Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4 (CURRENT SUMMARY)

cool, at least someone sees what i see. So this 2.4 release is a nogo. -1 from me. we should reopen MECLIPSE-248 as well right? Thanks On 7/5/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wrote my problems with it in MECLIPSE-248 * the only way to get it work so far is delete the org/ap

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4 (CURRENT SUMMARY)

I wrote my problems with it in MECLIPSE-248 * the only way to get it work so far is delete the org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin folder from the local repo and install the plugin locally * if you install without removing the folder doesn't work * if you remove the folder and let it ge

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4 (CURRENT SUMMARY)

The problem reproducable with maven-scm project even with clean local repo. I happens on all of my known projects ( ie maven-native at mojo ). Note all projects involve reactor mode. Single project seems to be working Can some one confirm? -D On 7/5/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (32 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques htt

Re: staging testing-harness 1.1-snapshot

On 5 Jul 07, at 6:59 PM 5 Jul 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: I'm getting ready to staging enforcer, which needs some artifact classes I recently moved to the harness from maven-dependency-plugin. Does anyone have any objections to me staging and voting on a harness release? Go for it, I think a b

staging testing-harness 1.1-snapshot

I'm getting ready to staging enforcer, which needs some artifact classes I recently moved to the harness from maven-dependency-plugin. Does anyone have any objections to me staging and voting on a harness release? --Brian

Re: Platform farm

On 06/07/2007, at 1:31 AM, Christian Gruber wrote: What's the status of the whole distributed build thing in Continuum? That seemed like quite a good way to get a server farm auto-building. We need a final 1.1 release first. - Brett -

Re: svn commit: r553599 - /maven/sandbox/tags/

Yep, I just did the same thing recently. I think a short vetoable heads up on promotion is enough. - Brett On 06/07/2007, at 4:40 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Thu Jul 5 11:23:14 2007 New Revision: 553599 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=re

Re: svn commit: r553599 - /maven/sandbox/tags/

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Thu Jul 5 11:23:14 2007 New Revision: 553599 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=553599 Log: Creating tags dir, for staged releases ready to graduate once a vote passes. Added: maven/sandbox/tags/ The last time I promoted somethi

Re: Platform farm

What's the status of the whole distributed build thing in Continuum? That seemed like quite a good way to get a server farm auto-building. Christian. On Jul 5, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Hi Brett, I think having the automated builds on many platforms is definitely needed. What

RE: Platform farm

Hi Brett, I think having the automated builds on many platforms is definitely needed. What I was looking for is a way for a developer to jump on a platform to try and debug an issue. It sounds like the Solaris Zone might be what I'm looking for. Where do I find out more about getting access? Than

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4 (CURRENT SUMMARY)

Dan, I saw this on IRC the other day. It was related to some repository entries in the project itself, presumably those repos contained bad metadata but I wasn't able to locate it. Take a look at MECLIPSE-248, I pasted the IRC log url in there. -Original Message- From: Dan Tran [mailto:[EM

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4 (CURRENT SUMMARY)

I got this error with fresh mvn eclipse:eclipse [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. GroupId: org.apache.maven.plugi

Re: Running integration tests

On 5 Jul 07, at 7:40 AM 5 Jul 07, Mark Hobson wrote: On 05/07/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, while separating the base class for reuse I forgot to put that back. For the time being it's still supposed to be there. I've put it back. The intent was the put the abstract class

Re: Running integration tests

On 05/07/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, while separating the base class for reuse I forgot to put that back. For the time being it's still supposed to be there. I've put it back. The intent was the put the abstract class in a separate project so that it could be used by the I

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4 (CURRENT SUMMARY)

There's been a lot of discussion in this thread about the release. Let me summarize for those trying to keep up: Binding: +4 Brian, Arnaud, Vincent, Kenney Non-Binding: +1 Graham There are some transient issues with the test subsystem used by eclipse that cause failures on Solaris. The issues are

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

+1. Tested with eclipse 2.2 and wtp 1.5.x for wars I saw an issue about wtp 2.x support. I just upgraded to eclipse 3.3. We'll plan the support for it in 2.5 (it can be out quicly if we have some help !!). Arnaud On 05/07/07, Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Richard van Nieuwenhoven wrote

Re: Running integration tests

On 5 Jul 07, at 4:19 AM 5 Jul 07, Mark Hobson wrote: Hi there, I'm wondering what the intended way of running the ITs are now. r551806 saw the demise of IntegrationTestSuite which Sorry, while separating the base class for reuse I forgot to put that back. For the time being it's still supp

Re: Running integration tests

On 05/07/2007, at 11:19 PM, Mark Hobson wrote: On 05/07/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't tried it, but I prefer not having suite if it works. Doesn't the surefire plugin (2.2+) list all the failed tests at completion so you know which ones to look into? That means the ord

fixed one issue on javadoc tests...

(mainly for Vincent who was asking) I've fixed the problem with the tests failing on Solaris due to the © entity (still don't understand why, but using © instead works and is equivalent). There is still one failure - testQuotedPath, which is the same failure I get on the Mac (so must be a

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Richard van Nieuwenhoven wrote: > Another question did anyone test the plugin with eclipse 3.3 (with and > without WTP) ? Works fine on ordinary projects. I don't use WTP so I can't test that. Max. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

On Thu, July 5, 2007 3:23 pm, Brian E. Fox wrote: > It's a recurring cycle where we wait and wait and before you know > it, it's 5 months like it is now with good functionality already sitting > there. +1. Release early, release often. Regards, Graham -- -

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

ok, after this release i will make/take time for myself to create a new patch that includes all patches of the 3 companies i know that use patched versions. This time i will make the time to include tests and documentation!!! (maybe release 2.5 is not so far away) Another question did anyone test

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Ritchie, I understand the issue but on the flip side, without tests to ensure the functionality works as expected, we can't verify it. I don't personally use this functionality of the plugin so I can't tell at a glance if it's right or not. As I see it, once we are this close to a release (discussi

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Ritchie, I understand the issue but on the flip side, without tests to ensure the functionality works as expected, we can't verify it. I don't personally use this functionality of the plugin so I can't tell at a glance if it's right or not. As I see it, once we are this close to a release (discussi

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

This issue is related to the tools and not the plugin. So I change my vote to +1 Cheers, Vincent 2007/7/5, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Brian, My mistake: compilation success with maven-test-tools:1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT But tests failed again :( Weird: continuum seems happy. Someone

Re: Running integration tests

On 05/07/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't tried it, but I prefer not having suite if it works. Doesn't the surefire plugin (2.2+) list all the failed tests at completion so you know which ones to look into? That means the order probably isn't important. Yeah, I did notice

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

test are missing correct, but a fix for this ear problem is rather important because ear's won't work with WTP as they are. Ritchie Brian E. Fox wrote: > Same thing with this one, the patch doesn't exist yet along with tests > or doc changes. If we have to respin the release because of the test >

Re: Running integration tests

I haven't tried it, but I prefer not having suite if it works. Doesn't the surefire plugin (2.2+) list all the failed tests at completion so you know which ones to look into? That means the order probably isn't important. - Brett On 05/07/2007, at 9:23 PM, Mark Hobson wrote: On 05/07/07,

Re: Running integration tests

I haven't tried it, but I prefer not having suite if it works. Doesn't the surefire plugin (2.2+) list all the failed tests at completion so you know which ones to look into? That means the order probably isn't important. - Brett On 05/07/2007, at 9:23 PM, Mark Hobson wrote: On 05/07/07,

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

ok, thus the vote continue ? Build problems are solved ? Arnaud On 05/07/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Same thing with this one, the patch doesn't exist yet along with tests or doc changes. If we have to respin the release because of the test problems, then we can grab a few patch

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Same thing with this one, the patch doesn't exist yet along with tests or doc changes. If we have to respin the release because of the test problems, then we can grab a few patches if they are complete, otherwise I say they wait. We've been discussing releasing for several weeks now and need to pul

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

It's why I didn't apply it the last time I reviewed WTP issues, because it cost to me a too long time to add those missing elements... Arnaud On 05/07/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't see any tests or docs included in the patch. If we want to apply something quickly, it need

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

I don't see any tests or docs included in the patch. If we want to apply something quickly, it needs to have all the pieces, otherwise it would have to wait until someone has time to essentially complete the fix. -Original Message- From: Richard van Nieuwenhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Seems to be fine. I wait to see with Brian what we do to see if I can apply it. Thanks for your help Arnaud On 05/07/07, Richard van Nieuwenhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, my patch http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-213 contains a fix for this problem. i have also a better versi

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Hi Brian, My mistake: compilation success with maven-test-tools:1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT But tests failed again :( Weird: continuum seems happy. Someone could try too? Vincent 2007/7/4, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Really? I'm able to build it no problems. What's the error? -Original Mes

Re: Running integration tests

On 05/07/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there, I'm wondering what the intended way of running the ITs are now. r551806 saw the demise of IntegrationTestSuite which Tell a lie, it was r551681. core-integration-tests/pom.xml still references, so mvn test runs no tests. Commenti

Running integration tests

Hi there, I'm wondering what the intended way of running the ITs are now. r551806 saw the demise of IntegrationTestSuite which core-integration-tests/pom.xml still references, so mvn test runs no tests. Commenting t+his out results in running the ITs in random order with verbose output, making i

Running integration tests

Hi there, I'm wondering what the intended way of running the ITs are now. r551806 saw the demise of IntegrationTestSuite which core-integration-tests/pom.xml still references, so mvn test runs no tests. Commenting t+his out results in running the ITs in random order with verbose output, making i

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Hello, my patch http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-213 contains a fix for this problem. i have also a better version that takes it from the ear-plugin configuration because there there is a property *defaultLibBundleDir

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

On 05/07/07, Cabasson Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, I kinda changed the suject of the discussion. The matter here is whether the eclipse-plugin should be able to download "sources AND javadoc" or only (as is the cas right now) "sources, and only javadoc as a fallback if sources are mi

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Brian, what do we do ? We fix it for 2.4 or not ? On 05/07/07, Cabasson Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks relevant to me. In a EAR you indeed expect dependencies to be in the root directory, not under WEB-INF lib. Suggested solution looks sensible. Denis. > -Message d'origine- >

RE: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

Well, I kinda changed the suject of the discussion. The matter here is whether the eclipse-plugin should be able to download "sources AND javadoc" or only (as is the cas right now) "sources, and only javadoc as a fallback if sources are missing". I'd like to get the plugin download and link bot

RE: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

Well, I kinda changed the suject of the discussion. The matter here is whether the eclipse-plugin should be able to download "sources AND javadoc" or only (as is the cas right now) "sources, and only javadoc as a fallback if sources are missing". I'd like to get the plugin download and link bot

Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

On 7/5/07, Cabasson Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Basically, I tend to agree with you Kenney. But I have users who love to use Shift+F2 within eclipse (which opens a browser like window with the view of the javadoc in eclipse), and I don't really see why those users should be denied to use

RE: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

Looks relevant to me. In a EAR you indeed expect dependencies to be in the root directory, not under WEB-INF lib. Suggested solution looks sensible. Denis. > -Message d'origine- > De : Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:55 AM > À : Maven De

Re: [VOTE] maven-eclipse-plugin 2.4

We just received a comment about MECLIPSE-184 (it was in private before). WDYT ? I'm not a ear user... Arnaud On 04/07/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's been about 5 months since an eclipse plugin release and we have lots of fixes and a handful of enhancements: Bug * [MECLIPSE-