Both could actually be removed on trunk since they are inherited, I
believe.
- Brett
On 14/07/2007, at 3:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdcasey
Date: Fri Jul 13 10:16:28 2007
New Revision: 556070
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=556070
Log:
Cleanup on aisle 7...fixing
I'll have a closer look at what Forrestdoc is and if/how it could
enhance JXR.
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
2007/7/13, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Could you clarify a bit your intentions, I don't know if I missed that
in the discussion so far.
For the log and AFAIK, here is a brief his
Hi Brett,
2007/7/13, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 13/07/2007, at 8:37 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI, the Forrest Team started a discussion about the future of
> Forrestdoc:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Proposal--decide-the-future-of-forrestdoc-
> tf4060050.html
>
> A key concern
Hi,
2007/7/13, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Could you clarify a bit your intentions, I don't know if I missed that
in the discussion so far.
For the log and AFAIK, here is a brief history of the Maven JXR project.
o The orignal JXR code was merged in 2004 with the Javasrc project
from th
[John Casey wrote:]
> Just curious, but have you seen the eclipse:m2eclipse mojo in the new
> eclipse plugin (it might still be in snapshots, I'm not entirely
> sure)?
Yup, I totally missed that. Didn't realize it existed already.
> I added an eclipse:m2eclipse mojo that I've been using for
yeah, that'd probably do it. It seems like I had a similar problem
once in the assembly plugin, and wound up excluding the component-api
dependency from the plexus-container-default artifact. It may need to
be declared as provided...not sure. Anyhow, I was having trouble with
the Contextual
On 04/07/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 21/06/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/06/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IT doesn't quite sound right - I would have expected it still select
> > nearest and apply the alternate scope from my recollection. B
Just curious, but have you seen the eclipse:m2eclipse mojo in the new
eclipse plugin (it might still be in snapshots, I'm not entirely
sure)? I added an eclipse:m2eclipse mojo that I've been using for
probably 6 months now, without much trouble...you might see if that
fits your needs, and I
On 13/07/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I you implement LogEnabled or extend AbstractLogEnabled (I prefer the
former), plexus will populate the logger when it initializes the
component, prior to use.
This is what I would have expected - I did try this initially but the
logger ended u
I you implement LogEnabled or extend AbstractLogEnabled (I prefer the
former), plexus will populate the logger when it initializes the
component, prior to use.
HTH,
-john
On Jul 13, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi,
I want to add some debug logging to the dependency tree shared
c
Hi,
I want to add some debug logging to the dependency tree shared
component which is used in the dependency:tree goal. Is the preferred
way for the component to extend LogEnabled, and if so, is there any
way of getting the log set automatically by plexus? The alternative
would be for the mojo
Vote for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3102
Done ! Thanks.
It would be nice to increase the priority at major...
Rémy
We must release plexus-contextualizer and plexus-utils-1.4.3 first. Volunteers?
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
All 1.1-beta-1 issues are closed.
I'll prepare the release in next hours or next week.
Emmanuel
Yop, it's OK now.
Thx guys!
:-)
Fabrice.
On 7/12/07, Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
>
>> Today, I've tried several times to commit code in the
>> maven-assembly-plugin,
>> and I always get the same message:
>>
>>
---
Hi,
All 1.1-beta-1 issues are closed.
I'll prepare the release in next hours or next week.
Emmanuel
Could you clarify a bit your intentions, I don't know if I missed that
in the discussion so far.
If we accept the code, is it going to stay a separate project or will it
be merged with jxr? Are they going to compete or supplement each other?
What is the concrete advantage for the Maven project
Vote for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3102
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13/07/2007, at 8:37 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
FYI, the Forrest Team started a discussion about the future of
Forrestdoc:
http://www.nabble.com/-Proposal--decide-the-future-of-forrestdoc-
tf4060050.html
A key concern is to know if the Maven community would like to accept
the code.
+1, though perhaps finishing the Taxonomy pages first might be a plan
as I am sure an alpha of 2.1 will draw in new faces?
Andy
On 11 Jul 2007, at 16:15, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
We've been trying for quite a long time to get into a mode of
faster, more incremental releases. However
Hi,
FYI, the Forrest Team started a discussion about the future of Forrestdoc:
http://www.nabble.com/-Proposal--decide-the-future-of-forrestdoc-tf4060050.html
A key concern is to know if the Maven community would like to accept
the code. WDYT?
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/6/6, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL
Hi,
I'm sure I answered this question (or someone else asking it) on dev@
the other day... I also would really prefer you ask on the users list
so there's a permanent record (even if you need to privately ping me
to take a look there).
Sorry I checked the dev list archive before contacting you
As we can see, the skip feature is very useful and the demand is high.
Some plugins like DbUnit, Hibernate3, SQL, PMD have implemented this
feature.
For some others, a jira is created : checkstyle (
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-43),
antrun (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTRUN-65
22 matches
Mail list logo
