Hi,
I confirm binaries doesn't work.
MRRESOURCES-29
--
Olivier
2007/12/4, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Monday 03 December 2007, olivier lamy wrote:
> > I have compilation failure with jdk1.4 :
> >
> > getResources(java.lang.String) in java.lang.ClassLoader; overridden
> > method is fi
+1
--
Olivier
2007/12/5, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> list?
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
+1
--
Olivier
2007/12/4, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +1
>
> On 3 Dec 07, at 4:16 PM 3 Dec 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following Maven release, I'd like to release Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8.
> >
> > We solved 17 issues:
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p
There are still three bugs targeted for 2.3.1. These bugs are there in
2.3 today, so I guess we could live with them for 2.3.1 and ship a fix in
2.3.2, but it sure would be nice to get those fixed.
I think the bugs are currently assigned to Brett. Brett, are you still
thinking about these
Why not see about becoming TLPs also? I believe that last time this was
discussed, it was decided to wait until they were released. If we need
to have votes on jira email lists in separate dev lists, to me that's an
indication of a thriving separate community.
-Original Message-
From: Bret
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list?
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Brett
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list?
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Brett
ok - I'll run a vote on those lists to split them out.
- Brett
On 05/12/2007, at 11:48 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Sorry, I meant the Jira notifications.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 6:47 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subj
Sorry, I meant the Jira notifications.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 6:47 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: separate continuum and archiva commits lists
The commits lists are already separate.
Do you mean notific
The commits lists are already separate.
Do you mean notifications@ itself?
- Brett
On 04/12/2007, at 10:57 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
In an attempt to improve the signal to noise ratio, what does everyone
think of making separate notification lists for archiva and continuum?
Now that both hav
Does this have a corresponding commit on trunk? Issue number?
Just kind of particular about the branch :D
- Brett
On 05/12/2007, at 8:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hboutemy
Date: Tue Dec 4 13:43:06 2007
New Revision: 601095
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601095&view=rev
Log
+1
On Dec 4, 2007, at 6:58 AM, Mauro Talevi wrote:
Hi,
as there have been a number of useful fixes since 2.3, and in line
with the release early-release often, I wanted to gauge opinions
about the opportunity to release 2.3.1 as currently in branch and
postponing outstanding 2.3.1 issues
+1
On Dec 3, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
In an attempt to improve the signal to noise ratio, what does everyone
think of making separate notification lists for archiva and continuum?
Now that both have reached release status, this may also be the
time to
consider graduating them
Yeah, I actually redeployed the new maven-artifact stuff yesterday,
but forgot to reply to this thread.
-john
On Dec 4, 2007, at 5:19 AM, Jon SlinnHawkins wrote:
Thanks Carlos -
grabbed the maven-artifact source installed , and 21 is now
building fine
Thanks
Jon
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2007, olivier lamy wrote:
> I have compilation failure with jdk1.4 :
>
> getResources(java.lang.String) in java.lang.ClassLoader; overridden
> method is final
>
> This method was final with 1.4.
Egads Ick Sometimes Sun can be quite annoying.
Does anyone know if the
+1 for releasing 2.3.1
2007/12/4, Mauro Talevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> as there have been a number of useful fixes since 2.3, and in line with
> the release early-release often, I wanted to gauge opinions about the
> opportunity to release 2.3.1 as currently in branch and postponing
> outst
+1 for a 2.3.1 to make fixes available, and delay other issues to 2.3.2 /
2.4
With the "no-SNAPSHOT" limitation in the release plugin, maven plugin
release cycle should be short !
Nico.
2007/12/4, Mauro Talevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> as there have been a number of useful fixes since 2.3
I say cut a release. The current surefire seems to work for most of my
cases and building maven so it can't be too bad.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mauro Talevi
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 5:59 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Release suref
Hi,
as there have been a number of useful fixes since 2.3, and in line with
the release early-release often, I wanted to gauge opinions about the
opportunity to release 2.3.1 as currently in branch and postponing
outstanding 2.3.1 issues to a 2.3.2. Unless these outstanding issues
are being
Thanks Carlos -
grabbed the maven-artifact source installed , and 21 is now building fine
Thanks
Jon
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
probably somebody forgot to deploy a snapshot of maven-artifact
On Dec 3, 2007 7:06 AM, Jon SlinnHawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any reason why i cannot bui
20 matches
Mail list logo
