I'm working on a plugin to automate a visual age tool that generates java
classes from cobol copybooks (ibm record framework). We still have a bunch
of applications that use this and everytime there is a copybook change
somebody needs to startup visual age and go through the gui to generate java
As part of the checking for 2.0.6, I ran dependency:analyze against the
plugins. We found that almost all plugins have undeclared dependencies.
Those with undeclared dependencies on plexus-utils will require a
workaround in maven itself to avoid hosing people. (Jason is going to
send a separate ema
On 23 Mar 07, at 5:49 PM 23 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
True. I don't see then why we wouldn't have a module for each shared
component like we do with plugins. Having a single shared project will
tend to get cluttered with issues and makes it harder to prepare for
releases etc.
I agree, this is
Want me to make a JIRA project for the shared components?
Jason.
On 23 Mar 07, at 5:49 PM 23 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
True. I don't see then why we wouldn't have a module for each shared
component like we do with plugins. Having a single shared project will
tend to get cluttered with issues
True. I don't see then why we wouldn't have a module for each shared
component like we do with plugins. Having a single shared project will
tend to get cluttered with issues and makes it harder to prepare for
releases etc.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
On 23/03/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it is likely that users will end up reporting the issues against
plugins that expose shared components (aka dependency-plugin and
dependency-analyzer) because the users don't know that the shared
components exist. For shared components
I think it is likely that users will end up reporting the issues against
plugins that expose shared components (aka dependency-plugin and
dependency-analyzer) because the users don't know that the shared
components exist. For shared components not exposed directly to the user
through any single plu
Hi there,
Where's the best place to raise JIRA issues against shared components?
The pom points to MNG, but there's no 'Shared Components' component
in that JIRA project. Would it be best to create a JIRA component or
a new JIRA project with components per shared component?
Cheers,
Mark
-
Thanks Daniel, that's right, Maven populates the dependencies lazily
so it's going to depend on what phases have you run.
On 3/23/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 23 March 2007 12:28, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> there's no order guaranteed afaik, the returned object is a Set
>
>
Hi
Answers inlined.
2007/3/23, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Sorry for being sluggish :)
On 21/03/2007, at 8:41 AM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do any one had the time to comment the sources and/or the first doco
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/maven-archetypeng ?
This looks very goo
On Friday 23 March 2007 12:28, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> there's no order guaranteed afaik, the returned object is a Set
>
> I think in 2.0.5 there was an attempt to make it follow the pom order
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1412
>
> getArtifacts returns all dependencies (including transitive
there's no order guaranteed afaik, the returned object is a Set
I think in 2.0.5 there was an attempt to make it follow the pom order
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1412
getArtifacts returns all dependencies (including transitive)
Set i'm gonna add some javadocs
On 3/23/07, Alin Dreghiciu
So it strips the .vm off the filtered file? That would probably work
just fine then. I wasn't aware of that part. Let me give it a try and
see if this will work.
Thanks,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:43 AM
To: dev@mave
Rob,
One more note:
The snapshot changes the behavior slightly. With the snapshot, only
resources ending in ".vm" are pushed through velocity. Thus, your xsd
and other files would not be filtered. If you name them foo.xsd.vm,
that would create the foo.xsd at process time with the values
Rob,
I just pushed a new snapshot (1.0-alpha-5) that fixes this.
Dan
On Friday 23 March 2007 11:05, Duda, Rob wrote:
> I had posted the attached message to the user list yesterday but
> decided to look at the source code myself to see if I could find a
> clue to the problem myself. Well I did
Hi guys,
Can someone enlight me and tell what will the method getArtifacts from
MavenProject return? What Artifacts?
Alin Dreghiciu
I had posted the attached message to the user list yesterday but decided
to look at the source code myself to see if I could find a clue to the
problem myself. Well I did.
I might be helpful to the people that might want to use this plug-in
that you mention in the documentation that if uses the f
On 23 Mar 07, at 7:18 AM 23 Mar 07, Thomas R. wrote:
Hello,
we are developing a very large project with a layered architecture.
We decided to use Maven (Version 2.0.4) in order to have a good
dependency-management. We are now facing the following problem with
transitive dependencies:
C
Hello,
we are developing a very large project with a layered architecture. We decided
to use Maven (Version 2.0.4) in order to have a good dependency-management. We
are now facing the following problem with transitive dependencies:
Consider following (simplified) example: We have a module DAO a
I assumed that there was a leak or something weird and that it would
get addressed.
I have certainly seen it compile and test fine without it before,
recently too, so I know it is possible...
Andy
On 22 Mar 2007, at 15:46, Thierry Lach wrote:
Any reason why this couldn't just be added perm
20 matches
Mail list logo
