Re: [VOTE] Release maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-6

OK, that embarrasing. It had nothing to do with repository config. I'd forgotten to change the version of the site-plugin in my pom to 2.0-beta-6 +1 [non binding] William > -Original Message- > From: Dan Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 27 November 2007 11:59 AM > To: Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-6

You're right. This popped up on Google search, but it seems to be a *very* old page. We should probably remove it completely! The correct url is: http://maven.apache.org/general.html Perhaps we can eliminate this page, and forward faq.html to general.html to avoid breaking the Google search? Way

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-6

put this in your ~/.m2/settings.xml dennisl-staging Remote resources plugin staging repository http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-site-plugin false and run maven site -Pdennis

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-6

Hmm .. very frustrated now .. I removed the mirror and still see it attempting to download the POM from central (which it obviously can't). It then downloads the plugin from the staging repository. But then never looks for the POM in the staging repository and hence fails with: [ERROR] BUILD ER

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-6

I'm not familiar with using a proxy and/or a mirror, but you also need org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-1.0-alpha-10 and org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-10. Those are dependencies of the site-plugin. William Ferguson wrote: OK, I'm trying to validate but I guess I have some bad c

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-6

That page was published on 30 Jan 2006, so at least it wasn't this version of the plugin. Wayne Fay wrote: I'm not sure what version of site-plugin is responsible for the FAQ page, but if its this version, there seem to be some issues... http://maven.apache.org/faq.html Wayne On 11/25/07, Wi

Re: in repo1 it is available

I don't want to mix all problems. I'm not aware about problems of eclipse jars deployments on the central repository. Actually I just want one jar and I would like to know if it's possible to do it Arnaud On Nov 26, 2007 5:23 PM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you think there's a c

Re: in repo1 it is available

Do you think there's a chance to get also the eclipse 3.3.1 binary jars into this repository? Thanks Felix > Can we upload some jars in the central repo and more precisely this one : > http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/org/eclipse/core/org.eclipse.core.resources/3.2.1/ > ?? > Arnaud > > On Nov 26, 2

Re: copieing sources in to a maven-plugin

On Nov 25, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: yes and no. You can NOT copy files from EPL into an ASL project, or modify them in an ASL project. However you can take a binary (jar) dependency on an EPL binary. So you would have to copy the jar that the source is in. However, the sou

Re: in repo1 it is available

Hi, but it would be better to start with version 3.3.x even if the source we need "now" is unchanged. I checked some other workspace reading stuff and there was a rather good backward compatibility's stuff. Ritchie Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Can we upload some jars in the central repo and more pr

Re: in repo1 it is available

Can we upload some jars in the central repo and more precisely this one : http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/org/eclipse/core/org.eclipse.core.resources/3.2.1/ ?? Arnaud On Nov 26, 2007 4:15 PM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that's right, I still have to polish the eclipse plugin to gen

Re: in repo1 it is available

ah, so we are back in the maven-eclipse-plugin to generate repository from which a dependency we need in the maven-eclipse-plugin. What are the open issues in the repository generation? Ritchie Carlos Sanchez wrote: > that's right, I still have to polish the eclipse plugin to generate > the Ecli

RE: [vote] [take 2] release maven 2.0.8

This vote has passed: Results: Binding: +6 Brian, Lukas, Vincent, Stephane, Jason, Dennis Non Binding: +6 Maria, Mauro, Nicolas, Olivier, Raphael, Fabrice I will proceed with the merging of the artifacts tonight. --Brian -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: in repo1 it is available

that's right, I still have to polish the eclipse plugin to generate the Eclipse repo using some "conventions" On Nov 26, 2007 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK this one is an experimental repository created by carlos. > > (http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=11739368

Re: in repo1 it is available

AFAIK this one is an experimental repository created by carlos. (http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=117393683323837&w=2) 2007/11/26, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ouch, I didn't notice. > It's a maven 2 repository but not the central one. > Carlos, Jason, do you know why the conte

Re: in repo1 it is available

ouch, I didn't notice. It's a maven 2 repository but not the central one. Carlos, Jason, do you know why the content of http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/ isn't available in http://repo1.maven.org/maven2 ??

Re: Trunk of assembly plugin broken and not in synch with deployed 2.2-beta2-SNAPSHOT ?

On 23/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please report this in JIRA, as attachment to mailing lists have a nasty > habit of being forgotten. Done, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-250 I was hoping for some preliminary discussion, so as to be able to create more precise

Re: [Fwd: Re: licensing question]

I put the team in copy because it's important to not do a bad choice. On Nov 26, 2007 12:10 PM, Richard van Nieuwenhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > i just asked Cliff (see attachment) and he says that only binary > redistribution is an option. > > So four options left: > - extraction du

Re: [vote] [take 2] release maven 2.0.8

+1, works fine for me :) -Deng On 11/23/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few > weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with > the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote) > > > > The r

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-help-plugin 2.0.2

+1 -Lukas Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, I'd like to release maven-help-plugin 2.0.2. This release fixes a couple of bugs and improves the documentation. There are still improvements and feature requests left in JIRA, but I feel that they can be schedules for a future 2.1 release. The last re

Re: [vote] [take 2] release maven 2.0.8

+1 -Lukas Brian E. Fox wrote: It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote) The release is staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-r

Re: copieing sources in to a maven-plugin

Hi, where can i find that page? After writing test cases i now know how to read the binary files, almost without the code but i need at least two defined constants "a long magic number". But as far as i know it is still called copying, if i used the original code to see what it does. Does the EP