Re: Archetype review

2007-05-20 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Quick answer, will answer in depth after work. Raphaël 2007/5/21, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is mostly for Raphaël, but also anyone else interested in Archetype dev. So, as I understand it: - maven-archetype-1.0.x branch is no longer needed (this was for the alpha series releases

Re: mvn repository:bundle-pack

2007-05-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 14/05/2007, at 11:40 PM, Kevin Conaway wrote: Hi All, I have a question about the maven repository plugin. On the project website, there is a goal called "bundle-pack" which should create a repository bundle for projects that don't use maven. However, it appears that this goal is not includ

Re: Artifact resolution bugs and unfortunate jar-plugin/assembly-plugin interactions.

2007-05-20 Thread Brett Porter
Seems like a good idea to capture this as a 2.1 feature request, write it up in the wiki and link in any related JIRA issues from all the plugins and MNG itself so that it has a focal point. As we work through things like the artifact mechanism it can be taken into consideration. That's i

Re: Archtypeng - summary of features

2007-05-20 Thread Brett Porter
I think the key thing is to focus on a stable code base that can be released as more functional than the last. With the addition of create-from-project, I'm more than happy with the feature-set of archetype and we should focus on a 1.0 that is properly documented, API stable, and all those

Archetype review

2007-05-20 Thread Brett Porter
This is mostly for Raphaël, but also anyone else interested in Archetype dev. So, as I understand it: - maven-archetype-1.0.x branch is no longer needed (this was for the alpha series releases before the re-arrangement / refactoring that only got half done last year). I've removed it. - tr

Re: Maven Grafo plugin - proposed design

2007-05-20 Thread Peter Kolbus
Carlos Sanchez wrote: > I think you are going too far for the start, is good to have the use > cases and the overall idea, but as soon as you get to the > implementation you will find things that you didn't thought about > before. > Certainly - there will be minor tweaks and changes. I'm not doi

Re: svn commit: r539873 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-test-tools/pom.xml

2007-05-20 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi, Samething: bump to 1.4.2 Cheers, Vincent 2007/5/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Author: baerrach Date: Sun May 20 05:12:20 2007 New Revision: 539873 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539873 Log: [MNG-2996] Upgrade to plexus-utils:1.4.2-SNAPSHOT Modified: mave

Re: Beginnings of "Hacking Archiva" document.

2007-05-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/20/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just committed an initial xdoc for the "Hacking Archiva" set of documents. ... Since I'm so close to the code, I have my own (obviously skewed) view of what's important and what's not. I could use the opinions of other developers here

Re: svn commit: r539869 - in /maven/shared/trunk/maven-invoker: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/maven/shared/invoker/ src/test/java/org/apache/maven/shared/invoker/

2007-05-20 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi, Since plexus-utils:1.4.2 is out, bump to it instead of snapshot. Cheers, Vincent 2007/5/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Author: baerrach Date: Sun May 20 05:00:32 2007 New Revision: 539869 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539869 Log: [MINVOKER-3] Applied patch (m

Re: Specifying IntelliJ module name with maven-idea-plugin

2007-05-20 Thread Ronn . Chinowutthichai
Hi Dennis, One of the reason I don't prefer your approach (which I had adopted before) is that when all of the the artifact is released into the repository, it's structure does not match up with the actual SVN directory structure. It's harder to derived where that artifact comes from without l

Re: Problem with site plugin and custom language mojos

2007-05-20 Thread Jason Dillon
Does anyone haven any ideas on how to fix this? My guess is that the custom life-cycle that the site bits are forking is somehow not picking up the extra dependencies which need to be configured on the maven-plugin-plugin... and which are configured for normal builds, but freak out when generatin

Re: Maven Grafo plugin - proposed design

2007-05-20 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I think you are going too far for the start, is good to have the use cases and the overall idea, but as soon as you get to the implementation you will find things that you didn't thought about before. About the UI as long as you have the global idea of how it should work then when you start with