Re: RE: pre-configuring self written plugins

2007-09-19 Thread Jens Rapp
i'm juggling with some svn repositories and pathes inside and outside them so i have several similar classes inside my mojo. because there are at least two small groups of people in my company which are using other repositories than the others, I need to configure them. But currently I don't kno

Re: summary regarding plugin pack proposal

2007-09-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
Let it be implemented as tooling which doesn't affect the core and people will decide what they like to use. The enforcer plugin addition goes a long way. A simple tool for creating a block with the latest releases I am making now for a client. People can compose these tools as they wish to

[proposal] bring plugin tools together in SCM

2007-09-19 Thread Brett Porter
I'd like to do what we did for surefire and bring all the following into one tree, called /plugin-tools/trunk, versioned consistently as 2.4 and using MPLUGIN as the JIRA project: * plugins/maven-plugin-plugin * shared/maven-plugin-* * shared/maven-script Thoughts? Cheers, Brett -- Brett Po

summary regarding plugin pack proposal

2007-09-19 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, This is the best summary I can get from the discussion earlier this month about this proposal: - in terms of having some way to simplify specifying a group of plugins: 4 in favour, 3 against, 1 on the fence and 2 that wanted a compromise (a plugin to automate snippet injection) - in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Local Repository Separation

2007-09-19 Thread Brett Porter
On 18/09/2007, at 10:22 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, 2. Workspaces should be something you have to set consciously, not automatically created. This allows an integration-testing run (for example) to run in isolation by using a different workspace id, and clean up after itself when fin

Re: RE: pre-configuring self written plugins

2007-09-19 Thread Wayne Fay
The defaults are in the source code, as you mentioned. Which will require compilation to change. So it sounds like your "requirements" cannot be met currently. Why don't you explain what exactly you're trying to achieve, and perhaps someone will have an alternate suggestion? Wayne On 9/19/07, Je

Re: Modify the Super Pom from Plugin

2007-09-19 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
On 19/09/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 19 Sep 07, at 9:09 AM 19 Sep 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > > Hi Jason, > > > > Just make your archetypes redefine those directories. Or deploy a > parent for all your maven-based grails projects that inherit from a > POM with all the

Re: RE: pre-configuring self written plugins

2007-09-19 Thread Jens Rapp
well, i did this but i couldn't find where to set them- besides the declaration in the plugin's source code but i would have to recompile the plugin if those parameters are changed.. can you tell me where to find these defaults? Original-Nachricht > Datum: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09

Re: Modify the Super Pom from Plugin

2007-09-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 19 Sep 07, at 9:09 AM 19 Sep 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi Jason, Just make your archetypes redefine those directories. Or deploy a parent for all your maven-based grails projects that inherit from a POM with all the overrides. Changing the super POM is a bad, bad, bad, bad idea.

RE: Modify the Super Pom from Plugin

2007-09-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
What happens if you modified the super pom and included it an extension? Which would take precedence? -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:09 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Modify the Super Pom from Plugin Hi

Re: Modify the Super Pom from Plugin

2007-09-19 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Jason, I was quite sure to have this reply and this is normal. I explain my problem. A Grails project has actually its own directories layout that isn't at all compatible with maven standards (and it sucks a little bit). It's something like that : %PROJECT_HOME% + grails-app

Re: Javadoc plugin and default Plexus Commandline

2007-09-19 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Hi Vincent, in Maven 2.0.x, it is not possible to add a dependency to a plugin in the reporting section. And if you put it in the pluginManagement section, this doesn't work either. (see bug MNG-1931) So that's why I don't see a solution to that... :-( Cheers, Fabrice. On 9/19/07, Vincent Sivet

Re: Modify the Super Pom from Plugin

2007-09-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 18 Sep 07, at 12:11 PM 18 Sep 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi guys, Is it possible within a plugin to modify the default settings of the Super Pom (default directories, ..) ? Any idea ? No, and why would you want to do that? The Super POM is immutable for all intents and purposes.

RE: pre-configuring self written plugins

2007-09-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
Parameters in your plugins can have defaults. Take a look at any of the maven plugins for examples. -Original Message- From: Jens Rapp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 8:29 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: pre-configuring self written plugins hi there! i

RE: Doubt on dowload sources and javadoc

2007-09-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
This is a bug in the latest version. -Original Message- From: José Pacheco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 5:52 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Doubt on dowload sources and javadoc Hello, I'm using maven-eclipse-plugin in a project. The problem is w

Re: Javadoc plugin and default Plexus Commandline

2007-09-19 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Fabrice, PLXUTILS-34 is included in p-u:1.4.6, so try to add it as dependency in the javadoc-plugin. Cheers, Vincent 2007/9/19, Fabrice Bellingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi guys, > > I've just updated some projects that now use Maven 2.0.7 along with the > Javadoc plugin 2.3, and now my buil

pre-configuring self written plugins

2007-09-19 Thread Jens Rapp
hi there! is there any way to pre-configure my own maven plugin so that i am able to create and modify a standard config without re-compiling? i don't want the users to be forced to configure some parameters by themselves. -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Info

Re: Maven deployment

2007-09-19 Thread Richard van Nieuwenhoven
Hi, use the maven-eclipse-plugin for RAD-6 support. I do not know the status of the RAD-7 support. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/ tip 1: Stay with the maven project layout as far as possible! tip 2: extract java code from any war into a separate jar-module (this will

Maven deployment

2007-09-19 Thread Hemant Ved
Hi all Can anybody explain me the steps to deploy ejb using maven with Websphere 6?Has anybody tried using Maven and RAD combination? Can maven follow the directory structure of RAD? Thanks and regards Hemant Ved

Javadoc plugin and default Plexus Commandline

2007-09-19 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Hi guys, I've just updated some projects that now use Maven 2.0.7 along with the Javadoc plugin 2.3, and now my build fails because the UNIX platform where the integrations happen doesn't have bash. The reason is the following: the Javadoc plugin creates a default Commandline object to run the jav

Doubt on dowload sources and javadoc

2007-09-19 Thread José Pacheco
Hello, I’m using maven-eclipse-plugin in a project. The problem is when I make mvn eclipse:eclipse it tries to download the artefacts sources. Even if I add –DdownloadSources=false or delete de mvn-eclipse-cache.properties file it continues trying to download them, sources and javadoc. How can

Re: adding video capture to the continuum site

2007-09-19 Thread Rahul Thakur
How will this affect users on dial-up/slow connections browsing those pages on the continuum site? Is it possible to have these swf (or wnk) resources live outside SVN and be included from an external URL? Rahul - Original Message - From: "olivier lamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EM

Re: [VOTE] release maven-changes-plugin 2.0-beta-3

2007-09-19 Thread Mark Hobson
On 17/09/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess that the presence of > [WARNING] "plexus:plexus-container-default:jar:1.0-alpha-6:compile" > is a bad sign? > > Is the right way to fix this, to excluding this from whichever > dependency is pulling it in? > > I'll try to run 'mvn

Re: Using Maven Artifact in 2.0.x

2007-09-19 Thread Mark Hobson
On 18/09/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it makes sense to release 2.0.8 as is. When Herve comes back > he can roll in his encoding changes. That will fix the biggies for > 2.0.8, there's a couple things I will fix, anything else anyone wants > to tackle and then we can rel

Re: dependency:analyze changes

2007-09-19 Thread Mark Hobson
On 18/09/2007, Paul Gier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that's what I meant ;) > Anyway, the surefire report plugin uses report and report-only to do something > similar, so that seems consistent with Brian's suggestion of using analyze and > analyze-only. Great, I think we're all in agreeme