Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 4/10/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As I understand it, this one has been in a grey area for some time. Firstly, to be clear, there's nothing legally wrong with what it's doing - this is purely protecting users from getting code that is not AL unsuspectingly. Since the use of ch

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 4/10/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm no lawyer, but I was under the impression that with Java muck, > that importing and referencing [L]GPL classes in non-[L]GPL code was > not legit. Or is that just for GPL? just GPL A

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Ralph Goers
Actually, that depends on who you ask. If you read the FSF site you'd get the impression it is not. JBoss says it is. What is most important is that according to what I've seen on Apache legal-discuss the project can't have direct dependencies on LGPL'd software. It would make a lot of sense

Let's release Archiva

2007-04-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
I took a look at archiva/trunk, and the only remaining snapshot dependencies I see are from maven-app-configuration. That vote has passed and is just waiting for the staged binaries to be copied over to the synced repo. Once that's done, I'd like to tag and release archiva/trunk. It works, it a

Re: [vote] maven-app-configuration and maven-shared-component parent release

2007-04-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/30/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: passed with 6 binding (jmcconnell, bporter, oching, evenisse, jdcasey, and jerdfelt) I'll copy these out and get the continuum alpha 1 release prepared for a vote Jesse, any news on this? Looks like maven-app-configuration 1.0 would also

RE: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
The use of Maven with Checkstyle is prominently listed on their site. Has anyone in the past discussed the license with them? (ie changing it to Apache friendly?) -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 6:47 PM To: Maven Developers List

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm no lawyer, but I was under the impression that with Java muck, that importing and referencing [L]GPL classes in non-[L]GPL code was not legit. Or is that just for GPL? just GPL -

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jason Dillon
On Apr 9, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote: As I understand it, this one has been in a grey area for some time. Firstly, to be clear, there's nothing legally wrong with what it's doing - this is purely protecting users from getting code that is not AL unsuspectingly. Since the use of

Re: dependency on system library (java.library.path)

2007-04-09 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Hi Hello Mark, > > the freehep-nar-plugin does exactly what you describe. > > http://java.freehep.org/freehep-nar-plugin Thanks for the hint. This sounds promising. Anyways I am not creating system libraries, I just want to use them in my project.

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Brett Porter
As I understand it, this one has been in a grey area for some time. Firstly, to be clear, there's nothing legally wrong with what it's doing - this is purely protecting users from getting code that is not AL unsuspectingly. Since the use of checkstyle is optional, and because we don't 'di

RE: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
In a pom I agree, but from the CLI you can run checkstyle:check. -Original Message- From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:36 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL On Apr 9, 20

Re: [CONF] Apache Geronimo Knowledge Base: How do I setup my SVN client for commits? (page created)

2007-04-09 Thread Jason Dillon
This is not a complete list of auto-props... it complexly missies keywords and mime-types. I don't recommend that anyone use this file as-is for their subversion/config. --jason On Apr 9, 2007, at 9:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Page Created : GMOxKB : How do I setup my SVN client for

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jason Dillon
On Apr 9, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Jerome Lacoste wrote: On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I personally have no love for GPL/LGPL, why such hate ? :) I didn't say hate :-P I just don't have a love for it... most because its not friggen compatible with the ASL :-P I wish it was

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jason Dillon
On Apr 9, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: whole plugin will cause total havoc on existing builds. (As would purging old versions of it) It's the "optional" part that is important. Nothing from Apache should silently pull in LGPL dependencies. Moving the plugin to Codehaus is probably

RE: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yes, but currently relocations are ignored for plugins. I tried to do that before and had no luck. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Sanchez Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 12:13 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Checkstyle, mave

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Carlos Sanchez
if we release a new version under mojo and put a relocation for that one in apache, won't that warn all users that just try to upgrade? On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In order for this to work, I think maven needs to support relocations of plugins. This currently doesn't work

Re: [VOTE] Release Clover plugin v2.4

2007-04-09 Thread Gregory Kick
Whatever happened with this? On 3/26/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 25 March 2007 13:30, Vincent Massol wrote: > I've tried to write several different integration tests to test this > but it's always working... > > There are a lot of issues with the Clover plugin but that's

RE: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
In order for this to work, I think maven needs to support relocations of plugins. This currently doesn't work. Does this mean ALL versions of checkstyle, including those already released must move? That's the part that will be most disruptive. -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailt

RE: Handling versions for our skins

2007-04-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
>What do you think about this? +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At the end of the link quoted below: > a bridging api (which can reside within the same project - so can be hosted at apache) >will be used to access these LGPL stuff to clearly show its optional behaviour This is probably the simplest thin

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At the end of the link quoted below: > a bridging api (which can reside within the same project - so can be hosted at apache) >will be used to access these LGPL stuff to clearly show its optional behaviour This is probably the simplest thin

Handling versions for our skins

2007-04-09 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi I'm preparing to release a new version of maven-stylus-skin. I'd therefor like your opinions on how we should handle versions for our skins. The only real change in maven-stylus-skin is the addition of a couple of missing images. The current version is 1.1-SNAPSHOT. I'd like to make it a

Re: Doxia Site rendering broken

2007-04-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 9 Apr 07, at 8:47 AM 9 Apr 07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, I am probably in a minority, but a patch like the one in "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=519557"; scares the hell out of me. Not only is this a major, undocumented change to the behaviour of the Doxia render

[RESULT][VOTE] Release maven-skins pom 3

2007-04-09 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here are the results of this vote: +1 Binding: Dennis Lundberg, Brian Fox, Jason val Zyl, Emmanuel Venisse, John Casey +1 Non-binding: Maria Odea Ching, Andrew Williams I will proceed with this release manually. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, I'd like to release maven-skins pom 3. This is in

Doxia Site rendering broken

2007-04-09 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Hi, I am probably in a minority, but a patch like the one in "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=519557"; scares the hell out of me. Not only is this a major, undocumented change to the behaviour of the Doxia renderer, it also breaks a number of apt and xdoc pages that rendered fine be

Re: MSITE-138: showstopper still without solution?

2007-04-09 Thread Dennis Lundberg
No, not until yesterday. I didn't have time to do the release directly after the vote had passed, but it's out now. Brian E. Fox wrote: Didn't we just do a JXR release? -Original Message- From: Joerg Hohwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:07 PM To: Maven D

Re: RE: Time to release the Release plugin?

2007-04-09 Thread Robert Kopco
It has been 11 month since the last release of the maven-release-plugin (2.0-beta-4). When will the next release of the plugin approximately be? There are 10 open issues. For a lot of issues patches have been provided: MRELEASE-128 MRELEASE-122 MRELEASE-116 MRELEASE-90 MRELEASE-91 MRELEASE-137

RE: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
At the end of the link quoted below: > a bridging api (which can reside within the same project - so can be hosted at apache) >will be used to access these LGPL stuff to clearly show its optional behaviour This is probably the simplest thing to do. Make a bridging API that sits at Mojo and th

Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, I was just looking around at Checkstyle and noticed that it is licensed as LGPL. Is this legit? I was under the impression that Apache soft ware could not directly use any LGPL or GPL licenses software... which the maven-checkstyle-plugin

Re: [vote] Attempt 2: Release 2.2-beta-1 of maven-assembly-plugin

2007-04-09 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Thanks John for this. Is there anything left to process the beta-1 release? Thanks, Stéphane On 4/5/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yeah, I'm sure I deployed with the wrong version of maven. :( I'll fix and redeploy. -john On 4/5/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I n

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.6

2007-04-09 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On 4/1/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The staging repository is here: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant- tasks-2.0.6/ The uber jar that people will want to try is here: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-ant-

Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL

2007-04-09 Thread Jason Dillon
Hey, I was just looking around at Checkstyle and noticed that it is licensed as LGPL. Is this legit? I was under the impression that Apache soft ware could not directly use any LGPL or GPL licenses software... which the maven-checkstyle-plugin is clearly doing. The README in the Checkstyl