RE: Dep to same artifact in different versions

Arik Kfir wrote on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:15 PM: > Doesn't the jmock2 contains the classes of jmock1 as well? No. They should be used side-by-side. And this is a general problem. No project will change their domain/packages and adjust artifact names, simply because Maven cannot handle the

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads

Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (32 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MAVENUPLOAD-1502JPF - Java Plugin Framework http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1502 MAVENUPLOAD-1497Upload Unitils 1.0 rc 2 http://jira.

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism

Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (40 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MEV-513 Invalid POM: aspectwerkz/aspectwerkz-core http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-513 MEV-511 org.apache.struts:struts2-tiles-plugin:2.0.6 con

Re: ApacheCon EU

Hi Brett, I've got it arranged to get a co-worker of mine to go to your training, with the goal of hearing things from you instead of me ;) List of my things : - Give an overview of what's going on the Netherlands atm in relation to Maven2. - Discussion on the *current* state of things (not in d

Re: JavaOne

Well, I am available just about any time, so I shan't put my free times on the calendar, it will just take up space :) Andy On 25 Apr 2007, at 19:10, Jason van Zyl wrote: Cool, John setup a calendar and if we all put available times there then I can propose some meeting times. With a litt

Re: JavaOne

Cool, John setup a calendar and if we all put available times there then I can propose some meeting times. With a little notice there is no problem getting space at the Terracotta offices. They have a big conference room with whiteboards we can use and they are fine with giving us the roo

Re: JavaOne

I'll be at J1 too On 4/25/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, We can certainly continue any discussions from ApacheCon at JavaOne and I have chatted with the folks at Terracotta and they would be happy to put us up for a couple days in one of their conference rooms where we can wor

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

Hi Jason, Thanks for the reply. I was following the MNG-1577 debate and agree that this is certainly a step in the right direction. The dependency management solution is suitable for smaller projects with a manageable set of transitive dependencies, although it starts to grow unwieldy with larg

[ANN] Maven Model 3.0.2 for Maven 1.x released

We are pleased to announce the Maven Model 3.0.2 release! In this new version, the pom v 3 can be read/write with xpp3, dom4j and stax. In maven 1.1 RC1 we now use the stax reader/writer which supports xml entities to reintroduce the compa

Re: Dep to same artifact in different versions

Doesn't the jmock2 contains the classes of jmock1 as well? On 4/25/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:26 PM: > On 25 Apr 07, at 9:00 AM 25 Apr 07, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:41 PM: >>

RE: Dep to same artifact in different versions

Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:26 PM: > On 25 Apr 07, at 9:00 AM 25 Apr 07, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:41 PM: >> >>> On 25 Apr 07, at 8:09 AM 25 Apr 07, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> Hi devs, how will Maven handle

Re: ApacheCon EU

On 25 Apr 07, at 9:11 AM 25 Apr 07, Steven Rowe wrote: I'm trying to sort out a way to go from OO to Wiki as I can't work anymore with OO. That's OmniOutliner not OpenOffice (which is a terrible piece of software). Which is terrible? OpenOffice or OmniOutliner? And if OpenOffice, why?

Re: Dep to same artifact in different versions

On 25 Apr 07, at 9:00 AM 25 Apr 07, Jörg Schaible wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:41 PM: On 25 Apr 07, at 8:09 AM 25 Apr 07, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi devs, how will Maven handle the problem of a dependency that should be used in two different versions? This applies

Re: ApacheCon EU

> I'm trying to sort out a way to go from OO to Wiki as I can't work > anymore with OO. That's OmniOutliner not OpenOffice (which is a terrible > piece of software). Which is terrible? OpenOffice or OmniOutliner? And if OpenOffice, why? - Steve -

RE: Dep to same artifact in different versions

Jason van Zyl wrote on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:41 PM: > On 25 Apr 07, at 8:09 AM 25 Apr 07, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> how will Maven handle the problem of a dependency that should be >> used in two different versions? This applies to all project that >> release a new (normally

JavaOne

Hi, We can certainly continue any discussions from ApacheCon at JavaOne and I have chatted with the folks at Terracotta and they would be happy to put us up for a couple days in one of their conference rooms where we can work and hold a BOF if we so choose. We can also have a conference r

Re: Dep to same artifact in different versions

On 25 Apr 07, at 8:09 AM 25 Apr 07, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi devs, how will Maven handle the problem of a dependency that should be used in two different versions? This applies to all project that release a new (normally major) version that can be used with the old version at the same tim

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

On 23 Apr 07, at 1:01 PM 23 Apr 07, Mark Hobson wrote: Hi there, I've had an initial stab at implementing ConflictResolvers and attached a patch to MNG-612. If people wouldn't mind taking a peek, I'd appreciate some feedback on the following: Not sure if you noticed the MNG-1577 debate, bu

Re: ApacheCon EU

On 24 Apr 07, at 7:42 PM 24 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I saw that Dennis, Jason, Kenney, Eric, Martin, Robert, and Arnaud B will all be at AC EU next week - is anyone else attending ApacheCon? Eric and Kenney won't be joining us, but they will be at JavaOne. The Sonatype will be c

Re: [M1][vote] release plugins : idea 1.7, jalopy 1.5.1, jar 1.8.1, javadoc 1.9, multichanges 1.3, plugin 1.7.1

+1 Stéphane On 4/24/07, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Here is a new list of plugins to release for maven 1.x. > > -- > IDEA 1.7 > -- > Changes in this version include : > > New Features: > o Autodetect which version control syste

Dep to same artifact in different versions

Hi devs, how will Maven handle the problem of a dependency that should be used in two different versions? This applies to all project that release a new (normally major) version that can be used with the old version at the same time. This is currently possible at least with: jmock 1.x / jmock

Re: [vote] release maven-source-plugin 2.0.3

Result of the vote: +1 Binding: Brian, Vincent S., Jesse, Stéphane +1 Non Binding: Jochen Wiedmann, Daniel Kulp, Niall Pemberton I'll proceed with the release. Thanks, Stéphane On 4/21/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd like to release the maven-source-plugin 2.0.3 The s

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

On 25/04/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Cool, I'll take a look - since there seems to be a lot of talk about maven-artifact right now, maybe this could be added to a list of things to discuss while folks are f2f for the upcoming conferences. I'll send a separate mail. Thanks Brett.

Re: ApacheCon EU

Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > Hello, > > Any other thoughts? Interest from the folks attending in anything in > particular? > I am far from being a regular contributor to maven, for lack of time and lack of the "big picture" (hence lack of time to construct it myself from co

Re: [Archetype] branching question

2007/4/25, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, I don't quite understand this? Are you saying it's just incompatible with what's in there already, or this now diverges from compatibility with the current version? Nope I had incompatibility between my first descriptor proposition and my secon

Re: Archetypes - Question about languages and file extensions

2007/4/25, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 24/04/2007, at 9:29 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: > > My questions are: > - apart from java, groovy, aspectj, csharp, what are the common > directory names where files with packaging ability are located? Wouldn't this be anything under main/ or test