Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-29 Thread John Casey
IIRC, path resolution was taking place in the project builder...which would mean that it could have happened during kenney's cleanup of the interpolation. Not sure, though. (I'm fairly certain on the timing of the path translation, though...I'm pretty sure it happened during project-buildin

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-29 Thread John Casey
I've added code in 2.2-beta-2-snap to address this problem...at least, it should address it. I added resolution to the plugin before 2.2-beta-1 because there were issues when people wanted to create an assembly that didn't require dependencies to be resolved, and the dependencies couldn't b

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-29 Thread Brett Porter
Since John's on holidays you probably won't get a full answer for a little bit, but I took a quick dig in the svn logs and would guess: - this was to work around limitations in the artifact resolver (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=438528) - it delegates to the original artifact

Creating a report from the command line?

2007-07-29 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, I have a question regarding MOJO-866. Hopefully, someone can help me. In this bug report, someone is invoking the rat:rat goal from the command line. The plugin fails with a NullPointerException, because getProject() returns null. - Are reports supposed to be working, if you are invoking the

Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
The assembly plugin doesn't seem to obey a hard version that I am specifying in my POM as [1.2-alpha-9]. In addition I have this in the dependencyManagement section of Maven's parent POM and it still ignores it. Right now I cannot get the assembly plugin to use the hard version I am speci

Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of the office.

2007-07-29 Thread Julia Antonova
I will be out of the office starting 18-07-2007 and will not return until 01-08-2007. I will respond to your message when I return. Pls. forward all messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

it0088 broken

2007-07-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'm trying to find the source of the problem, but it0088 is broken on trunk and that's the very nasty ${project.build.directory} not resolving to a full path which caused a tremendous amount of grief between the 2.0. and 2.0.1 releases. I can tell immediately what broke it, but if anyone wa