Thanks John!
comments inline...
On 15/09/2007, at 3:07 AM, John Casey wrote:
1. We should put a piece of repository metadata at the root that
gives the repository id, to help eliminate/reduce the proliferation
of new and creative repository ids.
+1
Understandably, much of this gets us of
Interesting. Are the fields like the "status" some kind of
automatically updated field?
- Brett
On 15/09/2007, at 5:29 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi there,
Just to let you know that I've done a quick implementation (took me
20 minutes) of the Design Dashboard for XWiki's need on http://
w
It looks as though they are hiring, if you are interested in sales:
http://www.tumlare.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=71&Itemid=64
On 9/15/07, Jochen Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2007-09-14 19:10:51 +0200, Julia Antonova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >
> >
> > I will be
Results:
+12 (Jason, Maria, Emmanuel, Lukas, Raphael, Brian, Arnaud, Wendy, Olivier,
Vincent, Brett, Dennis)
This vote has passed.
Please join me in congratulating Hervé!
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 6:44 PM
To: M
Mauro Talevi wrote:
Ok - so two scenarios are possible:
1. Improve wagon abstraction: separate concerns and introduce the
missing features in the appropriate different abstraction layers (ie
upload and download)
2. Remove wagon and implement in maven-artifact, but you'll still end
up fa
Jason van Zyl wrote:
In this case I think the abstraction being neglected hasn't bought us
much. And that a more focused approach on what's most commonly used will
give the real chance to improve the instabilities we have and give
people an easier chance of understanding the codebase without
Sort of related to local repositories, and a thought that came back to me
after reading about separating snapshots and releases - could we do
something about caching the results of transitive dependency resolution? As
fast as XML pull parsing is, it's repeated over and over again for release
depend
On 2007-09-14 19:10:51 +0200, Julia Antonova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I will be out of the office starting 14-09-2007 and will not return until
18-09-2007.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Pls. forward all messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Again. I wish I had as much time off as
