An upgrade to the latest HttpClient would be nice. The current http
provider code is 1 major version behind and a number of fixes behind.
-Nathan
On Nov 28, 2007 10:08 AM, jblack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any news or concerns about releasing the existing wagon as 1.0?
>
> Jeff
>
>
> John Cas
yes if you want. we can produce minor updates by upgrading some dependencies
if it helps to improve plugins.
Arnaud
On Nov 30, 2007 7:52 AM, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bad news: jaxen is used in the core [1]
> Good news: Arnaud had already upgraded a lot of deps and attached
> pa
Bad news: jaxen is used in the core [1]
Good news: Arnaud had already upgraded a lot of deps and attached
patches (MAVEN-1797 - 1805), among them for jaxen [2]
Should we work on m1.1.1 with only upgraded deps?
:)
-Lukas
[1] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/dependencies.html
[2] http://jira.c
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
htt
Hi jeff,
What you have to check, it is if jaxen is loaded by the core. If that's
the case, the version in the core is always used.
If not, it is the version of jaxen used by the first plugin loaded which
use it.
That's why we tried for the 1.1 release of maven to align dependencies to
have l
Hi Arnaud,
PMD 4.1 has updated its deps (e.g. asm and jaxen), and I am concerned on
upgrading the plugin. I know you (and possibly others) spent considerable
time aligning the dependencies amongst core and many other plugins. I know
Jaxen was one of them.
Do you have concerns/suggestions on upda
Hi Hervé,
The goal of this branch was originaly to release the site plugin and
MPIR, without an important issue found in the doxia-1.0-alpha-9.
Now that site plugin is out, I dont think that we need to maintain it:
I hope we will release beta-1 instead of alpha :)
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/11/29, [E
Who looks after the hibernate artifacts and their metadata?
org.hibernate
hibernate
3.1beta3
3.1beta3
3.1
3.1rc3
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.2.0.cr1
obviously quite different from ;-/
[DIR] 3.0.1/ 08-Nov-2005 16:27
Hi,
I'd like to release (again) maven-clean-plugin 2.2. All artifacts
respect the Apache release rules (Thanks Dan).
This release fixes some bugs and makes some improvements. The last
release was made over 1 year ago.
Release Notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1112
Hi,
I'll fix these up, I didn't notice.
Thanks,
Vincent
2007/11/29, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> I wish I would have caught this on all the releases in the last several
> months, but
>
> The -sources jar that is generated does not contain the required NOTICE and
> LICENSE files.
I added a redirect for this.
Wayne Fay wrote:
You're right. This popped up on Google search, but it seems to be a
*very* old page. We should probably remove it completely!
The correct url is:
http://maven.apache.org/general.html
Perhaps we can eliminate this page, and forward faq.html to
gener
Kev Jackson wrote:
Hi,
I've just been re-building my project with the new mvn 2.0.8 binary.
Here's my experience so far.
mvn clean install (jars) -> works as 2.0.7
mvn clean package -P (war) -> broken (re-tested on 2.0.7 and
works)
So something has changed in 2.0.8 that has affected surefi
+1
fabrizio
On Nov 29, 2007 4:48 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-1 of the
> maven-remote-resources-plugin. This resolves one critical bug reported
> by Jason Dillon as well as fixes two other issues:
>
>
> Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Reso
+1
Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-1 of the
maven-remote-resources-plugin. This resolves one critical bug reported
by Jason Dillon as well as fixes two other issues:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Resources Plugin - Version 1.0-beta-1
** Bug
* [MRRESOURCES-26
+1
fabrizio
On Nov 29, 2007 8:13 AM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has many improvements related to resolution event handling, using
> the latest fixes in Maven 2.0.8
>
> Release is staged in
> http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo/
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a
Mauro Talevi wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
I need this puppy applied and released for the upcoming GShell
1.0-alpha-1 release, which is a dependency of the upcoming G 2.1
release...
So if we can get this guy patched and published sooner rather than
later it would really help.
I know you are b
Jason Dillon wrote:
I need this puppy applied and released for the upcoming GShell
1.0-alpha-1 release, which is a dependency of the upcoming G 2.1 release...
So if we can get this guy patched and published sooner rather than later
it would really help.
I know you are busy, but can you pleas
+1
--jason
On Nov 29, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-1 of the
maven-remote-resources-plugin. This resolves one critical bug
reported
by Jason Dillon as well as fixes two other issues:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Resources Plugin - Versio
No, the sources should always go out.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 7:33 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Release Maven Clean Plugin 2.2
Actually, the other option is to just remove the -sources jar from t
Done.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Please update the version in the maven parent pom, we should release it later
On Nov 29, 2007 6:15 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This vote passed with the following votes:
+1 (binding): Dennis Lundberg, Lukas Theussl, Vincent Siveton
+1 (non-bindi
+1
On 29 Nov 07, at 7:48 AM 29 Nov 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-1 of the
maven-remote-resources-plugin. This resolves one critical bug
reported
by Jason Dillon as well as fixes two other issues:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Resources Plugin - Version 1
no, when you push it to the repo, please update maven parent pom to use it
On Nov 29, 2007 10:35 PM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what does it mean? delay this release?
>
> -D
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2007 12:31 AM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please update the version in the ma
+1
On Nov 29, 2007 11:48 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-1 of the
> maven-remote-resources-plugin. This resolves one critical bug reported
> by Jason Dillon as well as fixes two other issues:
>
>
> Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Resources Plu
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-1 of the
maven-remote-resources-plugin. This resolves one critical bug reported
by Jason Dillon as well as fixes two other issues:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Resources Plugin - Version 1.0-beta-1
** Bug
* [MRRESOURCES-26] - NPE in remote-resour
Actually, the other option is to just remove the -sources jar from the
staging area and not "release" that. Just the actual jar and the
javadoc.
Dan
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> I wish I would have caught this on all the releases in the last
> several months, but
>
I wish I would have caught this on all the releases in the last several
months, but
The -sources jar that is generated does not contain the required NOTICE and
LICENSE files. Thus, it's not releasable according to Apache rules.
The "fix" is to update the version of the maven-source-plugin
what does it mean? delay this release?
-D
On Nov 29, 2007 12:31 AM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please update the version in the maven parent pom, we should release it later
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2007 6:15 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This vote passed with the fol
2007/11/29, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I noticed that the 404 rule doesn't display correctly the error page
> in this case:
> http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-web-ui-tests/ (with the /)
> The display is correct without the / in the url, ie
> http://maven.apache.org/s
Hi folks,
I noticed that the 404 rule doesn't display correctly the error page
in this case:
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-web-ui-tests/ (with the /)
The display is correct without the / in the url, ie
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-web-ui-tests
Since I am not confident at all to mod
Damn auto-completion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, it was of curse supposed go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] of curse.
Gilles
> -Original Message-
> From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: jeudi 29 novembre 2007 12:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VO
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-clean-plugin 2.2.
This release fixes some bugs and makes some improvements. The last
release was made over 1 year ago.
Release Notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11128&styleName=Html&version=13042
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.or
Gilles,
Any reason why this mail was sent to maven developers list?
Xavier
On Nov 29, 2007 11:16 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This was already discussed, but the conclusion was not clear.
>
> Do we migrate https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy to
> https://svn.apac
This was already discussed, but the conclusion was not clear.
Do we migrate https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy
(core, ivyde and site being subdirectories of ivy)
Gilles
--
Hi,
We had a discussion about EOLs some time ago, I would like to know which
tests failed for you. The AbstractSinkTest (which all sink tests are
supposed to extend) filters out every EOL in the strings it compares (my
reasoning for that was that the case where EOLs are significant is
usuall
Np. Seems to work fine. Thanks for the follow up. I'll watch the
list for the release bits.
Thanks,
--jason
On Nov 29, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Jason,
Sorry about this. I've been on vacation since ApacheCon and didn't
catch this.
Looks like Carlos applied your patch.
Jason,
Sorry about this. I've been on vacation since ApacheCon and didn't
catch this.
Looks like Carlos applied your patch. I also just committed fixes for
MRRESOURCES-27 and MRRESOURCES-28 and deployed a new
1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT.
If you could give that a quick try, that would be great.
Please update the version in the maven parent pom, we should release it later
On Nov 29, 2007 6:15 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote passed with the following votes:
>
> +1 (binding): Dennis Lundberg, Lukas Theussl, Vincent Siveton
>
> +1 (non-binding): Raphaël Piéroni, Ol
ok, just changed my mind. after reading all comments and looking into my
needs now. I can work with with the mapping, specially because i need
only one at the moment.
It is MUCH more important there is a consistent mapping! Than it is that
somebody like me likes it or not.
Just see a lot of work
On 29/11/2007, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It includes bugfixes in the osgi-maven version conversion
>
> Staged in http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo
tested locally: +1 (non-binding)
--
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniar
On 29/11/2007, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It has many improvements related to resolution event handling, using
> the latest fixes in Maven 2.0.8
>
> Release is staged in
> http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo/
tested locally: +1 (non-binding)
--
> I could give you my
40 matches
Mail list logo
