(ahem) It looks like I forgot to check in my PMC Member status. :-)
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml?r1=587312&r2=629352&diff_format=h
Also, uh, Surefire 2.4.2 would be cool. [2.4.1 has that @aggregator bug
that Javadoc has, I'm sure we'd all hate that. ;-)]
-Dan
The updated version of the release process says to do a site:stage-deploy
after doing a site:deploy, to create a versioned staged website.
I'd never done that before; when I tried just now, I was prompted for a
password.
[INFO] Generate "Project Team" report.
Using private key: C:\Docum
+1. I just used it to stage Surefire 2.4.2; looks good to me.
-Dan
Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'd like to do the first release of the Maven Stage Plugin. This
plugin is already being used for Maven releases, and although it has
limited functionality, it seems to be stable.
There are four open issue
Vote passed.
+1 binding: Dan Fabulich, Arnaud Heritier, Wendy Smoak, Brett Porter
+1 non-binding: Sejal Patel, Fabrice Bellingard
I'll try and stage this now. [This will be a great opportunity to try the
new Stage plugin... ;-)]
-Dan
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 15 Fe
On Feb 19, 2008 1:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The -sources jar is missing LICENSE and NOTICE files.
I dislike changing anything after a vote has started. If it had been
the main artifact I would definitely have started over with the
release and vote.
However, this time I
I was sitting in the plexus-digester directory and ran:
mvn deploy
-DaltDeploymentRepository=id::default::file://localhost/Users/brett/Desktop/snapshots
On 20/02/2008, at 11:03 AM, John Casey wrote:
Can you tell me what you tried? It should work with both the -D
parameter and with the proper
Removed in revId: 629280
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml?
r1=587312&r2=629280&diff_format=h
On Feb 19, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
Also, I would like to remove since it is not a
Maven TLP jira. WDYT?
Anyway, I'm +1 and thanks for this Dennis!
Can you tell me what you tried? It should work with both the -D
parameter and with the property that I tried...my attempt doesn't
work, but yours does, apparently?
In any case, this modification doesn't make any difference if the
deploy plugin is fixed, but in the meantime will enable this
Ah, it's already in the maven pom.xml...
-john
On Feb 19, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
Also, I would like to remove since it is not a
Maven TLP jira. WDYT?
Anyway, I'm +1 and thanks for this Dennis!
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/2/19, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
To g
+1 to the removal of issueManagement. I can add that back into the
maven pom.xml.
-john
On Feb 19, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
Also, I would like to remove since it is not a
Maven TLP jira. WDYT?
Anyway, I'm +1 and thanks for this Dennis!
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/2/19, Den
That only affects the release repository. You can test it with this:
http://www.commonjava.org/~jdcasey/code/java/maven/examples/deploy-
test.tar.gz
When you open that sample project, you'll need to run:
mvn -s ./settings.xml deploy
If the normal override is working, it should deploy to /tmp
I just tried it and it seems to work for everything except updating
the build number - probably because it retrieves it from somewhere
other than the deployment repo. Probably a bug in the deploy plugin
that should be fixed instead?
- Brett
On 20/02/2008, at 10:10 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It doesn't work for snapshots iirc.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:53 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven-parent pom 8
What's wrong with the altDeploymentRepository setting of the deploy
plug
On 19-Feb-08, at 2:56 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
Also, I would like to remove since it is not a
Maven TLP jira. WDYT?
+1
Each individual project should have their own.
Anyway, I'm +1 and thanks for this Dennis!
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/2/19, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
Hi,
Also, I would like to remove since it is not a
Maven TLP jira. WDYT?
Anyway, I'm +1 and thanks for this Dennis!
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/2/19, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
> like to release maven parent
What's wrong with the altDeploymentRepository setting of the deploy
plugin?
On 20/02/2008, at 9:31 AM, John Casey wrote:
I'd like to add a small change to the parent pom to allow override
of the snapshot repository in the distribution management section
via profile property, so we can run
+1 to the change and subsequent release
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:31 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven-parent pom 8
I'd like to add a small change to the parent pom to allow override of
The revId on that is:
629256
So, the URL I'd propose we use is:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml?
r1=587312&r2= 629256&diff_format=h
Thanks,
-john
On Feb 19, 2008, at 5:31 PM, John Casey wrote:
I'd like to add a small change to the parent pom to allow override
I'd like to add a small change to the parent pom to allow override of
the snapshot repository in the distribution management section via
profile property, so we can run CI builds on a closed system without
the need of people.apache.org.
I can get that in tonight, but after that I'm +1.
-jo
The only problem is if someone figured out a workaround by specifying in
depMgt specifically to override the plugin rev. We should fix this + the
ability to override a plugin's dependency version in the same release so
people at least have an option.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
Is there a reason to not upgrade jar plugin to 2.2 and surefire plugin
to 2.4.1 ?
--
Olivier
2008/2/19, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
> like to release maven parent pom r628845 as version 8.
>
> Source:
>
+1
Tested to generate/create-from-project
on both linux+jdk6+mvn2.0.08
an windows +jdk4+mvn2.0.8
Regards,
Raphaël
2008/2/19, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Rerolled to correct the tag and 2 header issues identified by Brett.
>
>
>
> The most important early issues have been fixed and we nee
I dont think is related, this bug only affects plugins that use
dependencyManagement. It does nothing with the plugin dependencies.
This wold change plugin classpath for all those plugins that have
dependency management, but it will change them to what the plugin was
successfully built with, so I
Hi
To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
like to release maven parent pom r628845 as version 8.
Source:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml?r1=587312&r2=628845&diff_format=h
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
+1 from me
--
Dennis
maven-stage-plugin --> maven-plugins-10 --> maven-parent-7, which uses
maven-source-plugin-2.0.3 which had a bug:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES-26
That's the main reason why I want to push out new releases of the parent
POMs.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
How is the release toolchain not
How is the release toolchain not doing that?
Wendy, did you use the release plugin?
On 19-Feb-08, at 12:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
The -sources jar is missing LICENSE and NOTICE files.
To solve it either add a build plugin in the pom for maven-sources-
plugin-2.0.4 (see below) or wait unt
The -sources jar is missing LICENSE and NOTICE files.
To solve it either add a build plugin in the pom for
maven-sources-plugin-2.0.4 (see below) or wait until the parent poms are
released.
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-source-plugin
2.0.4
Apart from th
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 4:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Wendy
Did you mean for this to go into Maven parent pom?
The URL in your change suggests to me that is intended for Maven
components pom. If left in Maven parent pom there will be URL clashes
between say
On 19-Feb-08, at 9:56 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 5:46 PM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 9:40 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19-Feb-08, at 9:36 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I think you misunderstood. The dependencyManagement is used
On Feb 19, 2008 5:46 PM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 9:40 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 19-Feb-08, at 9:36 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > > I think you misunderstood. The dependencyManagement is used for
> > > project dependencies, fine w
On 19-Feb-08, at 9:46 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 9:40 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19-Feb-08, at 9:36 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I think you misunderstood. The dependencyManagement is used for
project dependencies, fine with that.
When you use a plugin no de
On Feb 19, 2008 9:40 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 19-Feb-08, at 9:36 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
> > I think you misunderstood. The dependencyManagement is used for
> > project dependencies, fine with that.
> > When you use a plugin no dependencyManagement is applied. The cur
On 19-Feb-08, at 9:36 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I think you misunderstood. The dependencyManagement is used for
project dependencies, fine with that.
When you use a plugin no dependencyManagement is applied. The current
project depMan shouldn't be applied because it's only for projects, so
that
I think you misunderstood. The dependencyManagement is used for
project dependencies, fine with that.
When you use a plugin no dependencyManagement is applied. The current
project depMan shouldn't be applied because it's only for projects, so
that's ok.
The problem comes when a plugin is built usi
On 19-Feb-08, at 9:07 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 7:46 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18-Feb-08, at 11:54 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback in MNG-3410, particularly from John as
he has been working on this.
If you build and install a pl
On 19/02/2008, at 9:50 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
My rule of thumb is to _always_ run the tests twice, once with
coverage and
once without. The test failure during the second (instrumented)
execution
should not fail the build.
Yes, this is the recommendation I always make too, to ensure
On Feb 19, 2008 7:46 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 18-Feb-08, at 11:54 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
> > I'd like to get some feedback in MNG-3410, particularly from John as
> > he has been working on this.
> >
> > If you build and install a plugin with managed versions that aff
On 20/02/2008, at 1:36 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
nicolas de loof wrote:
"Integrate RedBack / Spring into Archiva."
What is the advantage of redback compared to spring-security (aka
"acegi") ?
spring-security allready supports role-based secutiry, DB user
store and
"remember me".
Nico.
On 18-Feb-08, at 11:54 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback in MNG-3410, particularly from John as
he has been working on this.
If you build and install a plugin with managed versions that affect
plugin transitive dependencies, when it's used the dependency
management is ign
+1
Andy
On 18 Feb 2008, at 17:38, Lukas Theussl wrote:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Benjamin.
During the last few months, he has provided patches in so many areas
of Maven that I can't list them all here (various plugins, surefire,
doxia,...), including documentation and t
I also know that in terms of pom specified property files, it's last wins
currently.
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:37 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Maven Filtering component
I guess we should have a loo
+1
Lukas Theussl wrote:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Benjamin.
During the last few months, he has provided patches in so many areas of
Maven that I can't list them all here (various plugins, surefire,
doxia,...), including documentation and translations, and he has not
been a
Yep sure.
Currently, the new component use the same strategy as the
maven-resources-plugin.
--
Olivier
2008/2/19, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I guess we should have a look to the way this is done currently to
> avoid breaking the backward compat.
>
> On Feb 19, 2008 11:30 AM, Olivier L
On Feb 18, 2008 8:03 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/02/2008, at 3:15 AM, John Casey wrote:
> Things like:
> - running the tests twice by necessity
Having being burned by this little foible...
I often see people complain that the code coverage tools runs the unit tests
twice
I guess we should have a look to the way this is done currently to
avoid breaking the backward compat.
On Feb 19, 2008 11:30 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, could be better.
> But we have to agree on the order :
> * System Properties
> * pom.properties
> * List of properties (
Sure, could be better.
But we have to agree on the order :
* System Properties
* pom.properties
* List of properties ( the method has a parameter which accept a List
of String -> path properties files ) (war plugin use it to pass a list
of properties file).
* pom.filters
* pom.build.filters
?
--
This one was very much expected, thanks for doing this.
However, I think that we should use a first-win strategy, otherwise
there is no way to control the actual value of a property. First-win
strategy is mainly used everywhere in the war plugin and ease a lot of
stuff
Is there any reason you cho
Hi,
As you know some plugins made some filtering base on the code coming
from the maven-resources-plugin.
This means there are some copy and paste from the resources plugin
source to other plugins.
To prevent this, the code from the resources plugin has been put in a
plexus component (currently in
Hi All,
Any chance someone could have a look at SCM-355? There is patch including
documentation available...
Siarhei
+1.
--
Olivier
2008/2/19, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1
>
> On 18-Feb-08, at 8:58 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
> > I'd like to do the first release of the Maven Stage Plugin. This
> > plugin is already being used for Maven releases, and although it has
> > limited functionality, it seems t
50 matches
Mail list logo
