Re: Archiva Database future.

2007-03-11 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Databases in Archiva. I need *desperately* to create a proper database for Archiva. Relying on the Lucene database for all things in Archiva is not cutting it. But I'm waffling on the database O/RM technology to use. Here some Archiva requirements for the O/RM db technolo

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12 Mar 07, at 12:22 AM 12 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote: On 3/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11 Mar 07, at 9:48 PM 11 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote: [...] Some days ago we talked about trying to not expose the internal maven > plexus-utils to the projects it builds.

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 3/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11 Mar 07, at 9:48 PM 11 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote: [...] Some days ago we talked about trying to not expose the internal maven > plexus-utils to the projects it builds. > I have done work on trunk and am working with Torsten to f

Re: Does the MavenEmbedder Support Use of a Custom Life Cycle Configuration?

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
The only activity for the embedder is on trunk. I have yet to merge anything back because to be useful in an embedded situation many changes have been made. All the IDE integration pieces are using trunk and the first official and usable release will most likely be 2.1-alpha-1. Jason. On

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Mar 07, at 9:48 PM 11 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote: On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've got three issues left to close out for 2.0.6 and two of them I will finish tomorrow and the snapshot weirdness I will fix wed/thurs. But if anyone wants to try what's there

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Mar 07, at 6:31 PM 11 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote: This was something I specifically wanted to check, so I'll look more closely in the next couple of days, but it sounds like a deal breaker for a .0.x release. Not hard to put back in and we agreed that the behavior, however defect

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Mar 07, at 4:02 PM 11 Mar 07, Ralph Goers wrote: Jason, Well, I view the behavior of the patch as being correct, but since the override flag has been removed from the pom it breaks backward compatibility with previous 2.0 verisons - which is why I added the flag in the first place.

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Ralph Goers
The email from Jason below explains why it was done this way. I believe this discussion should have happened on the dev list. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: This was something I specifically wanted to check, so I'll look more closely in the next couple of days, but it sounds like a deal breaker f

Re: Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Mar 07, at 5:57 PM 11 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote: On 11/03/2007, at 9:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote: Hi, (first of all, please forgive my low-level in english) I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make mistake, ther

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've got three issues left to close out for 2.0.6 and two of them I will finish tomorrow and the snapshot weirdness I will fix wed/thurs. But if anyone wants to try what's there so far it's here: Jason, Some days ago we talked about

Does the MavenEmbedder Support Use of a Custom Life Cycle Configuration?

2007-03-11 Thread Shane Isbell
Does the MavenEmbedder support the use of custom life cycle configurations? To explain a little of my situation: I have a components.xmlfile configuring phases for the component org.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.LifecycleMapping (using 'library' as a role hint). I have a class invoking the MavenE

scm urls in the archiva-site pom

2007-03-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
The pom for archiva-site has this: scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/trunk/ scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/trunk/ http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/archiva/trunk/ It does help with the generated source-repository page [1] but it causes

Re: Releasing JXR 1.1

2007-03-11 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
On 3/5/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 04/03/2007, at 4:05 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > I found a couple of other bugs while testing, that I also fixed. I > feel pretty much done now. Snapshots have been deployed so that'll > give it some testing. cool, thanks for this! > >> H

Re: Trouble w/ the Plexus app and on Tomcat r516446

2007-03-11 Thread Brett Porter
Emmanuel last changed the container - anything to do with that? On 11/03/2007, at 1:04 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/11/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This occurs when you use an older database that was on jpox 1.1.4, and run it under the new stuff, unfortunately. You probably need

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Brett Porter
This was something I specifically wanted to check, so I'll look more closely in the next couple of days, but it sounds like a deal breaker for a .0.x release. - Brett On 11/03/2007, at 4:02 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: Jason, Well, I view the behavior of the patch as being correct, but since

Re: Releasing JXR 1.1

2007-03-11 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/03/2007, at 3:20 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: I'm just about done with moving stuff in SVN and adjusting the poms accordingly. I did not change the groupId for either jxr or the jxr- plugin. Let me know if I should. Should be fine. The sites for jxr and jxr-plugin looks good, but I w

Re: Archiva Database future.

2007-03-11 Thread Brett Porter
On 09/03/2007, at 7:39 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Databases in Archiva. I need *desperately* to create a proper database for Archiva. Relying on the Lucene database for all things in Archiva is not cutting it. I'd like to investigate this statement further yet. I certainly believe it, bu

Re: Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/03/2007, at 9:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote: Hi, (first of all, please forgive my low-level in english) I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release. Isn

Re: [Archetypes] plugin proposition

2007-03-11 Thread Brett Porter
My basic feedback would be similar to Jason's. Key requirements: - backwards compatibility with existing archetypes is a definite requirement - existing goal names need to continue to work, even if they are deprecated - if it's being designed from the ground up, it should have new standards

Re: Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Ralph Goers
Jason, Well, I view the behavior of the patch as being correct, but since the override flag has been removed from the pom it breaks backward compatibility with previous 2.0 verisons - which is why I added the flag in the first place. However, if anyone complains about this it should be point

Re: svn commit: r517025 - /maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml

2007-03-11 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Thanks Wendy! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Mar 11 14:51:15 2007 New Revision: 517025 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517025 Log: Removed maven-jxr-plugin which was moved to maven/jxr/trunk in r516931 Modified: maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml Modified: maven

Re: Releasing JXR 1.1

2007-03-11 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I'm just about done with moving stuff in SVN and adjusting the poms accordingly. I did not change the groupId for either jxr or the jxr-plugin. Let me know if I should. The sites for jxr and jxr-plugin looks good, but I want to do some more checking, then I'll publish the one for jxr. When i

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-tools 2.1 (take 2)

2007-03-11 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 3/11/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Trying this vote once more. This time with staging. This release is a preparation for a new release of the maven-plugin-plugin. Changes: - Add support for new annotations: @since for mojos and @implementation for parameters - Remove p

Re: Trouble w/ the Plexus app and on Tomcat r516446

2007-03-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/11/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This occurs when you use an older database that was on jpox 1.1.4, and run it under the new stuff, unfortunately. You probably need to start over with your users database. Thanks. That fixed it for Tomcat (once I figured out where the databa

New global repo observer/manager roles (Re: svn commit: r512961, r512963)

2007-03-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=512963 Log: Add Global Repository Observer Role URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=512961 Log: added a Global Repository Manager role Thanks! This is something I asked for a w

Re: Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The script I checked in. The eternal magic of sed. Using $ {project.version} to prepare for putting the POM in a Velocity context as "project". Okay, r516945 looks like it's just for individual pages. I think Tom was asking about publishing

Re: Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Mar 07, at 10:27 AM 11 Mar 07, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just started trying to track project references and replacing them with a variable that can be interpolated. Until the site plugin works to interpolate project information this will

Re: Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just started trying to track project references and replacing them with a variable that can be interpolated. Until the site plugin works to interpolate project information this will do. Do you mean using ${version} in apt and having it rep

Re: Mapping strategy for libraries in the WAR/EAR plugin

2007-03-11 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Hi, On 3/7/07, Eric Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/7/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am starting using the WAR plugin extensively as a user this time and > I'd like your insight about the addition of a mapping strategy in the > WAR/EAR plugin. > > The worst

Re: Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote: Hi, (first of all, please forgive my low-level in english) I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release. Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency?

Re: Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/11/07, TslH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release. Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency? ... Can I suggest to apply the same kind of branches policy for ma

Maven website

2007-03-11 Thread TslH
Hi, (first of all, please forgive my low-level in english) I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release. Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency? Here an example: there's still some outdated informa

Moving toward 2.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I've got three issues left to close out for 2.0.6 and two of them I will finish tomorrow and the snapshot weirdness I will fix wed/thurs. But if anyone wants to try what's there so far it's here: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ I imagine the MNG-1577 might spark some discu

Re: [maven2 build branches/maven-2.0.x - FAILED - update] Sun Mar 11 03:45:00 GMT 2007

2007-03-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Mar 07, at 12:38 AM 11 Mar 07, Ralph Goers wrote: Some things seem to be missing. ManagedVersionMap doesn't seem to be present. I also don't see the change to model.mdo to allow overrides to be enabled. Yup, it's all in now. Jason. Brett Porter wrote: The recent commits for MNG

Re: [maven2 build branches/maven-2.0.x - FAILED - update] Sun Mar 11 03:45:00 GMT 2007

2007-03-11 Thread Ralph Goers
Some things seem to be missing. ManagedVersionMap doesn't seem to be present. I also don't see the change to model.mdo to allow overrides to be enabled. Brett Porter wrote: The recent commits for MNG-1577 seem to have broken the build. On 11/03/2007, at 3:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log