+1
Fabrice
On 6/20/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's been about 5 months since we last released eclipse. There are
plenty of issues already fixed:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13001&styleName
=Html&projectId=11133&Create=Create
There are currently
On 19 Jun 07, at 6:26 PM 19 Jun 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I'd like to see about getting 2.0.x up to a newer container. Not only
would this fix my plexus thousands of warnings issue, but more
importantly it would get some more synergy between 2.0 and 2.1
especially as it relates to various plexus
The Apache Maven team would like to announce the availability of
Maven 2.0.7.
You can find the binaries here:
http://maven.apache.org/download.html
You can find the release notes here:
http://maven.apache.org/release-notes.html
You can find the roadmap here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure
Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, Kenney Westerhof a écrit :
> Also see
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk/maven-surefire-plugin
>/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/SurefirePlugin.java
>
> line 494.
>
> I tried to fix this a while back but it's a big mess and has a lot o
+1
I don't have a lot of projects, so I tested by building the source
distro with the binary one :)
Great job all - I really appreciate the efforts you put in to finish
this.
- Brett
On 21/06/2007, at 3:46 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi team,
It's with pleasure that I want to launch t
On 18/06/2007, at 10:41 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 17 Jun 07, at 5:25 PM 17 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 17/06/2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason van Zyl (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2943?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jason va
IT doesn't quite sound right - I would have expected it still select
nearest and apply the alternate scope from my recollection. But IIRC
behaviour was changed ~2.0.4 in relation to scopes, for some
particular reason and perhaps this is it: Carlos?
Second part sounds like a simple oversight
+1
On 20 Jun 07, at 1:01 PM 20 Jun 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's been about 5 months since we last released eclipse. There are
plenty of issues already fixed:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
version=13001&styleName
=Html&projectId=11133&Create=Create
There are currently 2
It is in my todo list but up until now I focused on maven 1.
I have several co-workers who reported to me that they are unable to run
tests in this plugin.
I'll study this problem with them tomorrow.
I have also some patchs to apply concerning rad6 and myeclipse but it can be
included in the next
It's also worth considering contributing it to installjammer itself.
On 20/06/2007, at 11:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 20 Jun 07, at 6:37 AM 20 Jun 07, Donovan, Aaron wrote:
I'd like to contribute a plug-in that wraps installjammer,
www.installjammer.com. We use it to create GUI installer
go for it
On 6/20/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's been about 5 months since we last released eclipse. There are
plenty of issues already fixed:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13001&styleName
=Html&projectId=11133&Create=Create
There are currently 24
It's been about 5 months since we last released eclipse. There are
plenty of issues already fixed:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13001&styleName
=Html&projectId=11133&Create=Create
There are currently 24 remaining open. Any objections to cutting a
release as is and b
On 20 Jun 07, at 11:47 AM 20 Jun 07, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 20 Jun 07, at 10:13 AM 20 Jun 07, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Be sure that this doesn't break forward compatibility too.
That approach would not allow for proper mirroring,
authentication propagation, network pr
+1 Good job!
Stéphane
On 6/20/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi team,
It's with pleasure that I want to launch the vote to release the final
version of maven 1.1.
We published, one month ago, a first release candidate for maven 1.1 and
we had few issues opened (certainly b
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 20 Jun 07, at 10:13 AM 20 Jun 07, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Be sure that this doesn't break forward compatibility too.
That approach would not allow for proper mirroring, authentication
propagation, network proxy usage, and short-circuits the whole wagon
manager approach
+1: Jason, Brett, Stephane, Joakim, Arnaud, Jesse, Brian (non-
binding: Eric, Jo, Jochen, Christian)
+0: nada
-1: nada
I'll push this out as soon as I can today.
Jason.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
On 20 Jun 07, at 10:13 AM 20 Jun 07, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Be sure that this doesn't break forward compatibility too.
That approach would not allow for proper mirroring, authentication
propagation, network proxy usage, and short-circuits the whole
wagon manager approach of wagon 2.x
Wh
+1
On 6/20/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi team,
It's with pleasure that I want to launch the vote to release the final
version of maven 1.1.
We published, one month ago, a first release candidate for maven 1.1 and
we had few issues opened (certainly because this release
+1
Woo hoo!
On 20 Jun 07, at 10:46 AM 20 Jun 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi team,
It's with pleasure that I want to launch the vote to release the
final
version of maven 1.1.
We published, one month ago, a first release candidate for maven
1.1 and
we had few issues opened (certainly be
Hi team,
It's with pleasure that I want to launch the vote to release the final
version of maven 1.1.
We published, one month ago, a first release candidate for maven 1.1 and
we had few issues opened (certainly because this release is perfect, and not
because we lost our last users ;-) ).
Sin
Be sure that this doesn't break forward compatibility too.
That approach would not allow for proper mirroring, authentication
propagation, network proxy usage, and short-circuits the whole wagon
manager approach of wagon 2.x
Direct usage of the wagon, not through the wagon manager, means a lo
Can you change the logger to detect this and not re-report? This will
make -X output obscenely long (as if it wasn't already :)
- Brett
On 20/06/2007, at 2:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markh
Date: Tue Jun 19 09:53:10 2007
New Revision: 548797
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?vie
On 20/06/2007, at 3:27 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
+1
How can I not vote +1? After all, according to the META-INF/
MANIFEST.MF in the maven-core-2.0.7-uber.jar I built it.
Niggle: It still feels wrong to have the maven-core-2.0.7-uber.jar
have a LICENSE.txt in it's root that says it's a GP
Hi there,
I've having problems with DefaultArtifactCollector events when scopes
are being updated. The scenario in question is as follows:
p -> a
a -> c:test, b
b -> c:compile
This resolves as follows:
1) c:test's scope is broadened to compile
2) p -> a -> c:test is disabled in prefe
On 20 Jun 07, at 6:37 AM 20 Jun 07, Donovan, Aaron wrote:
I'd like to contribute a plug-in that wraps installjammer,
www.installjammer.com. We use it to create GUI installers as part of
the build process. Should I just submit a Jira issue and attach the
code? I'm sure that this has been aske
I'd like to contribute a plug-in that wraps installjammer,
www.installjammer.com. We use it to create GUI installers as part of
the build process. Should I just submit a Jira issue and attach the
code? I'm sure that this has been asked many times before, but I didn't
see any way to search the ma
Thanks for the summary mail, Mark. I agree that's the general plan. A
couple of comments...
On 20/06/2007, at 2:48 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
other than that let's just choose one of the libraries and deprecate
the other one to avoid splitting the work
archiva-dependency-graph appears to be qu
I agree.
I likewise share concerns about the performance of this. My
preference would be for the policy to be better separated, but still
applied during the resolution process. In my mind this had always
been the place for 'conflict resolvers' to enforce policy during the
process.
Howev
Also see
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk/maven-surefire-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/SurefirePlugin.java
line 494.
I tried to fix this a while back but it's a big mess and has a lot of unwanted
side effects.
Accessors shouldn't change a property,
Hi Joakim,
On 19/06/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to see maven 2.1 fixed in regards to project model resolution.
The current mess in maven/components is completely unusable within
archiva. If that occurs, then the rest of the dependency graph
resolution bits will fall int
On 19/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you do "mvn install" in the parent IT directory all the plugins
and artifacts required will be installed and the ITs will pass.
I'm sure we're crossing wires here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] core-integration-testing]$ mvn install
...
[EMAIL PROTE
Will http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2305 (not able to access HTTPS
repositories via proxy/firewall) be resolved?
Cheers
Franz
Jason van Zyl schrieb:
Just a reminder for anyone lurking who wants issues addressed in 2.0.8
to vote for issues in JIRA.
Thanks,
Jason
-
32 matches
Mail list logo
