Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-26 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
+1 Fabrice. On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository: http://p

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-26 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel Jason van Zyl a écrit : Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/s

Re: [vote] release maven-source-plugin 2.0.3

2007-03-26 Thread Brett Porter
On 26/03/2007, at 3:38 PM, Stephane Nicoll wrote: Also, shouldn't trunk be reverted to 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT and the tag deleted since we've rejected the staged release? Correct. I thought Jason did it. I've done this now. - Brett -

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-26 Thread TslH
Is there somewhere a copy of the future site? Just to check the new templated site-files. Thanks, 2007/3/27, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-26 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Thanks, Stéphane On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-26 Thread Jason Dillon
Looks good to me... +1 --jason On Mar 26, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging r

[VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-2.0.6/ And the

[VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-2.0.6/ And the

RE: Maven classpath order

2007-03-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
What OS do you have? -Original Message- From: coding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:20 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: Maven classpath order Yeah.. This looks like an issue... I have tried running lots of time to see consistent behaviour in order but

RE: Maven classpath order

2007-03-26 Thread coding
Yeah.. This looks like an issue... I have tried running lots of time to see consistent behaviour in order but the order is different each time... my evn is : Maven 2.0.5 Jdk_1.5.0_11 Brian E. Fox wrote: > > I wonder if this is an OS thing? I've heard that before, but when I > experimented wit

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jorg Heymans
Jason van Zyl wrote: Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build first: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just wanted to get a little more feedback. Cocoon and Excalibur trunk build f

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Mar 07, at 2:30 PM 26 Mar 07, mraible wrote: All tests pass in AppFuse! Cool, thanks. With that we have a pretty good round up. I'm still poking around a bit and trying to throw some wrenches at the snapshot but it seems to be holding up. Jason. Matt Jason van Zyl-2 wrote:

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread mraible
All tests pass in AppFuse! Matt Jason van Zyl-2 wrote: > > Hi, > > Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a > build first: > > http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ > > Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just > wanted to get a

Maven Ant Tasks

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, To anyone interested in the Ant tasks I updated them for 2.0.6 and put them here: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ Give them a try, but I will release them with 2.0.6. I only did a cursory check but they appear to work fine. Jason. ---

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Mar 07, at 10:49 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: He shoots..He Scores! Everything looks good now. Is it0111 still valid if it wasn't finding this? I would say no. Nuke it. For now in the suite comment it out with a reason so we don't forget. For audit trail we should keep track o

RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
He shoots..He Scores! Everything looks good now. Is it0111 still valid if it wasn't finding this? -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:23 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check On 26 Mar 07, at 8:42

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Mar 07, at 8:42 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: Still broken, except I added the correct it0114 file this time so you can reproduce it. Sorry about that. Fixed, and 0114 now passes. Good test, my mistake. I put the p-u in the core container instead of the extension. Thanks for the

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Mar 07, at 9:52 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: At first glance, it does appear the same, except it works and my test and my project both fail or succeed similarly. Take a look at 0111 and make sure you're doing the same where the extension is installed first and then the project e

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Mar 07, at 9:50 AM 26 Mar 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is happening internally is that to mimic the 2.0.5 I am injecting p-u into all plugins and extensions. This is effectively what happens with 2.0.5 where the root classloader ha

RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
Jochen, I sent an email to the list earlier this weekend and started fixing plugins using the analyzer. The trouble is that we can't go back and fix already released plugins and not everyone will be able to update their plugins for various reasons. -Brian -Original Message- From: Jochen W

RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
At first glance, it does appear the same, except it works and my test and my project both fail or succeed similarly. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:47 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check On 26

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is happening internally is that to mimic the 2.0.5 I am injecting p-u into all plugins and extensions. This is effectively what happens with 2.0.5 where the root classloader has p-u version 1.1. If this is not done then plugins like the r

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Mar 07, at 8:42 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: Still broken, except I added the correct it0114 file this time so you can reproduce it. Sorry about that. Look at 0111 isn't that what you are doing? Loading a resource from an extension? 0111 is a checkstyle example. Jason. -

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 26 Mar 07, at 3:27 AM 26 Mar 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote: So far so good. Except that on a project I have this warning now: [WARNING] Artifact org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:jar:1.0.4:runtime retains local scope 'runtime' overriding broader scope 'compile' given by a dependenc

RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Brian E. Fox
Still broken, except I added the correct it0114 file this time so you can reproduce it. Sorry about that. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:42 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check Your stuff is fix

Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-4 AND maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2

2007-03-26 Thread Andrew Williams
+1 Andy On 25 Mar 2007, at 06:21, Brian E. Fox wrote: I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-4 and the shared maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2 that it depends on. Tags: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency- plug in-2.0-alpha-4/ http://svn.a

Re: [vote] release maven-source-plugin 2.0.3

2007-03-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 3/26/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I might help by rewriting the tests using the plugin-testing-harness. > (That would fit "quicker, unit-testing tests", doesn't it?) I would have thought that was what was there before - to be honest I haven't actually looked into the current

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-26 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Tested on big projects and complex plugins: works great! Fabrice. On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build first: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried

Re: [vote][m1] release modello plugin 1.0

2007-03-26 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 for both. Thanks, Stéphane On 3/26/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I think that it is the time to release the modello plugin for maven 1.x in version 1.0. This plugin allows to use modello (1.0-alpha-15) inside a maven 1.x build and is used to create our maven-model c

RE: Problem with Scope of Transitive Dependencies

2007-03-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Jason, Jason van Zyl wrote on Saturday, March 24, 2007 2:32 PM: [snip] >> 2.) The dao-impl Module depends on Hibernate, but Libraries that >> are used by Hibernate (e.g. cglib, asm and antlr) shall not be used >> directly in the dao-impl Module but shall only be used at runtime of >> tests.