Which wagon-ssh version fixed the permission problem when deploying?

2007-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
... or is this problem still unfixed? I still see that some folks `mvn deploy` and end up with files which are not g+w, even though they have in settings.xml for each server: 664 775 Looks like wagon-ssh 1.0-beta-1 and 1.0-beta-2 both have this problem. The only fix that I have foun

RE: site failures using -Preporting

2007-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
Bingo, clearing my repo did the trick. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:46 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: site failures using -Preporting Brian, Two things to try: 1) Remove your local copy of the checks

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
FYI, I've created a JIRA issue with the patch here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINSTALL-37 I'd appreciate it if this could get applied and new snaps deployed... :-) --jason On Mar 14, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I quickly mocked up the forceVersion with the groovy-maven

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
I quickly mocked up the forceVersion with the groovy-maven-plugin and it works very well. Here is the g-m-p pom: http://rifers.org/paste/jdillon/show/3939 One of the src/it poms: http://rifers.org/paste/jdillon/show/3938 And the change to InstallMojo: http://rifers.org/paste/jd

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads

2007-03-14 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (27 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MAVENUPLOAD-1420Upload Struts 2 Spring Web Flow Plugin 1.0.3 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1420 MAVENUPLOAD-1419Upload FreeMarker 2.3.9

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism

2007-03-14 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (39 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MEV-506 SiteMesh 2.3 is missing a POM http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-506 MEV-504 Jetty 5.1.10 and 5.1.11 missing poms http://jira

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
How does a test repository help? I still need to configure in my src/ it/*/pom.xml the version of the plugin I'm testing. Maybe I don't understand what you mean by "test repositories". I just want my src/it/*/pom.xml to *always* use the right version of the plugin (ie. that which was just co

RE: version range question

2007-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
Done. I fixed the problem and added the tests to a branch described here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2876 Since it's very core (or maybe not if it's not really used) I'd like someone to bless it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ca

Re: site failures using -Preporting

2007-03-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
Brian, Two things to try: 1) Remove your local copy of the checkstyle plugin and force it to re-download. 2) Rebuild checkstyle based on trunk. I think I fixed this on Monday. Dan On Wednesday 14 March 2007 20:15, Brian E. Fox wrote: > I'm getting this on several plugins when generating

RE: version range question

2007-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
I added tests, I think the answer is that this method is only used in one other place inside of maven itself. I guess it's just plain broken. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Sanchez Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:06 AM To: Maven D

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 3 Mar 07, at 11:06 PM 3 Mar 07, Jason Dillon wrote: Any comments on adding a 'forceVersion' param to the maven-install- plugin, which will for all artifacts (including attached) to be installed with the given version? Why not just use test repositories? You can hack this with a setting

RE: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
I guess I don't see any harm in this, although I wouldn't add it only to make tests of plugins work. That's a bigger issue that should be solved correctly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:52 PM

RE: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom

2007-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
So I can remove this code from my pom then: META-INF false ${basedir}

site failures using -Preporting

2007-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'm getting this on several plugins when generating the site with -Preporting: [INFO] Generate "Checkstyle" report. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

Re: forceVersion for maven-install-plugin?

2007-03-14 Thread Jason Dillon
Hrm... still no comments about this :-( I'm going to try and whip up a patch for the maven-install-plugin to implement this. And then hopefully someone will have a comment, or maybe it will just get committed for the next release. The alternative is to write yet another plugin to do this... whi

Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom

2007-03-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 18:59, Brian E. Fox wrote: > Is there a way to include notice and license files in the jars by > default? Well, we could pull the remote-resources plugin out of the release profile and put it right in the build/plugins section of the pom to force it to always run. Ho

RE: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom

2007-03-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
Is there a way to include notice and license files in the jars by default? -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 4:15 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom On Wednesday 14 March 2007

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/14/07, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem is that it uses the Verifier to test. The Verifier uses the plugin from the local repo, not the current project. First, mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true, then mvn test and it'll work. I noticed this today.. there's about

Re: maven code style - eclipse

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Dan Tran wrote: What do you mean by "check it with checkstyle first"?? I mean that checkstyle should be the ultimate source of our code formats, and I want code formatted with the eclipse codestyle to be checked by checkstyle to see if it's perfect. Any how, I would rather getting it from o

Re: Test failures in maven-source-plugin

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
The problem is that it uses the Verifier to test. The Verifier uses the plugin from the local repo, not the current project. First, mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true, then mvn test and it'll work. I noticed this today.. there's about 4 plugins that won't install cleanly because of this. -

Re: ApacheCon?

2007-03-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I'l be there - it's in my country so how can I not go? :) I'm looking forward to meeting you in person (and others ofcourse). -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is speaking. Anyone want to get together there? I'm currently working o

Re: ApacheCon?

2007-03-14 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Finally going to meet Robert :) Mvgr, Martin robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 3/13/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is >> speaking. Anyone want to get together there? > > i'll be there over the queens day weeken

Re: ApacheCon?

2007-03-14 Thread Arnaud Bailly
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is > speaking. Anyone want to get together there? > Hello, I think I will be there to follow your presentation and training and other apache topics. Not sure yet as there are budget iss

Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom

2007-03-14 Thread Carlos Sanchez
go for it ;) On 3/14/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:05, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > so we use the latest apache parent If we do, we should update to the latest gpg and remote resource things as well. Specifically gpg so we don't have to have passphrases b

Re: [Archetypes] plugin proposition

2007-03-14 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
The first draft of the doco is updated (same place) with explains on mojos and internal design. But this doesn't prevent from reading the sources :-) (for more design information). My next step is now sorting the todo list and enhance with suggestions. Jason gave me karma on the current archety

Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom

2007-03-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:05, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > so we use the latest apache parent If we do, we should update to the latest gpg and remote resource things as well. Specifically gpg so we don't have to have passphrases burned into our settings.xml. -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Eng

[VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom

2007-03-14 Thread Carlos Sanchez
so we use the latest apache parent -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

Re: JPOX 1.1.7 ?

2007-03-14 Thread Jesse McConnell
server 8.2.3-1 jdbc version: 8.2-504.jdbc3 (and jdbc4) so I sure hope its not a matter of being that tight :) I'll monkey around a bit more, right now I am just making sure it works with the internal derby jesse On 3/14/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I ran into something similar

Re: JPOX 1.1.7 ?

2007-03-14 Thread Thierry Lach
I ran into something similar some time back. Check to make sure that you're using the same version of the postgres jdbc jar as you are the postgres database. The example on http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Database+Configuration uses the 8.0 jar. On 3/14/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PR

Eclipse IDE plugin page broken

2007-03-14 Thread Jim Bethancourt
Hi all, The link for the Eclipse Plugin is broken on http://maven.apache.org/eclipse-plugin.html Could someone please fix it? Thanks, Jim

Re: JPOX 1.1.7 ?

2007-03-14 Thread Jesse McConnell
I am getting issues with starting continuum with the jpox 1.1.7 and postgres myself different stacks though g: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "PROJECTGROUP_BUILDDEFINITIONS_pkey" for table "PROJECTGROUP_BUILDDEFINITIONS" 2007-03-14 12:48:37,539 [main] WARN General

Re: Maven for C/C++/C#

2007-03-14 Thread Dan Tran
checkout cbuilds-maven-plugin and native-maven-plugin at http://mojo.codehaus.org/ On 3/14/07, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure about the C/C++ plugins, but for C# you can check out NMaven under incubation (http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven). Shane On 3/14/07, Yorke, Par

Re: Maven for C/C++/C#

2007-03-14 Thread Shane Isbell
I'm not sure about the C/C++ plugins, but for C# you can check out NMaven under incubation (http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven). Shane On 3/14/07, Yorke, Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are their any plans to develop plug-ins that will enable maven to manage projects based on C/C++/C#?

Maven for C/C++/C#

2007-03-14 Thread Yorke, Parise
Are their any plans to develop plug-ins that will enable maven to manage projects based on C/C++/C#?

Re: Preparing Maven SCM 1.0

2007-03-14 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : Trygve Laugstøl a écrit : Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven 1.0 in next weeks. As you can see, I updated jira for this version. Before to do it, we need to fix some major issues with some providers. [snip] The is

Re: JPOX 1.1.7 ?

2007-03-14 Thread Thierry Lach
Yeah, that was my thought also. On 3/14/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: have you tried it with postgres outside of jboss? I want to narrow down the factors here On 3/14/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's right. I knew that patch for transaction levels didn't

Re: JPOX 1.1.7 ?

2007-03-14 Thread Jesse McConnell
have you tried it with postgres outside of jboss? I want to narrow down the factors here On 3/14/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's right. I knew that patch for transaction levels didn't solve it on its own, so my hopes got up with the mention of JPOX 1.1.7 and postgres last w

Re: JPOX 1.1.7 ?

2007-03-14 Thread Thierry Lach
That's right. I knew that patch for transaction levels didn't solve it on its own, so my hopes got up with the mention of JPOX 1.1.7 and postgres last week. On 3/13/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I set the transaction lvls to READ_COMMITTED as well, so that didn't fix you either

Nag: MNG-2854

2007-03-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, may I ask for feedback or application of MNG-2854? This patch attempts to fix the issue that jar files get rebuilt every time, thus fixing a serious performance issue. Thanks, Jochen -- Emacs 22 will support MacOS and CygWin. It is not yet decided, whether these will be used to run Emacs o