Hi,
I'm back from holidays, ready to work again :)
Thank you for your votes.
Hervé
Le dimanche 16 septembre 2007, Raphaël Piéroni a écrit :
> Welcome Hervé.
>
> 2007/9/16, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Results:
> > +12 (Jason, Maria, Emmanuel, Lukas, Raphael, Brian, Arnaud, Wendy,
> > O
On 30 Sep 07, at 12:23 PM 30 Sep 07, Mauro Talevi wrote:
This is a comparison with SVN I've found on the Git site:
http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion
But one of the main issues IMO is the integration with IDEs - it
took quite a long time for SVN to catch up to CVS standards.
Unt
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Are you mostly interested in plugins or the core? I will publish them
> as separate GIT repos so I'll do the ones people are most interested
> in first. Trying to jam everything into one GIT probably doesn't make
> sense if people are going to focus on
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
For anyone who wants to make changes to Maven but doesn't have access I
am going to setup a GIT repository to try and enable some distributed
development. After using GIT for about a week I'm having a hard time
using SVN but obviously we're not going to be switching a
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 30 Sep 07, at 12:41 AM 30 Sep 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why, and says who? These things are not cast in stone and we have the
ability to adapt the process to make it more productive.
[...]
I don't really care. Sta
So Contegix is starting the process, and SVN needs to be upgraded on
the servers to support git-svn and they are starting now. They should
be done in two hours, and then I will clone and publish the repo. So
let's aim for tomorrow to publish them. I'll find the right legal
goop to make avai
On 30 Sep 07, at 11:04 AM 30 Sep 07, Insitu wrote:
Hello,
Could you publish the git repository address ?
I moved everything over to a Contegix box where it can be supported
and they are just updating Subversion and install the necessary Perl
libraries required for the initial git-svn set
On 30 Sep 07, at 11:04 AM 30 Sep 07, Insitu wrote:
Hello,
Could you publish the git repository address ?
I'm just setting it up on a reliable server and I will get it out
shortly.
Regards,
--
OQube < software engineering \ génie logiciel >
Arnaud Bailly, Dr.
\web> http://www.oqube.com
Hello,
Could you publish the git repository address ?
Regards,
--
OQube < software engineering \ génie logiciel >
Arnaud Bailly, Dr.
\web> http://www.oqube.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Hi Vincent,
I had noticed this already (this bug was introduced with DOXIA-78) but
when I tried to fix it like you done it now, it broke several plugin
reports (btw, zones seems to be down again right now). I don't remember
exactly now which ones, but it was complicated enough that I assumed
On 30 Sep 07, at 12:41 AM 30 Sep 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why, and says who? These things are not cast in stone and we have the
ability to adapt the process to make it more productive.
[...]
I don't really care. Staging a release is not
As an addition to my too quicl vote,
What do we do for the actual opened jira on 2.0-alpha-1 ?
Do we reschedule them for 2.0-alpha-2 ?
I create the jira tag for this purpose, but wait for infos before moving
issues.
Raphaël
2007/9/30, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +1
> I am obviousy w
+1
I am obviousy waiting for feedback.
Raphaël
2007/9/29, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Raphael and I have been doing a lot of work on ArchetypeNG and I
> would like to release a series of alphas before we do the official
> switch over. I think it's working nicely now but still needs a l
On 30 Sep 07, at 12:41 AM 30 Sep 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why, and says who? These things are not cast in stone and we have the
ability to adapt the process to make it more productive.
[...]
I don't really care. Staging a release is not
New are SNAPSHOTs deployed now.
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
This fix is an important issue for report generation. I discussed on irc with
Dennis about that and he will deploy new snapshots to test again MPIR.
If everything will be ok, we think we need to release an alpha-10 of
doxia. What others
Hi,
This fix is an important issue for report generation. I discussed on irc with
Dennis about that and he will deploy new snapshots to test again MPIR.
If everything will be ok, we think we need to release an alpha-10 of
doxia. What others think?
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/9/30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[
Just summing up some stuff I've been discussing with some people on IRC
already: I am working on several enhancements for doxia-beta-1
(DOXIA-137, DOXIA-154, DOXIA-155) which involve some changes to the sink
API and I'd like to test it with the current site plugin (aside: all
tests pass within
On 9/29/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why, and says who? These things are not cast in stone and we have the
> ability to adapt the process to make it more productive.
>
> [...]
>
> I don't really care. Staging a release is not a big deal, just
> invariably pointless for an alpha be
18 matches
Mail list logo
