Thats right but it's normal ;-)
Those classes are genarated and we generate them in 2 packages
(org.apache.maven.model and org.apache.maven.project) to keep a
backward compatibility with m1.0
Arnaud
On 10/07/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just an FYI, the classes in the Maven 1
Just an FYI, the classes in the Maven 1.x Model javadocs (Maven website)
are duplicated:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/maven-model/3.0.2/apidocs/index.html
Thanks,
Deng
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 09 July 2007 19:08, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Monday 09 July 2007 14:42, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
> >> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > Yep. That's the #1 issue.I've completely given up on trying to
> > get the string "${pom.version}" outputted into the file.
>
> Ok,
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:42, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
After battling with the braindead resource filtering once again for
the ump-teenth time, I've decided I need to do something about
it
You dissin' my code huh? :)
The main thing I'd like to do is
+1
Arnaud
On 09/07/07, Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 9 Jul 2007, at 00:37, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> There have been tons of enhancements to the plugin testing harness
> since
> the last release in April. Several plugins require the new version
> before release.
>
>
>
> Tag:
>
+1
Arnaud
On 09/07/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 7/9/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> -john
>
>
> On Jul 4, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> > This component is used in the project-info-reports plugin (and is a
> > prereq to its next release) a
+1
Arnaud
On 09/07/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 7/7/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been about 5 months since an eclipse plugin release and we have
> lots of fixes and a handful of enhancements. The issues detected in the
> last vote (MECLIPSE-295) hav
+1
Arnaud
On 09/07/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fixed in the java classes, the pom missing license is due to the
release plugin changes
On 7/9/07, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Review license header (pom or Maven2OsgiConverter) before the release.
>
> Chee
+1
Arnaud
On 09/07/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Mark
On 09/07/07, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
> (great work in catching the pom:test bug, I got that problem in the
> past without being able to trace it down)
>
> fabrizio
>
> On 7/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EM
+1
Mark
On 09/07/07, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
(great work in catching the pom:test bug, I got that problem in the
past without being able to trace it down)
fabrizio
On 7/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone else? This is required by the eclipse release
+1
(great work in catching the pom:test bug, I got that problem in the
past without being able to trace it down)
fabrizio
On 7/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone else? This is required by the eclipse release.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf
Anyone else? This is required by the eclipse release.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Carlos Sanchez
Sent: Sat 7/7/2007 5:05 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-plugin-testing-tools
+1
On 7/6/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:42, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > After battling with the braindead resource filtering once again for
> > the ump-teenth time, I've decided I need to do something about
> > it
>
> You dissin' my code huh? :)
>
> > The main thing I'd like to do is all
Daniel Kulp wrote:
After battling with the braindead resource filtering once again for the
ump-teenth time, I've decided I need to do something about it
You dissin' my code huh? :)
The main thing I'd like to do is allow use of a better filter engine
(like velocity) that would provid
On Monday 09 July 2007 04:37, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I'm not overly familiar with that side of the release plugin, so if
> someone else fancies reviewing the changes. Does this affect
> MRELEASE-83 at all? Since that's the only unresolved issue scheduled
> for 2.0-beta-7.
Nope. Do
fixed in the java classes, the pom missing license is due to the
release plugin changes
On 7/9/07, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Review license header (pom or Maven2OsgiConverter) before the release.
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/7/9, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> anyone else?
+1
Review license header (pom or Maven2OsgiConverter) before the release.
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/7/9, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
anyone else?
On 7/6/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 6 Jul 07, at 4:27 PM 6 Jul 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
> > maven-osgi is a shar
anyone else?
On 7/6/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 6 Jul 07, at 4:27 PM 6 Jul 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> maven-osgi is a shared library for maven to osgi and viceversa common
> code, like version conversion. It's used by the felix bundle plugin
> and the eclipse plugin.
>
+1
On 7/7/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's been about 5 months since an eclipse plugin release and we have
lots of fixes and a handful of enhancements. The issues detected in the
last vote (MECLIPSE-295) have been fixed in the currently staged
plugin-testing-tools 1.0-alpha-2. As
<>
Just so you know, VMware Server is free. I have used it to set up
testing environments, seems to work pretty well.
http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html
--
Daniel Siegmann
FJA-US, Inc.
512 Seventh Ave., New York, NY 10018
(212) 840-2618 ext. 139
---
+1
On 7/9/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
-john
On Jul 4, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> This component is used in the project-info-reports plugin (and is a
> prereq to its next release) and analyses JAR files for Maven
> information and general Java class information.
+1
-john
On Jul 4, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
This component is used in the project-info-reports plugin (and is a
prereq to its next release) and analyses JAR files for Maven
information and general Java class information.
Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tag
I'll update asap and give it another shot.
Thanks!
-john
On Jul 6, 2007, at 8:39 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 06/07/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
t looks like this has broken the trunk build. I get compiler
errors now:
[java] /Users/jdcasey/workspace/maven/components/maven
Yes, the idea was to provide the materials necessary for the code
grant (since it's coming over from codehaus). I'm not an ASF member,
so (according to the IP pages) all I can do is get the materials
together for someone else to submit.
Once we've cleared any IP hurdles, I'll clean those ou
+1
On 9 Jul 2007, at 00:37, Brian E. Fox wrote:
There have been tons of enhancements to the plugin testing harness
since
the last release in April. Several plugins require the new version
before release.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/maven-plugin-
testing-
harn
+1
- Joakim
John Casey wrote:
Hi all,
Jesse and I have been working on a patch plugin that I migrated over
from mojo.codehaus.org into the ASF sandbox, and we feel it's ready
for a release. I've prepared the documentation for a code grant on
this project, and all the appropriate information
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
This component is used in the project-info-reports plugin (and is a
prereq to its next release) and analyses JAR files for Maven
information and general Java class information.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/tags/maven-shared-jar-1.0
Staging Repo:
+1
Vincent
2007/7/8, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Last release vote this weekend, I promise ;-)
The rule api is used by the plugin and is included with this vote. The
only change was to the pom to remove an unnecessary dependency.
This release contains a few small fixes and several n
+1
I guess that maven-patch-plugin.originals.* will be removed from the trunk.
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/7/6, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
Jesse and I have been working on a patch plugin that I migrated over
from mojo.codehaus.org into the ASF sandbox, and we feel it's ready
for a rele
+1
Needs to review/remove TODO in the code and specify default value in
the javadoc (MNG-3098)
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/7/8, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There have been tons of enhancements to the plugin testing harness since
the last release in April. Several plugins require the new versio
+1
Vincent
2007/7/8, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 5:18 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven Shared JAR component 1.0
This component is used in the project-info-
2.4 is really more mature than previous versions. It has been quite a time
since 2.3
Definitly a +1 here (though just a user one).
Denis.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : Monday, July 09, 2007 10:45 AM
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet :
OK, I will work on this, then.
Cheers
Fabrice
On 7/6/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That sounds like a fine idea to me. I commented on the issue, too, fwiw.
Thanks,
-john
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
> I got this problem while trying to make an assembly
On 09/07/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this is where I got to when I looked into it last week. I'm
cool to fix this for 2.5, so negate my -1 and go for it.
Trunk tests pass on Windows with spaces in path! Thanks for that Brian.
Mark
-
Hi Daniel,
I'm not overly familiar with that side of the release plugin, so if
someone else fancies reviewing the changes. Does this affect
MRELEASE-83 at all? Since that's the only unresolved issue scheduled
for 2.0-beta-7.
Cheers,
Mark
On 07/07/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 08/07/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is in the invoker. When the pom is specified as is in the
case of the plugin tools, the -F command line is used to specify it:
if ( !"pom.xml".equals( pom.getName() ) )
{
logger
36 matches
Mail list logo
