Question regarding 2.1 Versioning

2007-06-26 Thread Timothy Reilly
I just read: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Versioning Nice document btw, well thought out. I have a curiosity question...Under: Make version handling pluggable Is this saying I would have to define version schemas using a xsd/schema, or is it saying the versionScheme artifact is a java a

Re: svn commit: r543579 - in /maven/components/trunk/maven-project/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/JdkPrefixProfileActivator.java test/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/Jdk

2007-06-26 Thread Brett Porter
John? On 02/06/2007, at 11:13 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 02/06/2007, at 5:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: REOPENED - issue MNG-1910: Allow jdk 1.4+ as profile requirement http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1910 Is this a mylar syntax or something? - Brett ---

Re: [jira] Closed: (MNG-2577) Allow interpolation of Properties in settings.xml

2007-06-26 Thread Brett Porter
John? On 08/06/2007, at 1:01 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Was this fixed, or won't fix? I couldn't really tell from your statement, and there's no version. On 08/06/2007, at 5:54 AM, John Casey (JIRA) wrote: [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2577? page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syste

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Eric Redmond
Not that this is really the thread for it, but +1 on trying out xwiki! Namely because Vincent is an insider (always nice to have) and I never really liked Confluence much anyway. Eric Not an XWiki Developer ;-) On 6/26/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jason, Sounds very good t

Re: Maven 2.0.6 release badly signed or changed

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 3:09 PM 26 Jun 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: I don't think that it could be problem in the gpg plugin. I copied/adapted its code in the artifact plugin for m1 and it seems to work fine (but we don't have to move artifacts between repos) I'm trying some installs and deploys, and

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Jason, Sounds very good to me. You're right that making things surface is a good thing. It requires more discipline but Maven being so successful and so many people relying on it now makes it a necessity I think to better control its evolution. Now all you need is a good wiki that allo

Re: Maven 2.0.6 release badly signed or changed

2007-06-26 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I don't think that it could be problem in the gpg plugin. I copied/adapted its code in the artifact plugin for m1 and it seems to work fine (but we don't have to move artifacts between repos) Arnaud On 26/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 26 Jun 07, at 2:23 PM 26 Jun 07, Jason

Re: Maven 2.0.6 release badly signed or changed

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 2:23 PM 26 Jun 07, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 26 Jun 07, at 1:27 PM 26 Jun 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote: The checksums and signature don't match the pom http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-530 It's not just that it's all of them. By this I mean POMs. The 2.0.7 Maven parent PO

Re: Maven 2.0.6 release badly signed or changed

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 1:27 PM 26 Jun 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote: The checksums and signature don't match the pom http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-530 It's not just that it's all of them. I checked the staging repository and the production repository and the signature is bad in both places a

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 2:05 PM 26 Jun 07, Patrick Schneider wrote: Ok, so the new features start on trunk but the new feature is a branch of trunk. The point being feature additions don't destabilize the trunk. The series of branches associated with issues also provides a clear path of what happen

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Milos Kleint
The proposal looks generally ok to me. I'll try to follow it when working on Toolchains. I'm sure I'll have questions on the way. more regarding api changes below. On 6/26/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I like this approach, and I think it's just a slightly more detailed version of w

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Patrick Schneider
On 6/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 26 Jun 07, at 1:20 PM 26 Jun 07, Patrick Schneider wrote: > A few things: > > 1. Can I get edit access? My username is 'pschneider'. > Sure. I'll find all the user names and add them to the group. > 2. Are there any thoughts re: how pa

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 1:20 PM 26 Jun 07, Patrick Schneider wrote: A few things: 1. Can I get edit access? My username is 'pschneider'. Sure. I'll find all the user names and add them to the group. 2. Are there any thoughts re: how pages are parented? I noticed that only the 'Toolchains' pro

Appc failing with maven weblogic plugin

2007-06-26 Thread PBS
Hi, I am new to maven 2 and am trying to migrate my maven 1 projects to maven 2. I am trying to use xdoclet maven plugin to generate ejb interfaces and deployment descriptor files. The ejb container used is weblogic. The xdoclet maven plugin seemed to have executed correctly (that's what I think)

Maven 2.0.6 release badly signed or changed

2007-06-26 Thread Carlos Sanchez
The checksums and signature don't match the pom http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-530 -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To u

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Patrick Schneider
A few things: 1. Can I get edit access? My username is 'pschneider'. 2. Are there any thoughts re: how pages are parented? I noticed that only the 'Toolchains' proposal is parented by 'All Proposals'. Most of the rest seem to be under 'Maven 2.1 Design Documents'. It would be nice to see, at

Re: Nag: Upload request (cannot submit via Jira)

2007-06-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 6/26/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: uploaded Thanks! -- "Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in a preventative effect against manipulating elections. The german government justifying the use of electronic voting machines and obviously believ

Re: Nag: Upload request (cannot submit via Jira)

2007-06-26 Thread Carlos Sanchez
uploaded On 6/26/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry for nagging, but I still do have the same issues with Jira. (Trygvis suggested I contact Ben Walding and Bob McWhirter, which I did.) Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for the upload of > >http://peopl

Nag: Upload request (cannot submit via Jira)

2007-06-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Sorry for nagging, but I still do have the same issues with Jira. (Trygvis suggested I contact Ben Walding and Bob McWhirter, which I did.) Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for the upload of > >http://people.apache.org/~jochen/rat-lib-0.5.1-bundle.jar > > I was, of cou

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
More info: I cannot reproduce the problem with another Mojo, which isn't declared as an extension. -- "Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in a preventative effect against manipulating elections. The german government justifying the use of electronic voting machine

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 6/26/07, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you add static { System.out.println( "XXX " + Contextualizable.class + ": " + Contextualizable.class.getClassLoader() ); } to your mojo and see what it prints? Here's the output: XXX interface org.codehaus.plexus.personality.pl

Order of filtering properties

2007-06-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, Interresting by the bug MRESOURCES-39, i wonder the order of the properties when filtering resources. Is it correct (in maven's philosophy) if a property found in a filtered resources take: first the value of the System properties (like -D) if found otherwirse in filter files (set by

Re: .isSnapshot changes version

2007-06-26 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le vendredi 22 juin 2007, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > Le vendredi 22 juin 2007, Kenney Westerhof a écrit : > > * There are multiple methods for version modification/retrieval: > > > > * resolved version (setter only - sets version) > > * version (sets version, baseversion, and versionrange; gets

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 8:49 AM 26 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: On 26/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We can quickly try this little process if you put your proposal on the main proposals page, then we'll put it in the pending section and we can ask people to look at vote. Would probabl

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-26 Thread Mark Hobson
On 26/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We can quickly try this little process if you put your proposal on the main proposals page, then we'll put it in the pending section and we can ask people to look at vote. Would probably be the easiest as you have to field the feedback as a ve

Getting accurate release info

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
Can folks please update the release info here if they are responsible: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Releases I think some of the versions for Continuum and Archiva are not quite correct because I can't find them in central so might want to check those. Thanks, Jason ---

RE: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Rollo, Dan
Looking over the current page, I see one mention of the Embedder. I'm unclear whether there are plans to release any embedder updates in the 2.0.* line. From the "The Embedder for all client use in 2.1", I'm also unsure if the Embedder is to be released in the 2.1 line either. We're currently usin

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 6:46 AM 26 Jun 07, Jesse McConnell wrote: On 6/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 25 Jun 07, at 7:11 PM 25 Jun 07, John Casey wrote: > I like this approach, and I think it's just a slightly more > detailed version > of what some of us are already trying to do

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Jun 07, at 2:40 AM 26 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: On 25/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mark, Can you help me make proposals like this more visible not only to developers who might be interested, but to folks looking in at the project for the first time. I am trying to c

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-26 Thread Jesse McConnell
On 6/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 25 Jun 07, at 7:11 PM 25 Jun 07, John Casey wrote: > I like this approach, and I think it's just a slightly more > detailed version > of what some of us are already trying to do when we put together > major new > pieces for Maven. I agree

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-26 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On 6/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It must be being pulled in by a dep in the mojo. Is this something that I can see? Unfortunately not yet. Shall I file a Jira issue with some sample code? Can you add static { System.out.println( "XXX " + Contex

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-26 Thread Mark Hobson
On 25/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mark, Can you help me make proposals like this more visible not only to developers who might be interested, but to folks looking in at the project for the first time. I am trying to collect all pertinent information to the project here: htt

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-26 Thread Mark Hobson
On 25/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yah, sounds fine to be. It seems non-invasive and the onus is on you so if something goes wrong I know who to look for :-) Okay, I'll work on trying to get it working via extensions a little more then submit another patch for any final comme

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 6/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It must be being pulled in by a dep in the mojo. Is this something that I can see? Unfortunately not yet. Shall I file a Jira issue with some sample code? Thanks, Jochen -- "Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, result