Re: Splitting the website and documentation

2007-12-28 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/12/2007, at 1:35 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On Dec 28, 2007 7:18 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sounds good! Is this a separate module under continuum trunk (something like continuum-docs), or a separate trunk? I'm assuming you are doing something similar to the archiva site.

Re: Splitting the website and documentation

2007-12-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Dec 28, 2007 7:18 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds good! Is this a separate module under continuum trunk > (something like continuum-docs), or a separate trunk? > > I'm assuming you are doing something similar to the archiva site. I was just going to leave it under continuu

Re: Splitting the website and documentation

2007-12-28 Thread Brett Porter
Sounds good! Is this a separate module under continuum trunk (something like continuum-docs), or a separate trunk? I'm assuming you are doing something similar to the archiva site. Cheers, Brett On 29/12/2007, at 12:06 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: It looks like this work was already started, and

Splitting the website and documentation

2007-12-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
It looks like this work was already started, and the versioned docs are under documentation/1_1. I'm planning to move that versioned documentation (the usage and admin guides, etc.) to a separate module. -- Wendy

RE: How to handle plexus-container-default and plexus-components-api dependencies in a shared component?

2007-12-28 Thread Brian E. Fox
Just exclude the api jar. I had to do this in maven-dependency and I setup an enforcer rule to alert me if the jar creeps back in so I can stamp it out. Take a look at the mdep pom to see. -Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 3

Re: How to handle plexus-container-default and plexus-components-api dependencies in a shared component?

2007-12-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Jason van Zyl wrote: > I have eliminated the second JAR from newer versions of Plexus, it was a > complete disaster separating the two and caused so many problems. Yes, I know the story. > For your case below can you not used the older version of plexus that > was a single JAR? The newer versions

Re: How to handle plexus-container-default and plexus-components-api dependencies in a shared component?

2007-12-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
I have eliminated the second JAR from newer versions of Plexus, it was a complete disaster separating the two and caused so many problems. For your case below can you not used the older version of plexus that was a single JAR? The newer versions of plexus are again a single JAR, but some pl

How to handle plexus-container-default and plexus-components-api dependencies in a shared component?

2007-12-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi I'm going through the dependencies for shared/maven-archiver. Is a shared component in danger of dragging in a wrong version of plexus-container-default or plexus-components-api? The MavenArchiver class is not a plexus component itself, it doesn't use plexus directly - only through its depende

Re: how to bypass dependency resolution ?

2007-12-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 22 Dec 07, at 12:09 PM 22 Dec 07, nicolas de loof wrote: Seems I have missed some interesting threads on the dev list ! What is this "build plan" ? Is this related to http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains I didn't find proposal / description of this mechanism on http://docs.cod

Re: Not able to start with the basic program

2007-12-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Dec 26, 2007 10:16 PM, Satya Prasad Sahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am a new user to the Maven. > > I tried to write a sample program to start with. But failing with the > initial set up of Maven. I replied on the users list. If you're not already subscribed, you can see it in the Nabble

Re: Reading another plugins configuration: there's a patch available that does this

2007-12-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 28 Dec 07, at 2:52 AM 28 Dec 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On 27 Dec 07, at 4:02 PM 27 Dec 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi I've been applying patches to the pmd-plugin from Xavier Le Vourch. The patches have been of good quality. Now I'm looking at a patch for http:/

Not able to start with the basic program

2007-12-28 Thread Satya Prasad Sahu
Hi , I am a new user to the Maven. I tried to write a sample program to start with. But failing with the initial set up of Maven. I have gone through the SwiXAT user guide and I am trying to execute the steps as given in the chapter 4 of the guide. But I am stacked at mvn jar:install command

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker plugin version 1.1

2007-12-28 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Arnaud On Dec 20, 2007 10:32 AM, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > -Lukas > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to release maven-invoker-plugin 1.1. > > This release fixes some bugs and makes some improvements. The last > release was made over 1 year ago. > > > > W

Re: Reading another plugins configuration: there's a patch available that does this

2007-12-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Brett Porter wrote: > That's the current "standard practice" I think (doesn't the IDEA plugin > already do it? That would be a good place to copy behaviour from for > consistency). No, it just has a @todo comment: "would be good to use the compilation source if possible" > > Toolchains should m

Re: Reading another plugins configuration: there's a patch available that does this

2007-12-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On 27 Dec 07, at 4:02 PM 27 Dec 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I've been applying patches to the pmd-plugin from Xavier Le Vourch. The >> patches have been of good quality. >> >> Now I'm looking at a patch for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPMD-63 >> which rea

Re: Reading another plugins configuration: there's a patch available that does this

2007-12-28 Thread Tom Huybrechts
On Dec 28, 2007 1:02 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I've been applying patches to the pmd-plugin from Xavier Le Vourch. The > patches have been of good quality. > > Now I'm looking at a patch for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPMD-63 > which reads the jdk source level fr