I recently added a bunch of integration tests for Surefire. These
integration tests automatically fork a separate Maven process to run real
Maven builds, like the Maven core integration tests do.
This naturally led me to wonder: Does Surefire (now) have reasonable code
coverage? Specifical
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (29 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
htt
You have to use 1.5. I'm going to retrotranslate the JAR. I've tested
it and it works fine.
On 6 Dec 07, at 2:32 AM 6 Dec 07, Lukas Theussl wrote:
Just a heads-up for whoever feels responsible for this: trying to
build maven 2.1 with jdk 1.4, I get:
bad class file: /home/lukas/.m2/reposito
Hi Hervé,
2007/12/6, Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> yes, it has a corresponding commit on trunk:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601096&view=rev
>
> It's not the first time someone doesn't find one of my corresponding commits.
> Do I do something wrong? or at least should I do someth
yes, it has a corresponding commit on trunk:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601096&view=rev
It's not the first time someone doesn't find one of my corresponding commits.
Do I do something wrong? or at least should I do something to have it more
easy to follow?
There is no issue associat
Hi Jason,
On Dec 6, 2007 9:29 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Put this in the user wiki. It's look interesting to discuss but it
> will get lost in this mailing list.
My refined proposal is now part of the User proposals page:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Technology+m
Put this in the user wiki. It's look interesting to discuss but it
will get lost in this mailing list.
On 5 Dec 07, at 1:41 PM 5 Dec 07, Johann Gyger wrote:
Hi,
When I compare the Maven dependency mechanisms with our home-brewn
solution in our company then among others one major thing is
dif
Marat Radchenko wrote:
surefire-providers has corrupt dependency:
${project.groupId}
surefire-api
2.3.1-SNAPSHOT
should be 2.3.1 instead of 2.3.1-SNAPSHOT
Thanks for pointing it out. MNG-2339 strikes again :-)
I'll implement a workaround and re-relea
I see this got released (thanks) but hasn't appeared on the central
repo, any reason for this?
Cheers,
Mark
On 30/11/2007, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Vincent
>
> 2007/11/29, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It has many improvements related to resolution event hand
Trying to build maven 2.1 with java 5:
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 41.793
sec <<< FAILURE!
testRunningScmPlugin(org.apache.maven.embedder.execution.EmbedderUsingScmPluginTest)
Time elapsed: 41.704 sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Encou
Just a heads-up for whoever feels responsible for this: trying to build
maven 2.1 with jdk 1.4, I get:
bad class file:
/home/lukas/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/artifact/maven-artifact/3.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-artifact-3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar(org/apache/maven/artifact/Artifact.class)
class file has wrong
Dan Fabulich wrote:
-0. I can try to fix the three open 2.3.1 bugs sometime this weekend;
if you can afford to wait that long, I think that'd be preferable.
Dan,
firstly, nothing prevents us from releasing a 2.3.2 right after a 2.3.1.
Also, I had asked about anybody in the process of fixi
12 matches
Mail list logo
