have no idea how is that possib

Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as 1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment the required libraries necessary for deployment should be dependencies listed in the deployment plugin and not wired into t

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
+1 Nice one. On 29/02/2008, at 6:21 AM, John Casey wrote: I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he'

Re: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Petar Tahchiev
That is because the build gets forked before the required artifact gets installed. And the forked process requires the artifact. Niall Pemberton-2 wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> I checked the version of all the maven plugins that a

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Arnaud On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > -Lukas > > > John Casey wrote: > > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. > > > > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly > > plugin, and I see his work (debuggi

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas John Casey wrote: I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he's pretty active on IRC, and

RE: Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
In general I think merging wagons together isn't a good idea. Lets keep them simple and easy to support. The last thing we need is more unused dependencies or worse, bugs in webdav affecting plain ol http. --Brian -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu

RE: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 -Original Message- From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 2:21 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. He's been instrumental in the recent push to release t

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
+1 -- Fabrice - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. > > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly > plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. +1, I already wondered why this had not happened earlier ;-) Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I checked the version of all the maven plugins that are used, and none of the > plugins seems to be updated for the past month. > You can checkout the source of Cactus and try to build it by yourself: > > http://svn.

Re: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1, have seen him in mojoland as well :) On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:21 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. > > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly > plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patch

[vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer

2008-02-28 Thread John Casey
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier. He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he's pretty active on IRC, and he's helping people out on the u

RE: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
If the plugins aren't locked down in the pom, this is what can happen. My guess is that you somehow got a new verion of the javadoc plugin which forks the build now (why did this get changed and why haven't we fixed it yet?) -Original Message- From: Petar Tahchiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Petar Tahchiev
I checked the version of all the maven plugins that are used, and none of the plugins seems to be updated for the past month. You can checkout the source of Cactus and try to build it by yourself: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/cactus/trunk/ I upload the output of the build process. Ac

Wagon changes and WebDAV

2008-02-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as 1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment the required libraries necessary for deployment should be dependencies listed in the deployment plugin and not wired into the core. 2) The wagons can now be picked up with

RE: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
You need to give more info than that. Are you running 2.1, 2.0.x? What's the error look like? -Original Message- From: Petar Tahchiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 12:34 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Maven breaks after last night. Hi guys, my buil

Re: Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > my build was working absolutely perfect yesterday. However, today I tried > to execute > > mvn install > > and the build goes down the submodules, builds them and again starts to > build them one by o

Maven breaks after last night.

2008-02-28 Thread Petar Tahchiev
Hi guys, my build was working absolutely perfect yesterday. However, today I tried to execute mvn install and the build goes down the submodules, builds them and again starts to build them one by one, and so on infinitely. My project consists of three submodules, each one supposed just to

Re: Maven Filtering component

2008-02-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
You just have to make sure that the processing order that happens in the resource plugin matches what would happen with processing of only execution properties in the CLI/Embedder. I can take a look tomorrow or grab me on IRC or I'll forget. I'm in one of my lose track of time modes. On 2

Re: Maven Filtering component

2008-02-28 Thread Stephane Nicoll
I agree with you Olivier. Now I don't know the internals of the embedder. Jason, what do you think? Stéphane On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On 24-Feb-08, at 10:35 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > >

Re: Resources plugin issues

2008-02-28 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to include the new component maven-filtering to do the resources job and add some it tests. Should I create a branch for including the new component ? Other comments inline. 2008/2/27, Paul Gier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Everyone, > > The resources plugin seems be a bit neglected la