Re: Surefire 2.4-20071210.231259-19 is broken?

2007-12-10 Thread Dan Fabulich
Marat Radchenko wrote: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Yes, it sure is! I've been bitten hard by MSHADE-5, which I just re-opened. -Dan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Surefire 2.4-20071210.231259-19 is broken?

2007-12-10 Thread Marat Radchenko
Build log: [INFO] Surefire report directory: /home/marat/projects/templatemailer/target/surefire-reports Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/codehaus/plexus/util/cli/StreamConsumer [INFO] [ERROR] BU

Re: [VOTE] Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8 (take 2)

2007-12-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 10 Dec 07, at 12:14 PM 10 Dec 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Hi, Following Maven release, I'd like to release (again) Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8. Problem with dependencies order has been fixed. We solved 16 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11533&styleName=Html&

Re: [VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-beta-2

2007-12-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 10 Dec 07, at 8:08 AM 10 Dec 07, Daniel Kulp wrote: Any PMC's folks around? I don't have any binding votes yet. :-( Dan On Wednesday 05 December 2007, Daniel Kulp wrote: I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only change between this and

Re: Surefire 2.4 is coming

2007-12-10 Thread Dan Tran
No problem found in my build using 2.4 SNAPSHOT, good work. But I can't put it on production build thou. We test with latest snapshot from time to time. Thanks for putting all hard works. -D On Dec 10, 2007 4:50 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Tran wrote: > > > Can I assume yo

Re: Surefire 2.4 is coming

2007-12-10 Thread Dan Fabulich
Dan Tran wrote: Can I assume you already have the latest 1.4 snapshot at Apache's snapshot repository? Yes, maven-surefire-plugin-2.4-20071210.231259-19 is latest right now. (Its various other dependencies like surefire-api, surefire-booter, etc. are all deployed at the same time.) -Dan -

Re: Surefire 2.4 is coming

2007-12-10 Thread Dan Tran
Can I assume you already have the latest 1.4 snapshot at Apache's snapshot repository? -D On Dec 10, 2007 3:25 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Surefire trunk currently depends on a couple of SNAPSHOT versions that we > expect to be released in the next couple of days, but other th

Surefire 2.4 is coming

2007-12-10 Thread Dan Fabulich
Surefire trunk currently depends on a couple of SNAPSHOT versions that we expect to be released in the next couple of days, but other than that, as far as I know, there's nothing else standing in the way of a Surefire 2.4 release. It includes more than 50 bug fixes. With that said, the more

Re: [Vote] maven-shade-plugin release 1.0-alpha-14 and move out of sandbox

2007-12-10 Thread Dan Fabulich
+1. This works with the latest Surefire trunk. (It's a pity MSHADE-9 is still broken, but I think it's OK for another alpha; we should fix it for beta-1.) -Dan Mauro Talevi wrote: As version 1.0-alpha-14 has been staged for release, I'd like to call a vote for its release and the move out

Re: Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade

2007-12-10 Thread Mauro Talevi
Dan Fabulich wrote: Well - it was recently agreed that no vote was required for alphas. That's surprising to me... I'd at least post to dev to make sure you don't get a -1. I distinctly remember that alphas should be released with more ease and not the same formality. But I decided to call

[Vote] maven-shade-plugin release 1.0-alpha-14 and move out of sandbox

2007-12-10 Thread Mauro Talevi
As version 1.0-alpha-14 has been staged for release, I'd like to call a vote for its release and the move out of the sandbox and to version 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT. Staging area: http://people.apache.org/~mauro/staging-repo/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-shade-plug

Re: release process

2007-12-10 Thread Dennis Lundberg
olivier lamy wrote: Hi, I'd like to work on release for maven-invoker-plugin (and maven-invoker). For this there are two things to release maven-invoker and maven-invoker-plugin. Does this needs two separate votes ? I did one vote for doxia and doxia-sitetools together earlier. That caused our

[VOTE] Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8 (take 2)

2007-12-10 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi, Following Maven release, I'd like to release (again) Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8. Problem with dependencies order has been fixed. We solved 16 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11533&styleName=Html&version=13618 The tasks can be downloaded from: http://people.apac

Re: [VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-beta-2

2007-12-10 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas Daniel Kulp wrote: I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only change between this and 1.0-beta-1 is to fix the fact that 1.0-beta-1 would not work with JDK 1.4 due to it overriding a method that was final in 1.4, but not in 1.5. Stagi

RE: [VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-beta-2

2007-12-10 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:55 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-beta-2 I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only chang

Re: [VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-beta-2

2007-12-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
Any PMC's folks around? I don't have any binding votes yet. :-( Dan On Wednesday 05 December 2007, Daniel Kulp wrote: > I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the > maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only change between this and > 1.0-beta-1 is to fix the fact that 1.0-beta-1 would not

Re: release process

2007-12-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday 10 December 2007, olivier lamy wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to work on release for maven-invoker-plugin (and > maven-invoker). For this there are two things to release maven-invoker > and maven-invoker-plugin. > Does this needs two separate votes ? One is fine as long as the vote is very clea

Re: Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade

2007-12-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday 10 December 2007, Mauro Talevi wrote: > Dan Fabulich wrote: > > I just posted a long e-mail to surefire-dev about my findings re: > > Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade. I won't repost it here, but here's > > the summary: > > > > Summary: I think we're ready to release 2.3.1, because I can't

Re: release process

2007-12-10 Thread Mauro Talevi
olivier lamy wrote: Hi, I'd like to work on release for maven-invoker-plugin (and maven-invoker). For this there are two things to release maven-invoker and maven-invoker-plugin. Does this needs two separate votes ? I would say that one is enough if staged at the same time. But first, is the

Re: Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade

2007-12-10 Thread Mauro Talevi
Dan Fabulich wrote: I just posted a long e-mail to surefire-dev about my findings re: Surefire 2.3.1, 2.4 and Shade. I won't repost it here, but here's the summary: Summary: I think we're ready to release 2.3.1, because I can't reproduce "regression" SUREFIRE-347, the only bug targeted for

release process

2007-12-10 Thread olivier lamy
Hi, I'd like to work on release for maven-invoker-plugin (and maven-invoker). For this there are two things to release maven-invoker and maven-invoker-plugin. Does this needs two separate votes ? But first, is the documentation here [1] up to date ? Can I do this as I'm not a PMC ? An other newbie

Re: Measuring integration test code coverage for a Maven plugin

2007-12-10 Thread Dan Fabulich
Raphaël Piéroni wrote: My guess is that you should deploy your instrumented plugin in a test repository. That's basically what I wound up doing. For the record, I started by specifying a special local repository in my setting directory. Then I tried just using maven-clover-plugin 3.6, call