2008/2/26, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Agreed. Though it reminds me we really want to improve the links in
> the top right on the plugin sites :)
>
> BTW, Raphaël, is there meant to be two copies of the site? I saw you
> moved it to archetype-plugin, but it's still in archetype-site. I
>
Hi John,
Is the second IT for this issue passing for you? Both I and Continuum
get the following failure:
testMNG3331ModuleWithRelativeParentDirRef
(org
.apache.maven.integrationtests.MavenITmng3331ModulePathNormalization)
Time elapsed: 0.944 sec <<< ERROR
!
org.apache.maven.it.Verific
Go for it. Nice work.
On 25-Feb-08, at 3:07 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Hi
I have a stage site for the archetype plugin.
http://people.apache.org/~rafale/site/maven-archetype-plugin/
any remarks for improvement before real deploy?
Regards,
Raphaël
Thanks,
Jason
-
Yep, it's fine in Continuum and when I build on Linux as well. Just
looking to see if anyone else was getting them.
Actually, it could be related to MNG-3419. I'm not sure why I'm
getting the OOME in the first place though.
Will keep digging later.
On 26/02/2008, at 6:19 AM, Jason van Zyl
Agreed. Though it reminds me we really want to improve the links in
the top right on the plugin sites :)
BTW, Raphaël, is there meant to be two copies of the site? I saw you
moved it to archetype-plugin, but it's still in archetype-site. I
don't think the archetype-site module is needed - t
I say push it. The quick look I did indicates it's already better than what's
deployed so it can't hurt.
-Original Message-
From: Raphaël Piéroni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 6:08 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: stage archetype plugin site
Hi
I have a
Hi
I have a stage site for the archetype plugin.
http://people.apache.org/~rafale/site/maven-archetype-plugin/
any remarks for improvement before real deploy?
Regards,
Raphaël
I assume this is rolling back r630977?
What was the JIRA issue for that change?
Thanks,
Brett
On 26/02/2008, at 8:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdcasey
Date: Mon Feb 25 13:15:07 2008
New Revision: 630996
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630996&view=rev
Log:
Rolling back, as th
Sounds good to me.
On 26/02/2008, at 6:55 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
FYI, I would like to proceed with steps 1+2.
Milos
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to integrate the toolchains proposal into current trunk.
http://docs.codehaus.
2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 24-Feb-08, at 10:35 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Just to be sure mavenSession.getExecutionProperties() should be use.
>
>
> Yes, system properties are turned into execution properties in the CLI
> and pushed into the session. So that
FYI, I would like to proceed with steps 1+2.
Milos
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to integrate the toolchains proposal into current trunk.
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains
> There are multiple steps towards
For the skip flag discussion, I'd refer you to:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Suppression%2C+Ordering%2C+and
+Replacement+of+Plugins+and+Mojos+Bindings
which is something I'm trying to build up to with the refactoring of
the lifecycle support in Maven 2.1-snapshot (trunk). See also:
Looks to be chugging along happily. I'll do another clean build but
Hudson is usually accurate now:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/happy_booty.txt
On 24-Feb-08, at 9:54 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Is anyone else seeing these?
[java] Failed tests:
[java]
testReportInvalidPluginFor
spring has good integration with OSGi to enable Spring beans to be
OSGi services.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Ludovic Maitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brett, all,
>
> Have you considered using OSGi instead of [Plexus|Spring] ? I'm not an
> expert of one or the other, but i try to do
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't like losing the link back to JIRA. The links in the
> reports in the email are also dead so you can't navigate back that way
> either.
The links to JIRA are still there on
http://docs.codehaus.org/displ
That all said, IMO, the proliferation of "skip" flags into all the
plugins kind of begs for their to be "standard" support for this idea
right in the core. Kind of like, set:
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin.skip=true
or something like that so that ANY plugin could be skipped.
On Monday 25 February 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Then why wouldn't you just configure the release plugin to go where
> you wanted it to go in the lifecycle?
I'm not sure I get what your trying to say.
I WANT the release plugin to consider those projects. If I'm releasing
version 2.1, I WANT
Then why wouldn't you just configure the release plugin to go where
you wanted it to go in the lifecycle?
On 24-Feb-08, at 5:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Actually, I think this is a great idea. I'd love this for our sample
projects for the stuff I work on that we ship with the full kits.
Ther
On 25-Feb-08, at 2:21 AM, Bengali Bengali wrote:
I need to find annotated classes and generate an XML file.
Since i haven't found any good library to scan source files for
annotations.
QDox is awesome. It's what we use actually.
I decided to compile classes -> then run my maven plugin t
Ok I can see this now; I actually had a use case for this in the past.
Just because you do a mvn deploy on a multi module build, doesn't mean
you want to deploy all the modules. In my case, we were using many of
the large wars as intermediaries that where combined at the end. I
solved this by setti
Ok thanks that's exactly what i wanted.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Tomasz Pik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Bengali Bengali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I need to find annotated classes and generate an XML file.
> > Since i haven't found any good libra
Hi,
Why not using the shade plugin instead of removal?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/2/22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Author: olamy
> Date: Fri Feb 22 14:25:07 2008
> New Revision: 630338
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630338&view=rev
> Log:
> upgrade to p-u 1.5
> remove d
+1
Vincent
2008/2/24, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
> like to release maven parent pom r630638 as version 8. A site.xml has
> been added in this release.
>
> Source:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ma
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Bengali Bengali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to find annotated classes and generate an XML file.
> Since i haven't found any good library to scan source files for annotations.
>
> I decided to compile classes -> then run my maven plugin to find
> annotati
I need to find annotated classes and generate an XML file.
Since i haven't found any good library to scan source files for annotations.
I decided to compile classes -> then run my maven plugin to find
annotations.
I have been able to do it instantiating my own classloader (adding it
target/classe
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
[snip]
>> Additionally I would really appreciate if the plugin
> documentation would also document the minimal Maven version.
> Normally you simply notice when the plugin breaks your build
> claiming it needs a newer version. This is especially nasty
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
I still use 2.0.5 daily at the office.
I do have 2.0.7 and 2.0.8 installed too, but there's some bad
juju (re:
bugs) starting in 2.0.6+ WRT corporate repositories, wagon lightweight
http, non-projects (archetype, install-file, deploy-file, eclipse,
etc.
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
> I still use 2.0.5 daily at the office.
> I do have 2.0.7 and 2.0.8 installed too, but there's some bad
> juju (re:
> bugs) starting in 2.0.6+ WRT corporate repositories, wagon lightweight
> http, non-projects (archetype, install-file, deploy-file, eclipse,
> etc...) and also
28 matches
Mail list logo
