On Mar 21, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I was using 2.2 of m-p-p which appears to be using qdox-1.6.1. I
also tried using 2.3-SNAPSHOT (whatever is up there in the m2-
snapshot-repo) and it looked like it was using qdox-1.6.1 as
well. Both behave the same way.
That should be the
On 21/03/2007, at 6:11 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I was using 2.2 of m-p-p which appears to be using qdox-1.6.1. I
also tried using 2.3-SNAPSHOT (whatever is up there in the m2-
snapshot-repo) and it looked like it was using qdox-1.6.1 as well.
Both behave the same way.
That should be the
On Mar 20, 2007, at 11:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I was under the impression the latest release had updated to qdox
and it could deal with it (where it contains annotations, not using
them for the mojo parameters themselves obviously).
What version of the plugin plugin are you using, and wh
Hi,
On 3/21/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephane, Piotr,
Thanks for taking this on and putting together this proposal. As we discussed
previously, I have significant issues with the current war plugin, so much that
we have been stuck using a patched version of 2.0-beta-2 becaus
I was under the impression the latest release had updated to qdox and
it could deal with it (where it contains annotations, not using them
for the mojo parameters themselves obviously).
What version of the plugin plugin are you using, and what version of
qdox does it drag in?
On 21/03/200
Is there anyway to get the maven-plugin-plugin to work with a module
that contains 1.5 annotations?
When I try to build when the packaging is 'maven-plugin',
'plugin:descriptor' pukes up:
[INFO] [plugin:descriptor]
[INFO] Using 2 extractors.
[INFO] Applying extractor for language: java
[IN
Stephane, Piotr,
Thanks for taking this on and putting together this proposal. As we discussed
previously, I have significant issues with the current war plugin, so much that
we have been stuck using a patched version of 2.0-beta-2 because anything newer
breaks my build. I believe that your pro
Hi Guys,
I finished up an RPM Factory Plugin recently (At least the first pass)
and it can be found here in case anyone is interested:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/sandbox/oersoy/rpm.factory.all
There is a eclipse documentation plugin guide for installing and using here:
https://
Vote Tally:
Binding: +3 (Stephane, John, Emmanuel)
NonBinding:+2 (Dan,Brian)
I will proceed with the release.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:32 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alp
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Personally I have not problem adding extra execution per thing
I want to enforce. IMO that is much clearer and simplifies
the implementing mojo.
Potentially yes, but it's also a performance issue invoking the plugin
extra times. In my situation,
>Personally I have not problem adding extra execution per thing
>I want to enforce. IMO that is much clearer and simplifies
>the implementing mojo.
Potentially yes, but it's also a performance issue invoking the plugin
extra times. In my situation, I have about 100+ modules that would be
doin
On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Come, on - enforcer:enforce just sounds cool.
Ya, but its not terribly descriptive :-P
I actually started in this direction, and the code to check both
versions was nearly identical. After I thought about it for a while, I
thought that these t
Hi,
Do any one had the time to comment the sources and/or the first doco
http://mojo.codehaus.org/maven-archetypeng ?
Here is a proposition of refactored descriptor which attemps
to introduce: the use of attributes, the possibility to copy files,
and customised template groups (root, 1->3° level
Ah, well...that wasn't completely clear. I assumed your comments last night
were in lieu of the appointment you had made to review it. Sorry for the
mixup.
-john
On 3/20/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the record, I wasn't adding a +1 on IRC, but agreeing that it's
lazy consens
For the record, I wasn't adding a +1 on IRC, but agreeing that it's
lazy consensus based (so yes - go ahead). I still intend to review
when time permits :)
- Brett
On 21/03/2007, at 8:04 AM, John Casey wrote:
Brett added his +1 on IRC last night, making the total:
Binding: +3 (John, Jason
Brett added his +1 on IRC last night, making the total:
Binding: +3 (John, Jason, Brett)
Non-Binding: +2 (Brian, Milos)
I'm going to start the merge now.
-john
On 3/20/07, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
very cool.
+1
Milos
On 3/20/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
Vote results:
Binding: +4 (Emmanuel, John, Stephane, Jason)
Nonbinding: +6 (Daniel,Milos,Jerome,Andy,Mark,Brian)
I will proceed with the release,
Thanks.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Maven Developers Lis
Nvm. A single character makes a big difference when it's http/https ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:26 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] (take 2) Release Maven PMD Plugin 2.2
I tried to update the pom with
I tried to update the pom with my info, but don't have permissions.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:57 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release Maven PMD Plugin 2.2
On 20 Mar 07, at 12:40 PM 20 Ma
On 20 Mar 07, at 12:40 PM 20 Mar 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Hmm... Arnaud isn't on the team list:
http://maven.apache.org/team-list.html
OK. Thanks. Still need one for remote-resources. (according to
team-list) I think that list needs updating.
Most likely. The definitive list:
maven-
Hmm... Arnaud isn't on the team list:
http://maven.apache.org/team-list.html
OK. Thanks. Still need one for remote-resources. (according to
team-list) I think that list needs updating.
Thanks!
Dan
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 12:33, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> You have 3 already. Arnaud, John
You have 3 already. Arnaud, John, and myself.
Jason.
On 20 Mar 07, at 11:20 AM 20 Mar 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Any chance of getting another PMC member to look at this and vote
on it.
Also on the maven-remote-resources-plugin vote as well. Both only
have
2 binding PMC votes.
Thanks!
Dan
+1
On 3/20/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any chance of getting another PMC member to look at this and vote on it.
Also on the maven-remote-resources-plugin vote as well. Both only have
2 binding PMC votes.
-
T
Any chance of getting another PMC member to look at this and vote on it.
Also on the maven-remote-resources-plugin vote as well. Both only have
2 binding PMC votes.
Thanks!
Dan
On Friday 16 March 2007 13:11, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Ok, Take 2. The regression in the URL handling is fixed (a
+1
On 3/19/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Emmanuel
Brian E. Fox a écrit :
> I'd like to release the alpha 1 version of this shared component. The
> analyzer scans through your class files and produces a list of
> dependencies declared but not used, dependencies used but no
+1
On 3/20/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 19 Mar 07, at 6:43 PM 19 Mar 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin-2.3.
>
> There is only one issue fixed for this release, but it's an
> important one. It adds support for @since tags for moj
+1
On 3/20/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 16 Mar 07, at 1:11 PM 16 Mar 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Ok, Take 2. The regression in the URL handling is fixed (and unit
> test
> added).
>
> I'd like to release version 2.2 of the PMD plugin. It's been over 8
> months since t
+1
On 16 Mar 07, at 1:11 PM 16 Mar 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Ok, Take 2. The regression in the URL handling is fixed (and unit
test
added).
I'd like to release version 2.2 of the PMD plugin. It's been over 8
months since the last release and this is a fairly significant
improvement addres
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 20 Mar 07, at 7:57 AM 20 Mar 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
On 19/03/2007, at 11:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
You mean in a separate subproject of doxia. I can change the
directory so how about:
doxia
doxia-site (sub project)
doxia-book (sub project)
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 20 Mar 07, at 7:45 AM 20 Mar 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After working with it a little this week I would like to propose to
make MNG-1577 behavior introduced the default. Builds are completely
and totally unpredictable without this behavior.
Arne,
Do you have any plans for ClearCase UCM?
Jason.
On 20 Mar 07, at 8:56 AM 20 Mar 07, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
ArneD a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,
after SCM-287 has been applied, I still see the following problem
with the
Maven/Continuum and ClearCase integration.
The ClearCase implementati
On 20 Mar 07, at 7:57 AM 20 Mar 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
On 19/03/2007, at 11:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
You mean in a separate subproject of doxia. I can change the
directory so how about:
doxia
doxia-site (sub project)
doxia-book (sub project)
These sound fine to
On 20 Mar 07, at 7:45 AM 20 Mar 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After working with it a little this week I would like to propose
to make MNG-1577 behavior introduced the default. Builds are
completely and totally unpredictable without this behavior. The
behavior in 2.
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
ArneD a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,
after SCM-287 has been applied, I still see the following problem with
the
Maven/Continuum and ClearCase integration.
The ClearCase implementation of the checkout command for ClearCase
creates a
ClearCase snapshot view. Such a snap
+1
On 19 Mar 07, at 6:43 PM 19 Mar 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin-2.3.
There is only one issue fixed for this release, but it's an
important one. It adds support for @since tags for mojo parameters.
This is an important improvement to our plugin doc
ArneD a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,
after SCM-287 has been applied, I still see the following problem with the
Maven/Continuum and ClearCase integration.
The ClearCase implementation of the checkout command for ClearCase creates a
ClearCase snapshot view. Such a snaphsot view is very similiar to a C
Wendy Smoak wrote:
A recent version of Archiva is logging everything about incoming
requests, but I don't see anything about the requests it makes out to
proxied repositories.
After deleting junit from both the local repository and the
proxy-of-central 'releases' repo served by Archiva, I see th
Come, on - enforcer:enforce just sounds cool.
I actually started in this direction, and the code to check both
versions was nearly identical. After I thought about it for a while, I
thought that these two where likely to be used very frequently together.
Instead of forcing someone to bind the plug
Brett Porter wrote:
On 19/03/2007, at 11:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
You mean in a separate subproject of doxia. I can change the directory
so how about:
doxia
doxia-site (sub project)
doxia-book (sub project)
These sound fine to me.
Me too. What is the most important aspect of Doxia giv
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After working with it a little this week I would like to propose to make
MNG-1577 behavior introduced the default. Builds are completely and
totally unpredictable without this behavior. The behavior in 2.0.5 is
fundamentally broken. To are totally prey to any dependen
Hi Emmanuel,
after SCM-287 has been applied, I still see the following problem with the
Maven/Continuum and ClearCase integration.
The ClearCase implementation of the checkout command for ClearCase creates a
ClearCase snapshot view. Such a snaphsot view is very similiar to a CVS or
Subversion ch
+1
Dan
On Monday 19 March 2007 18:43, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin-2.3.
>
> There is only one issue fixed for this release, but it's an important
> one. It adds support for @since tags for mojo parameters. This is an
> important improvement to our plug
On 20/03/2007, at 6:45 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
ok, I am changing my tune on the remaining 11 issues, I want this
thing released asap so we have something concrete to get moving on.
The 11 issues are functionally no real different then a lot of the
ones in the -2 jira so I am thinking we just
Could you consider MRM-153 in the roadmap ? The attached patch works for
me.
I'd describe the requirement as
"Serve default layout content to M1 clients"
and
"Handle relocation meta-data for M1 clients"
2007/3/20, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 20/03/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROT
+1 of course!
Stéphane
On 3/18/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-3
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-plug
in-2.0-alpha-3/
Staged at:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository
Chan
On 3/20/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After 2.0.6 I intend to take another pass at the ITs and do the
invoking/verification decoupling in the Verifier, merge all our
invoker and verification plugins/tools, enable an embedded/forking
invoker (using one of the 5 we have) and wire it
+1
Stéphane
On 3/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin-2.3.
There is only one issue fixed for this release, but it's an important
one. It adds support for @since tags for mojo parameters. This is an
important improvement to our plugin do
47 matches
Mail list logo
