On 13-Jan-08, at 8:01 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
It says that that the notice is used for 3rd party requirements,
what's so unclear about that?
I wouldn't spend much time on this. Only a lawyer is going to know
and
there is always time for us to change anything that's incorrect.
If you wan
On Jan 13, 2008 5:59 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 13-Jan-08, at 5:25 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > As mentioned by Simon on the release thread for maven-jar-plugin,
> > there has been discussions [1] over at Apache Commons regarding the
> > apache-jar-resource-b
Hello,
The moves occurred at revisions 611641 and 611642
Regards,
Raphaël
2008/1/12, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> The vote has passed with:
>
> Binding: Brian, Jason, John
> Non binding: Milos, Nicolas, Olivier
>
> People counted according to http://maven.apache.org/team-li
Thanks,
i did it for myself
Raphaël
2008/1/12, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >I think Mauro and myself should add us in that list ;-)
> That comes from the maven pom, which you can modify yourself ;-)
>
On 13-Jan-08, at 5:25 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
As mentioned by Simon on the release thread for maven-jar-plugin,
there has been discussions [1] over at Apache Commons regarding the
apache-jar-resource-bundle [2].
The issue that people have pointed out there, is that the generated
Hi
As mentioned by Simon on the release thread for maven-jar-plugin, there
has been discussions [1] over at Apache Commons regarding the
apache-jar-resource-bundle [2].
The issue that people have pointed out there, is that the generated
NOTICE file includes more stuff than they think it shou
I will start another thread about this issue, please post any further
comments on this subject there.
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
I think this debate occured here [1].
The trouble looks to be this file [2] (which just says this apache
product includes/uses an other apache product).
--
Olivier
[1]
Hi,
I think this debate occured here [1].
The trouble looks to be this file [2] (which just says this apache
product includes/uses an other apache product).
--
Olivier
[1]
http://markmail.org/message/vqxdwrrva3b2c2rh?q=%5BVOTE%5D+Release+commons-fileupload+1%2E2%2E1+(rc3)+
[2] http://people.apac
+1 on that.
for embedded use in IDEs there's additional pitfalls.
1. use of System.getProperties()
2. java.lang.Runtime's shutdown hooks.
Milos
On Jan 13, 2008 10:21 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> After some months of reporting issues for Maven, I have n
Dear developers,
After some months of reporting issues for Maven, I have noticed common bugs
in various plugins. For me it seems that many developers are either
completely unaware of the problems (i.e. do not handle them at all) or are
misunderstanding them (i.e. handle them insufficiently). Ther
+1
Stéphane
On 1/13/08, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In preparation for releasing the dependency plugin, I'd like to release
> the maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0. This has a few fixes documented under
> the latest mdep release.
>
>
>
> Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brianf/stagi
11 matches
Mail list logo
