I created a few integration-tests for the jar-plugin using the Maven
Embedder as described in
http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-testing-plugins.html
under both maven-it-plugin and maven-plugin-test-plugin (I didn't use
any testing plugins, just the install-plugin). Add the Embedder to
yo
You forgot the maven-plugin-testing-harness ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:07 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Invoker vs. Verifier?
John Casey wrote:
> What you're seeing as overlap is a mixture of conce
John Casey wrote:
What you're seeing as overlap is a mixture of concerns in the invoker
plugin. The verifications beanshell really needs to be migrated out to
some sort of proper integration-testing plugin (or, even better, a
plugin that unites invoker and verifier under a common
configuratio
+1
Thanks for heading this up. I've been using snapshots of the invoker
for some time now, and it seems completely stable for my purposes.
-john
On Dec 11, 2007, at 5:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In the preparation of the Maven Invoker Plugin release, I would
like to release maven
What you're seeing as overlap is a mixture of concerns in the invoker
plugin. The verifications beanshell really needs to be migrated out
to some sort of proper integration-testing plugin (or, even better, a
plugin that unites invoker and verifier under a common
configuration...then extend
Forgive me if I'm picking at a sore spot, but can someone help me
understand the difference/overlap between maven-invoker and
maven-verifier?
As I understand it, they both do roughly the same thing, except one of
them is a Maven plugin where you write your test in a goals.txt file +
beanshe
Hi,
In the preparation of the Maven Invoker Plugin release, I would like to release
maven-invoker:2.0.7
The last release was done around one year ago.
Staging repo :
http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-repo/
Vote open for 72 hours.
Here my +1 (non binding).
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
--
Olivier
Oops. Forgot to add [RESULT] to the Subject line.
Dan
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> OK. Finally have the votes to do the release. :-)
>
> We have 6 +1 votes and no other votes:
> PMC +1: jvanzyl, brianf, ltheussl
> Non-PMC +1: dkulp, olamy, jdillon
>
> Thus, this vot
OK. Finally have the votes to do the release. :-)
We have 6 +1 votes and no other votes:
PMC +1: jvanzyl, brianf, ltheussl
Non-PMC +1: dkulp, olamy, jdillon
Thus, this vote passes. I'll get the artifacts moved into the sync
repo.
Thanks!
Dan
On Wednesday 05 December 2007, Daniel Kul
On 11 Dec 07, at 12:42 PM 11 Dec 07, Dan Fabulich wrote:
As you've all heard endlessly by now, we're running a lot of
integration tests in the new Surefire 2.4; these integration tests
are currently designed to just fork/run the current version of Maven
(discovered from the M2_HOME env v
+1 to put the assembly up on the central. I currently deploy the
assemblies ( maven, tomcat, etc ) to my internal repo for automation
purposes
-D
On Dec 11, 2007 12:42 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As you've all heard endlessly by now, we're running a lot of integration
> tests
As you've all heard endlessly by now, we're running a lot of integration
tests in the new Surefire 2.4; these integration tests are currently
designed to just fork/run the current version of Maven (discovered from
the M2_HOME env var or an optional system property) on a set of checked-in
proj
Brian E. Fox wrote:
It would be cool if you could try the new candidate on 2.0.x also. I had
trouble with it excluding tons of stuff when I did 2.0.8. I can try it
later today if you can't.
Built a 2.0.9 snapshot and try it out on a sample projects.
No problems encountered. So it does look pr
Daniel Kulp wrote:
OK. I fixed one more issue with it. Can you give it another try. :-)
Getting closer.
Yup, looks good to me. I've closed MSHADE-5 again.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
It would be cool if you could try the new candidate on 2.0.x also. I had
trouble with it excluding tons of stuff when I did 2.0.8. I can try it
later today if you can't.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 11:51 AM
To: dev@maven.
OK. I fixed one more issue with it. Can you give it another try. :-)
Getting closer.
Dan
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> Fixed on my end (I think... this bug is finicky); try it on your end
> to make sure I didn't break anything further?
>
> -Dan
>
> Dan Fabulich wro
Fixed on my end (I think... this bug is finicky); try it on your end to
make sure I didn't break anything further?
-Dan
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
I changed the rename logic to do a whole bunch of fallback things if the
first rename fails. It first will try a gc to see if any
Mauro Talevi wrote:
I've commented on MSHADE-7 - as far as I can tell, feature is already
implemented, via shadedArtifact attachment. Please try out the configuration
in:
MSHADE-7 is a very different feature from shadedArtifactAttached.
MSHADE-7 suggests that the generated classes just get
Daniel Kulp wrote:
I changed the rename logic to do a whole bunch of fallback things if the
first rename fails. It first will try a gc to see if any Streams that
are holding it locked can be cleaned up. If that still fails, then it
will just copy the new file over the old file. Not ideal, b
Dan,
Can you try a deploy with 1.0-alpha-15-SNAPSHOT?
I changed the rename logic to do a whole bunch of fallback things if the
first rename fails. It first will try a gc to see if any Streams that
are holding it locked can be cleaned up. If that still fails, then it
will just copy the new
+1
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
Following Maven release, I'd like to release (again) Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8.
Problem with dependencies order has been fixed.
We solved 16 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11533&styleName=Html&version=13618
The tasks can be downloa
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Uh, actually, I need to turn my vote to a -1. :-( I just discovered that
I'm being bitten by MSHADE-5 (and MSHADE-6) every time I go to deploy
the Surefire 2.4-SNAPSHOT. As a result, I deployed a corrupted
SNAPSHOT... yuck!
I just fixed MSHADE-6 in the sandbox, which wo
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Marat Radchenko wrote:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
Yes, it sure is! I've been bitten hard by MSHADE-5, which I just re-opened.
OK, I've done the deploy from a Linux box to avoid MSHADE-5. The
currently deployed snapshot should work a lo
Uh, actually, I need to turn my vote to a -1. :-( I just discovered that
I'm being bitten by MSHADE-5 (and MSHADE-6) every time I go to deploy the
Surefire 2.4-SNAPSHOT. As a result, I deployed a corrupted SNAPSHOT...
yuck!
I just fixed MSHADE-6 in the sandbox, which would have at least pre
24 matches
Mail list logo
