+1
Fabrice.
On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The roadmap is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/
Staging repository:
http://p
+1
Emmanuel
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
Hi,
The roadmap is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/
Staging repository:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/s
On 26/03/2007, at 3:38 PM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Also, shouldn't trunk be reverted to 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT and the tag
deleted since we've rejected the staged release?
Correct. I thought Jason did it.
I've done this now.
- Brett
-
Is there somewhere a copy of the future site? Just to check the new
templated site-files.
Thanks,
2007/3/27, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
The roadmap is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache
+1
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The roadmap is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/
Staging repository:
Looks good to me... +1
--jason
On Mar 26, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The roadmap is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/
Staging r
Hi,
The roadmap is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/
Staging repository:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-2.0.6/
And the
Hi,
The roadmap is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/
Staging repository:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-2.0.6/
And the
What OS do you have?
-Original Message-
From: coding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:20 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: RE: Maven classpath order
Yeah.. This looks like an issue... I have tried running lots of time to
see consistent behaviour in order but
Yeah.. This looks like an issue... I have tried running lots of time to see
consistent behaviour in order but the order is different each time... my evn
is :
Maven 2.0.5
Jdk_1.5.0_11
Brian E. Fox wrote:
>
> I wonder if this is an OS thing? I've heard that before, but when I
> experimented wit
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build
first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just
wanted to get a little more feedback.
Cocoon and Excalibur trunk build f
On 26 Mar 07, at 2:30 PM 26 Mar 07, mraible wrote:
All tests pass in AppFuse!
Cool, thanks. With that we have a pretty good round up. I'm still
poking around a bit and trying to throw some wrenches at the snapshot
but it seems to be holding up.
Jason.
Matt
Jason van Zyl-2 wrote:
All tests pass in AppFuse!
Matt
Jason van Zyl-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
> build first:
>
> http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
>
> Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just
> wanted to get a
Hi,
To anyone interested in the Ant tasks I updated them for 2.0.6 and
put them here:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Give them a try, but I will release them with 2.0.6. I only did a
cursory check but they appear to work fine.
Jason.
---
On 26 Mar 07, at 10:49 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
He shoots..He Scores!
Everything looks good now.
Is it0111 still valid if it wasn't finding this?
I would say no. Nuke it. For now in the suite comment it out with a
reason so we don't forget. For audit trail we should keep track o
He shoots..He Scores!
Everything looks good now.
Is it0111 still valid if it wasn't finding this?
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:23 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
On 26 Mar 07, at 8:42
On 26 Mar 07, at 8:42 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Still broken, except I added the correct it0114 file this time so you
can reproduce it. Sorry about that.
Fixed, and 0114 now passes. Good test, my mistake. I put the p-u in
the core container instead of the extension. Thanks for the
On 26 Mar 07, at 9:52 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
At first glance, it does appear the same, except it works and my test
and my project both fail or succeed similarly.
Take a look at 0111 and make sure you're doing the same where the
extension is installed first and then the project e
On 26 Mar 07, at 9:50 AM 26 Mar 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is happening internally is that to mimic the 2.0.5 I am
injecting p-u into all plugins and extensions. This is effectively
what happens with 2.0.5 where the root classloader ha
Jochen,
I sent an email to the list earlier this weekend and started fixing
plugins using the analyzer. The trouble is that we can't go back and fix
already released plugins and not everyone will be able to update their
plugins for various reasons.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jochen W
At first glance, it does appear the same, except it works and my test
and my project both fail or succeed similarly.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:47 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
On 26
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is happening internally is that to mimic the 2.0.5 I am
injecting p-u into all plugins and extensions. This is effectively
what happens with 2.0.5 where the root classloader has p-u version
1.1. If this is not done then plugins like the r
On 26 Mar 07, at 8:42 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Still broken, except I added the correct it0114 file this time so you
can reproduce it. Sorry about that.
Look at 0111 isn't that what you are doing? Loading a resource from
an extension? 0111 is a checkstyle example.
Jason.
-
On 26 Mar 07, at 3:27 AM 26 Mar 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
So far so good. Except that on a project I have this warning now:
[WARNING]
Artifact org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:jar:1.0.4:runtime
retains local scope 'runtime' overriding broader scope 'compile'
given by a dependenc
Still broken, except I added the correct it0114 file this time so you
can reproduce it. Sorry about that.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
Your stuff is fix
+1
Andy
On 25 Mar 2007, at 06:21, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-4 and the shared
maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2 that it depends on.
Tags:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-
plug
in-2.0-alpha-4/
http://svn.a
On 3/26/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I might help by rewriting the tests using the plugin-testing-harness.
> (That would fit "quicker, unit-testing tests", doesn't it?)
I would have thought that was what was there before - to be honest I
haven't actually looked into the current
Tested on big projects and complex plugins: works great!
Fabrice.
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
build first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried
+1 for both.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 3/26/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I think that it is the time to release the modello plugin for maven 1.x in
version 1.0.
This plugin allows to use modello (1.0-alpha-15) inside a maven 1.x build
and is used to create our maven-model c
Hi Jason,
Jason van Zyl wrote on Saturday, March 24, 2007 2:32 PM:
[snip]
>> 2.) The dao-impl Module depends on Hibernate, but Libraries that
>> are used by Hibernate (e.g. cglib, asm and antlr) shall not be used
>> directly in the dao-impl Module but shall only be used at runtime of
>> tests.
30 matches
Mail list logo