+1
Raphaël
2008/2/29, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2008/2/28, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
> >
> > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> > plugin, and I see his wor
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 28-Feb-08, at 1:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as
1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment
the required libraries necessary for deployment should
I say pull the aggregation out (MJAVADOC-104) and find another way to
deal with this. It's far too destructive. Thanks Wendy for looking this
up.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:32 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (29 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-3313NetBeans projects, more than ant project, more than fre
This change (adding @aggregator) is being pointed to as the cause of
many problems with version 2.3 of the Javadoc plugin.
See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-137 and related issues.
Should all or part of this be reverted?
--
Wendy
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 1:28 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cool.
On 29/02/2008, at 12:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621617466&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621501107&w=2
These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor
updates.
Ralph
Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/20
http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621617466&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621501107&w=2
These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates.
Ralph
Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I checked it in before
Is there some reason you're not using the release plugin for this?
Also, it looks like 1.0 was put into rsync'd repository, but I don't
see a vote for it. (I see the vote to integrate it and do a release,
but we need to vote separately on the artifacts before they are synced
to central.)
--
Wen
On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put
that version back on top.
Sorry, not quite sure what you mean - can you point me to it?
Where do the release notes go?
site/src/site/apt/release-notes.apt.vm
- I was going to
I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put that
version back on top.
Where do the release notes go?
Ralph
Brett Porter wrote:
I think this is mostly for Ralph... I wasn't able to find any
documentation for the import scope in the site. I was wondering if you
could add a
On 28-Feb-08, at 3:00 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
Jason, do you want to talk some more about XBean, DI, & Maven/Plexus
etc?
XBean Reflect (XBR) is really something more akin to Guice. XBR is
more complete then what I have in Plexus and I honestly only ever
cared about private field inje
On 29/02/2008, at 10:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 28-Feb-08, at 2:06 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 8:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Dynamic collections have been there for a while. And why is
deploy:deploy-file a concern, and for webdav. This will be the
case for all provi
On 28-Feb-08, at 2:06 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 8:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Dynamic collections have been there for a while. And why is
deploy:deploy-file a concern, and for webdav. This will be the case
for all providers. FTP deploy doesn't work out of the box either,
On 28-Feb-08, at 3:24 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to move most of the current site into Maven as versioned
documentation. Basically the same as I started for Archiva which I
felt worked very well:
http://maven.apache.org/archiva/
http://maven.apache.org/archiva/docs/1.0.1/index.
+1
--
Olivier
2008/2/28, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
>
> He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
> issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention
I think this is mostly for Ralph... I wasn't able to find any
documentation for the import scope in the site. I was wondering if you
could add an explanation about it to the dependency scope information
page? Also, what would be a good blurb for the release notes about it?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Hi,
I'd like to move most of the current site into Maven as versioned
documentation. Basically the same as I started for Archiva which I
felt worked very well:
http://maven.apache.org/archiva/
http://maven.apache.org/archiva/docs/1.0.1/index.html
Any objections?
I'd also like to work on t
Jason, do you want to talk some more about XBean, DI, & Maven/Plexus etc?
I've had a brief look at http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/index.html
but some of the pages are thin and the diagrams are coming up with
exceptions.
-
To un
Well, everything seems fine, the single goal is attached to the phase:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-assembly-plugin
2.2-beta-1
What goal is bound to the phase? If it's assemble then there's the
problem. You need to use single or attach instead
-Original Message-
From: Petar Tahchiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 4:40 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Maven breaks after las
On 29/02/2008, at 8:45 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Dynamic collections have been there for a while. And why is
deploy:deploy-file a concern, and for webdav. This will be the case
for all providers. FTP deploy doesn't work out of the box either,
should be start adding everything because they
+1
Stéphane
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
>
> He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
> issues) all
On 28-Feb-08, at 1:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as
1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment
the required libraries necessary for deployment should be
dependencies lis
Hi guys,
I found that after commenting the section containing the assembly
plugin configuration in uberjar-12 module, the build gets forked on the next
module containing build assembly configuration(uberjar-13). So the problem
seems to be in the assembly plugin. I have no idea how is that possib
On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as
1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment
the required libraries necessary for deployment should be
dependencies listed in the deployment plugin and not wired into t
+1
Nice one.
On 29/02/2008, at 6:21 AM, John Casey wrote:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he'
That is because the build gets forked before the required artifact gets
installed.
And the forked process requires the artifact.
Niall Pemberton-2 wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I checked the version of all the maven plugins that a
+1
Arnaud
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Lukas
>
>
> John Casey wrote:
> > I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
> >
> > He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> > plugin, and I see his work (debuggi
+1
-Lukas
John Casey wrote:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he's pretty active on IRC, and
In general I think merging wagons together isn't a good idea. Lets keep
them simple and easy to support. The last thing we need is more unused
dependencies or worse, bugs in webdav affecting plain ol http.
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu
+1
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 2:21 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Paul Gier as Maven committer
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release t
+1
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
>
> He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
+1, I already wondered why this had not happened earlier ;-)
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I checked the version of all the maven plugins that are used, and none of the
> plugins seems to be updated for the past month.
> You can checkout the source of Cactus and try to build it by yourself:
>
> http://svn.
+1, have seen him in mojoland as well :)
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:21 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
>
> He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
> plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patch
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he's pretty active on IRC, and
he's helping people out on the u
If the plugins aren't locked down in the pom, this is what can happen.
My guess is that you somehow got a new verion of the javadoc plugin
which forks the build now (why did this get changed and why haven't we
fixed it yet?)
-Original Message-
From: Petar Tahchiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I checked the version of all the maven plugins that are used, and none of the
plugins seems to be updated for the past month.
You can checkout the source of Cactus and try to build it by yourself:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/cactus/trunk/
I upload the output of the build process. Ac
I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as
1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment
the required libraries necessary for deployment should be dependencies
listed in the deployment plugin and not wired into the core.
2) The wagons can now be picked up with
You need to give more info than that. Are you running 2.1, 2.0.x? What's
the error look like?
-Original Message-
From: Petar Tahchiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 12:34 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Maven breaks after last night.
Hi guys,
my buil
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> my build was working absolutely perfect yesterday. However, today I tried
> to execute
>
> mvn install
>
> and the build goes down the submodules, builds them and again starts to
> build them one by o
Hi guys,
my build was working absolutely perfect yesterday. However, today I tried
to execute
mvn install
and the build goes down the submodules, builds them and again starts to
build them one by one, and so on infinitely.
My project consists of three submodules, each one supposed just to
You just have to make sure that the processing order that happens in
the resource plugin matches what would happen with processing of only
execution properties in the CLI/Embedder. I can take a look tomorrow
or grab me on IRC or I'll forget. I'm in one of my lose track of time
modes.
On 2
I agree with you Olivier. Now I don't know the internals of the
embedder. Jason, what do you think?
Stéphane
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
>
> > On 24-Feb-08, at 10:35 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >
>
Hi,
I'd like to include the new component maven-filtering to do the
resources job and add some it tests.
Should I create a branch for including the new component ?
Other comments inline.
2008/2/27, Paul Gier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The resources plugin seems be a bit neglected la
45 matches
Mail list logo