Re: Merging shitty-maven-plugin and maven-invoker-plugin was [Re: [MECLIPSE] refactor IT tests to use shitty maven plugin ?]

2008-01-21 Thread Jason Dillon
As mentioned before I'm not a big fan of merging these plugins. IMO, SHITTY provides a lot of additional functionality on top of what the maven-invoker-plugin provides, like: * Groovy integration * More flexible configuration * Clean and install support integrated (for less pom.xml conf

Re: Min version of maven required for plugins

2008-01-21 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Done : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-67 Thx Arnaud On Jan 21, 2008 8:11 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > Can we add in each announcement of a plugin (or library) the minimum > > version of maven required to use it. > > +1 >

Re: Min version of maven required for plugins

2008-01-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi Team, Can we add in each announcement of a plugin (or library) the minimum version of maven required to use it. +1 Excellent idea. For each new release of a plugin I have to test it with our maven 2.0.5 to see if it is compatible (which isn't the case for the ja

Min version of maven required for plugins

2008-01-21 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Team, Can we add in each announcement of a plugin (or library) the minimum version of maven required to use it. For each new release of a plugin I have to test it with our maven 2.0.5 to see if it is compatible (which isn't the case for the jar plugin 2.2 for example). Couldn't we automat

Re: 2.0.8 and release plugin bug status

2008-01-21 Thread dhoffer
Thanks but I have a hard time understanding this to be the fundamental failure mode. I have verified that for all build plugins (except site) we use fixed versions. (Although we give up automatic updates by doing this what we gain is repeatable builds where plugins used are always the same.)