[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

2007-09-20 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (29 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques htt

RE: site:attach-descriptor in default lifecycle

2007-09-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
I reproduced it with 2.0.7. I know exactly how to make an IT test for this so I will work on that when I get some time. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:56 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: site:attach-descriptor

Re: site:attach-descriptor in default lifecycle

2007-09-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/09/2007, at 8:44 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: I noticed a while back that the attach-descriptor is included in the default lifecycle. Is this really needed for non-pom projects? Yeah, only makes sense for pom projects I think. Also there is something bigger going on. Recently 2.0-SNAPSHOT

site:attach-descriptor in default lifecycle

2007-09-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
I noticed a while back that the attach-descriptor is included in the default lifecycle. Is this really needed for non-pom projects? Also there is something bigger going on. Recently 2.0-SNAPSHOT of the site plugin was added as a dependency to the dependency plugin. When the dependency plugin is

Re: svn commit: r577620 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/archetypeng/archetype-packaging/

2007-09-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
Not a problem I just didn't see it because the old packaging is being used. We just need to fix the reference in the generated code. On 20 Sep 07, at 10:35 AM 20 Sep 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: 2007/9/20, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 20 Sep 07, at 2:34 AM 20 Sep 07, Raphaël Piéroni

Re: svn commit: r577620 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/archetypeng/archetype-packaging/

2007-09-20 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
2007/9/20, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 20 Sep 07, at 2:34 AM 20 Sep 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I am not sure it is not used. > > > > You should be sure :-) I am sorry, but it's my kind of wording to say, that i am sure it is used (double negation hence an affirmat

Re: Continuum on maven zone

2007-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
ok, I updated continuum instance to 1.1-beta-3. Sorry for the delay Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : Hi, In few minutes, I'll stop Continuum to update it to Continuum 1.1-beta-3. I'll send a new mail when it will be back Emmanuel -

Re: svn commit: r577620 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/archetypeng/archetype-packaging/

2007-09-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 20 Sep 07, at 8:30 AM 20 Sep 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: It is used when you install a generated archetype. This was separated from the plugin because it was hosing up the velocity instance by pulling all the plugin into the core classloader. It's not used currently but should be, it pull

Re: Abolishing Extensions in 2.1

2007-09-20 Thread John Casey
I've been thinking about this more, and I really think it's a bad idea to scrap extensions completely. The more work I do on conversions, etc. the more I see that there is a need to tweak Maven here and there for certain projects. A great case-in-point here is profile activators...without e

RE: svn commit: r577620 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/archetypeng/archetype-packaging/

2007-09-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
It is used when you install a generated archetype. This was separated from the plugin because it was hosing up the velocity instance by pulling all the plugin into the core classloader. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 7

RE: [proposal] bring plugin tools together in SCM

2007-09-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 seems logical and I can't think of any drawback at this point. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:31 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [proposal] bring plugin tools together in SCM I'd like to do what we did for su

Re: [proposal] bring plugin tools together in SCM

2007-09-20 Thread John Casey
Sounds fine to me. I think this was the point of shared originally, though I guess the scope was a tad broader (including the apps themselves, not just plugins). The only concern I would have is to ensure that this collection only contains things that have no earthly point other than servin

Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-20 Thread John Casey
Here's another batch comment...sorry for the bursty communication style! :-) Local Repo Separation Notes: 1. Having a strict (automatic) one-workspace-per-build approach kills any idea of having integration-test runs that themselves have predictable, isolated environments, and puts us back

Re: svn commit: r577620 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/archetypeng/archetype-packaging/

2007-09-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 20 Sep 07, at 2:34 AM 20 Sep 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: Hi I am not sure it is not used. You should be sure :-) Nothing in the tests exercised it, or referenced it. I'm about to try and make a bunch of archetypes so I will soon find out. Because the creator (at least before your co

Re: Continuum on maven zone

2007-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Dimitris Kapanidis a écrit : Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, In few minutes, I'll stop Continuum to update it to Continuum 1.1-beta-3. I'll send a new mail when it will be back I suppose you mean Continuum 1.1-beta-2, in continuum site I cannot find beta-3. No, it's 1.1-beta-3. We started the

Re: Continuum on maven zone

2007-09-20 Thread Dimitris Kapanidis
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, In few minutes, I'll stop Continuum to update it to Continuum 1.1-beta-3. I'll send a new mail when it will be back I suppose you mean Continuum 1.1-beta-2, in continuum site I cannot find beta-3. dimitris Emmanuel --

Re: svn commit: r577620 - /maven/sandbox/trunk/archetypeng/archetype-packaging/

2007-09-20 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi I am not sure it is not used. Because the creator (at least before your commits) creates the archetypes using the maven-archetype packaging which was defined in this module. Then the archetypes are installed against that packaging. Raphaël 2007/9/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >

Re: Path to 2.1-alpha-1

2007-09-20 Thread Vincent Massol
I'd be very happy to help you test what's in 2.1 trunk on the XWiki build. We're currently stuck with an old 2.1-SNAPSHOT, using an older version fails and a newer snapshots fails too ;) Actually last time I tried (about 1 to 2 weeks ago) it was failing immediately since parent dependencies

Re: Abolishing Extensions in 2.1

2007-09-20 Thread Milos Kleint
I might have another usecase in toolchains (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains) A toolchain definition that is not part of the default set needs to be added as extension to the build. It's accessed by multiple plugins and therefore it's rather impractical to add it as dependency to e

Re: Abolishing Extensions in 2.1

2007-09-20 Thread Vincent Massol
On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: Hi Jason, How would you implement the XWiki use case, namely the ability to add XAR file format support? Right now it's using an extension to: 1) define a lifecycle 2) define an Archiver format implementation ooops... sorry I spoke too fa

Re: Abolishing Extensions in 2.1

2007-09-20 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Jason, How would you implement the XWiki use case, namely the ability to add XAR file format support? Right now it's using an extension to: 1) define a lifecycle 2) define an Archiver format implementation Thanks -Vincent On Sep 4, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: After trying to

Re: pre-configuring self written plugins

2007-09-20 Thread Andrew Williams
Then I would configure the plugin in a group-specific parent pom. That way each team has it pre-configured the way they want. Andy On 20 Sep 2007, at 05:30, Jens Rapp wrote: i'm juggling with some svn repositories and pathes inside and outside them so i have several similar classes inside my

Continuum on maven zone

2007-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Hi, In few minutes, I'll stop Continuum to update it to Continuum 1.1-beta-3. I'll send a new mail when it will be back Emmanuel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]