RE: dependency on system library (java.library.path)

Nice powerpoint on that site. In less than 3 mins, I already know a ton about the plugin and how it works. -Original Message- From: Mark Donszelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 10:22 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: dependency on system library (java.

Re: dependency on system library (java.library.path)

Hi the freehep-nar-plugin does exactly what you describe. http://java.freehep.org/freehep-nar-plugin Regards Mark Donszelmann On Apr 6, 2007, at 5:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its probably better to zip the natives up and then use the zip file as the artifact, and then hook up support to

Re: dependency on system library (java.library.path)

Its probably better to zip the natives up and then use the zip file as the artifact, and then hook up support to extract them to some tmp dir for inclusion in the library path. Would also be nice to have a standard artifact type/ext to use for all share library types. And perhaps allow multi

mvn site not happy for archetype plugins

I was just trying to get a site for my archetype plugin, but its spitting out: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.maven.tools.plugin.generator.PluginXdocGenerator.execute (PluginXdocGenerator.java:46) at org.apache.maven.plugin.plugin.PluginReport.generatePluginD

Re: MRM-212 - work in progress ?

Sorry Nicolas, I didn't advance a lot on this problem. I'm always using at work my old snapshot of archiva because I have some others issues with the newest. I'll keep you informed if I have the time to work on it shortly. Arnaud On 04/04/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Arnaud H

Re: [VOTE] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-alpha-1 and maven-enforcer-rule-api 1.0-alpha-1

On 4/6/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Binding +5 (Brian, John, Jesse, Joakim, Jerome)...going by memory this time hopefully I got it right.. I have a visual memory and I think 80% of the PMC has names that start with J ;-) If you doublecheck the list, you may find out that the rat

RE: [VOTE] release maven-enforcer-plugin 1.0-alpha-1 and maven-enforcer-rule-api 1.0-alpha-1

Binding +5 (Brian, John, Jesse, Joakim, Jerome)...going by memory this time hopefully I got it right.. I have a visual memory and I think 80% of the PMC has names that start with J ;-) Non binding +1(000) Jason D (and apparently the users too) I will proceed with the release over the weekend. -

Re: viewvc link is broken in jira

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS --jason On Apr 6, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Is there someplace to write a jira to fix jira? -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:16 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: viewvc

RE: viewvc link is broken in jira

Is there someplace to write a jira to fix jira? -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:16 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: viewvc link is broken in jira I was viewing the commit log for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-7

RE: MSITE-138: showstopper still without solution?

Didn't we just do a JXR release? -Original Message- From: Joerg Hohwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:07 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: MSITE-138: showstopper still without solution? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Hohwiller sc

Re: dependency on system library (java.library.path)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Eric, > It should be a type, I agree. But if you are trying to keep moving, I just > drop the dll in the repo directory with the GWT jar. Thanks for the hint. This works for the GWT but NOT for a raw SWT project. > > Eric Regards Jörg > > On 4/

Re: dependency on system library (java.library.path)

It should be a type, I agree. But if you are trying to keep moving, I just drop the dll in the repo directory with the GWT jar. Eric On 4/6/07, Joerg Hohwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I have already used SWT and GWT together with mav

dependency on system library (java.library.path)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I have already used SWT and GWT together with maven. Both need native system libraries at some specific point. This causes trouble when running code (e.g. test-cases) with maven. Are there any plans to add dependencies with dll (or so) to j

Re: MSITE-138: showstopper still without solution?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Hohwiller schrieb: > Hi there, Hi again, for those who dig in the archives and hit this thread: The problem has been solved. Fixes for JXR and cobertura are not yet released but this is just a matter of time. For JXR a fixed version is already a

Re: [embedder] Retrieving available versions of an artifact

I opened MNG-2940 The only methods I see using MavenExecutionRequest is execute and readProjectWithDependencies. I don't see how useful would be using it as parameter. Same to return MavenExecutionResult, there's no project or reactor, and to encapsulate the possible exceptions, they are already

Re: M206 Regression: Build is broken

David J. M. Karlsen napisał(a): > Hi - I expirience the same - but only when running a multiproject: > > parent > -ejb-project (generating ejb and ejb-client) > -client-project (using ejb-client) > > If I try a multibuild it fails, if I cd into client-project and do mvn > clean install it succeed

Re: where to create issues for repo errors ?

invalid poms can be changed On 4/6/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've got an issue using jdom-b10. The POM on repo1.maven.org/maven2 is invalid : jdom-b10.pom : 4.0.0 jdom jdom- 10 Please note the "jdom-" artifactId Where to report an issue ? The "Maven Repository

[vote] Attempt 3: Release maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-1

Hi everyone, This is the third attempt, after fixing: * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-194 This bugfix actualy adds a new flag to the dependencySet, called useTransitiveFiltering, which allows you to enable filtering by matching a give

RE: [Vote] Move plugin site.xml up to Maven or Shared

> > I will make the changes and stage the main site before pushing it out. > > What are we doing with the links that are present on plugins but > not on > the main site? It seems to me that they should be the same in both > locations (either with or without). >I think it makes sense for them to

Re: where to create issues for repo errors ?

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV nicolas de loof a écrit : I've got an issue using jdom-b10. The POM on repo1.maven.org/maven2 is invalid : jdom-b10.pom : 4.0.0 jdom jdom- 10 Please note the "jdom-" artifactId Where to report an issue ? The "Maven Repository Management" project is n

where to create issues for repo errors ?

I've got an issue using jdom-b10. The POM on repo1.maven.org/maven2 is invalid : jdom-b10.pom : 4.0.0 jdom jdom- 10 Please note the "jdom-" artifactId Where to report an issue ? The "Maven Repository Management" project is not available on the JIRA select list for new issues. May I use M

Re: [Vote] Move plugin site.xml up to Maven or Shared

On 06/04/2007, at 7:28 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Binding: +6(Brian, John, Dennis, Brett, Jason, Emmanuel) Non-Binding: + 3(Andy,John T, Maria) John T is a PMC member - is there an out of date reference somewhere that doesn't list him? I will make the changes and stage the main site before