Re: Sequence of events to ramping up Maven 2.1

2007-06-24 Thread Christian Gruber
Apropos to this and to the IT/development expectations, is the Maven 2.1.x process going to have strong infrastructure around build automation? At this point, I think Continuum 1.1-alpha-* builds are probably stable enough to be used for CI, and a secondary "build fresh" nightly build and

Re: Surefire with TestNG?

2007-06-24 Thread Brett Porter
Last update here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven- surefire-dev/200705.mbox/%3CA363606D- [EMAIL PROTECTED] No progress in the last month (I believe Alex has committed some more things to the branch that could be reviewed though). For surefire in general, getting 2.3.1 out was

Re: [vote] Release Maven 1.1 Final

2007-06-24 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
The vote passed (phew !!) with 7 binding votes (Jason, Carlos, Stephane, Brett, Emmanuel, Lukas, and myself) and 1 non-binding (Jeff). I'm preparing the release and I'll announce it tomorrow. Thanks Arnaud On 22/06/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: An emphatic +1 :-) -Origina

Re: Asking for feedback on WAGON-82

2007-06-24 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Jochen, I'll try to have a look at it this week because I also noticed some weeks ago that I wasn't able to deploy on a webdav server (archiva) through a proxy Arnaud On 24/06/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, may I ask that anyone volunteers as an assignee for WAGON-82?

Re: Encoding issues for 2.0.8

2007-06-24 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le samedi 23 juin 2007, Kenney Westerhof a écrit : > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Le samedi 23 juin 2007, Brett Porter a écrit : > >> We shouldn't permit relative entities in the POM - it would cause > >> grief when deployed to the repository. > >> > >> - Brett > > > > ok, then the target API is read(I

Re: Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24 Jun 07, at 11:49 AM 24 Jun 07, mraible wrote: This is great to hear. I've been waiting for the "create-from-project" feature for a long time. Projects like AppFuse Light (which currently has 60 possible combinations of web + persistence framework) will greatly benefit from this. I've

Re: Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24 Jun 07, at 9:58 AM 24 Jun 07, Milos Kleint wrote: Hello, I'm somewhat confused. I'm following Raphael's work closely as the current archetype doens't allow me to create a reasonable archetype(s) for netbeans platform based apps. I've been able to do so with archetypeng seamlessly. Howeve

Re: Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/24/07, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However "creating archetype from any project" sounds a bit over the top to me. The primary goal of archetype is to create projects based on archetypes. That's what should be dead simple. Yes, but where do those archetypes come from? :) Right

Re: Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread mraible
This is great to hear. I've been waiting for the "create-from-project" feature for a long time. Projects like AppFuse Light (which currently has 60 possible combinations of web + persistence framework) will greatly benefit from this. I've been reluctant to create archetypes for each combination

Re: Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi, Let me explain what i think is the typical use case of the creation of a project from an archetype. 1. the user creates a fresh directory 2. the user goes in that directory 3. the user call mvn archetype:create -Dinteractive=true 4. the user is prompted to select the groupId (from a list) of

Re: Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
2007/6/24, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, I'm somewhat confused. I'm following Raphael's work closely as the current archetype doens't allow me to create a reasonable archetype(s) for netbeans platform based apps. I've been able to do so with archetypeng seamlessly. However "creating

Surefire with TestNG?

2007-06-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hey, I added a work-in-progress entry on the dashboard. Wasn't sure what the status was so I listed what I knew but a little status document would help to provide some visibility for those interested. Kenney, Brett, any updates on what's happening? http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/H

Re: Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread Milos Kleint
Hello, I'm somewhat confused. I'm following Raphael's work closely as the current archetype doens't allow me to create a reasonable archetype(s) for netbeans platform based apps. I've been able to do so with archetypeng seamlessly. However "creating archetype from any project" sounds a bit over t

Update on Archteype

2007-06-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I've updated the dashboard with some information on Archetype. We're close to having a seamless solution: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/ArchetypeNG And it's listed under work in progress on the dashboard. Once the criteria of Archetype being dead simple to use it will be on i

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 23 Jun 07, at 10:35 PM 23 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote: On 22/06/2007, at 8:15 PM, Mark Hobson wrote: On 22/06/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's never been an alternative, but it was implemented as "newest wins" in an early alpha. Curse the person who switched to nearest!

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release maven-idea-plugin 2.1

2007-06-24 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Thanks Dennis. Stéphane On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done. Just wait for it to sync. Stephane Nicoll wrote: > Can we stage this on please? > > Stéphane > > On 6/13/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 12 Jun 07, at 2:10 PM 12 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg w