Re: [VOTE] Release archetype 1.0-alpha-5

2007-08-23 Thread Milos Kleint
Has anyone verified that ARCHETYPE-38 really fixed the problem? the current code snippet in MavenArchetypeMojo.java looks like this: /** * @parameter default-value="${user.dir}" */ private String basedir = System.getProperty( "user.dir" ); that still doesn't allow embedded use a

Re: [VOTE] Release archetype 1.0-alpha-5

2007-08-23 Thread Brett Porter
+1 On 24/08/2007, at 8:46 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote: Issues fixed ARCHETYPE-78 Dependencies listed as version ${project.version} in maven-archetype prevent the use of archetypes ARCHETYPE-60Archetype Documentation Incorrect ARCHETYPE-38 The archetype is using user.dir which prohibits

[result] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure

2007-08-23 Thread Brett Porter
Result: 11 affirmative votes from committers, and a +1 from Hervé So, we'll consider it live now. Thanks to those who've volunteered to help ensure it keeps running smoothly, and to those who've been working to fix broken builds. If anyone has any feedback on it's effectiveness (particularl

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

2007-08-23 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (32 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques htt

[VOTE] Release archetype 1.0-alpha-5

2007-08-23 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Issues fixed ARCHETYPE-78 Dependencies listed as version ${project.version} in maven-archetype prevent the use of archetypes ARCHETYPE-60Archetype Documentation Incorrect ARCHETYPE-38The archetype is using user.dir which prohibits clean embedding Change log http://jira.codehaus.org/s

Re: Custom lifecycle and parameters in mojos

2007-08-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I found a solution but for me it's more a workaround that a feature. I created a custom lifecycle AND a forked lifecycle. component.xml : org.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.LifecycleMapping grails-app org.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.DefaultLifecycleMapping

Re: Custom lifecycle and parameters in mojos

2007-08-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
In debug mode I can see that my settings defined in the lifecycle.xml aren't used : [DEBUG] Configuring mojo 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-4:copy-dependencies' --> [DEBUG] (f) excludeTransitive = false [DEBUG] (s) failOnMissingClassifierArtifact = true [DEBUG] (s

Re: Custom lifecycle and parameters in mojos

2007-08-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hey Jason, I had a look at it, and I tried to create a lifecycle.xml descriptor but it doesn't do what I want. In my component.xml I have : org.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.LifecycleMapping grails-app org.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.DefaultLifecycleMapping

Re: Custom lifecycle and parameters in mojos

2007-08-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 23 Aug 07, at 8:46 AM 23 Aug 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Is it possible with a META-INF/maven/lifecycle.xml instead of META-INF/plexus/component.xml. I don't find a documentation about all of this. I need your help. Look at the clover plugin for an example. Thx Arnaud On 23/08/07, Arn

Re: Custom lifecycle and parameters in mojos

2007-08-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Is it possible with a META-INF/maven/lifecycle.xml instead of META-INF/plexus/component.xml. I don't find a documentation about all of this. I need your help. Thx Arnaud On 23/08/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > In a custom lifecycle I would like to use the depend

Re: MNG-2871 - internal dependencies and phases below "package"

2007-08-23 Thread Piotr Tabor
Hi Brian, When did you do that? The current patch tries first to use attached artifact - and when it will fail then links to the orginal project. So the current should work better then the "old" patch... I am likely to agree that this (patching) will cause additional mess and we had better with a)

Re: Release maven-antrun-plugin?

2007-08-23 Thread Dan Tran
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTRUN-68 support ant 1.7 is needed as well will this cause any backward compatibility issue? if not it is an easy fix -D On 8/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/23/07, John Esher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there any committer out

RE: MNG-2871 - internal dependencies and phases below "package"

2007-08-23 Thread Brian E. Fox
Piotr, I did some investigation for a related MDEP issue. I found that in the compile phase, the artifact is resolved with a path to the classes folder. This works for compiling, but obviously doesn't work so well for trying to copy a jar. In the package phase, the artifact is resolved to the jar i

Re: Release maven-antrun-plugin?

2007-08-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/23/07, John Esher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any committer out there who is cracy about releasing this baby? Just glancing at JIRA, I think the questions (binary incompatibility and documentation) on MANTRUN-41 need to be resolved first. Kenney? Carlos? * http://jira.codehaus.

Custom lifecycle and parameters in mojos

2007-08-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Guys, In a custom lifecycle I would like to use the dependency plugin (the copy-dependencies mojo to be exact) but I want to set some of its parameters (outputDirectory, excludedScopes). Can I? How ? -- .. Arnaud HERITIER

Skip lifecycle phases

2007-08-23 Thread Christian Clauss
Hello everyone, I am developing a maven2 plug-in and I'm having a problem. My goal is to end the build process with "Build successful" at the lifecycle phase validate although I'm calling the mvn deploy. Could you please tell me how this is possible? Best Regards Christian

Skip lifecycle phases

2007-08-23 Thread Christian Clauss
Hello everyone, I am developing a maven2 plug-in and I'm having a problem. My goal is to end the build process with "Build successful" at the lifecycle phase validate although I'm calling the mvn deploy. Could you please tell me how this is possible? Best Regards Christian

Re: Release maven-antrun-plugin?

2007-08-23 Thread John Esher
Is there any committer out there who is cracy about releasing this baby? 2007/8/18, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 8/15/07, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am waiting a new release too. > > Any committer can prepare a release and call the vote... are you > interested in volun