Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Databases in Archiva.
I need *desperately* to create a proper database for Archiva. Relying on
the Lucene database for all things in Archiva is not cutting it.
But I'm waffling on the database O/RM technology to use.
Here some Archiva requirements for the O/RM db technolo
On 12 Mar 07, at 12:22 AM 12 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
On 3/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11 Mar 07, at 9:48 PM 11 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
[...]
Some days ago we talked about trying to not expose the internal maven
> plexus-utils to the projects it builds.
On 3/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11 Mar 07, at 9:48 PM 11 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
[...]
Some days ago we talked about trying to not expose the internal maven
> plexus-utils to the projects it builds.
>
I have done work on trunk and am working with Torsten to f
The only activity for the embedder is on trunk. I have yet to merge
anything back because to be useful in an embedded situation many
changes have been made. All the IDE integration pieces are using
trunk and the first official and usable release will most likely be
2.1-alpha-1.
Jason.
On
On 11 Mar 07, at 9:48 PM 11 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've got three issues left to close out for 2.0.6 and two of them I
will finish tomorrow and the snapshot weirdness I will fix wed/thurs.
But if anyone wants to try what's there
On 11 Mar 07, at 6:31 PM 11 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
This was something I specifically wanted to check, so I'll look
more closely in the next couple of days, but it sounds like a deal
breaker for a .0.x release.
Not hard to put back in and we agreed that the behavior, however
defect
On 11 Mar 07, at 4:02 PM 11 Mar 07, Ralph Goers wrote:
Jason,
Well, I view the behavior of the patch as being correct, but since
the override flag has been removed from the pom it breaks backward
compatibility with previous 2.0 verisons - which is why I added the
flag in the first place.
The email from Jason below explains why it was done this way. I believe
this discussion should have happened on the dev list.
Ralph
Brett Porter wrote:
This was something I specifically wanted to check, so I'll look more
closely in the next couple of days, but it sounds like a deal breaker
f
On 11 Mar 07, at 5:57 PM 11 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 11/03/2007, at 9:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote:
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, ther
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've got three issues left to close out for 2.0.6 and two of them I
will finish tomorrow and the snapshot weirdness I will fix wed/thurs.
But if anyone wants to try what's there so far it's here:
Jason,
Some days ago we talked about
Does the MavenEmbedder support the use of custom life cycle configurations?
To explain a little of my situation: I have a components.xmlfile
configuring phases for the component
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.LifecycleMapping (using 'library' as a
role hint). I have a class invoking the MavenE
The pom for archiva-site has this:
scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/trunk/
scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/trunk/
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/archiva/trunk/
It does help with the generated source-repository page [1] but it
causes
On 3/5/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 04/03/2007, at 4:05 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> I found a couple of other bugs while testing, that I also fixed. I
> feel pretty much done now. Snapshots have been deployed so that'll
> give it some testing.
cool, thanks for this!
>
>> H
Emmanuel last changed the container - anything to do with that?
On 11/03/2007, at 1:04 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 3/11/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This occurs when you use an older database that was on jpox 1.1.4,
and run it under the new stuff, unfortunately. You probably need
This was something I specifically wanted to check, so I'll look more
closely in the next couple of days, but it sounds like a deal breaker
for a .0.x release.
- Brett
On 11/03/2007, at 4:02 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Jason,
Well, I view the behavior of the patch as being correct, but since
On 11/03/2007, at 3:20 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
I'm just about done with moving stuff in SVN and adjusting the poms
accordingly. I did not change the groupId for either jxr or the jxr-
plugin. Let me know if I should.
Should be fine.
The sites for jxr and jxr-plugin looks good, but I w
On 09/03/2007, at 7:39 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Databases in Archiva.
I need *desperately* to create a proper database for Archiva.
Relying on
the Lucene database for all things in Archiva is not cutting it.
I'd like to investigate this statement further yet. I certainly
believe it, bu
On 11/03/2007, at 9:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote:
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release.
Isn
My basic feedback would be similar to Jason's.
Key requirements:
- backwards compatibility with existing archetypes is a definite
requirement
- existing goal names need to continue to work, even if they are
deprecated
- if it's being designed from the ground up, it should have new
standards
Jason,
Well, I view the behavior of the patch as being correct, but since the
override flag has been removed from the pom it breaks backward
compatibility with previous 2.0 verisons - which is why I added the flag
in the first place.
However, if anyone complains about this it should be point
Thanks Wendy!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Mar 11 14:51:15 2007
New Revision: 517025
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=517025
Log:
Removed maven-jxr-plugin which was moved to maven/jxr/trunk in r516931
Modified:
maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: maven
I'm just about done with moving stuff in SVN and adjusting the poms
accordingly. I did not change the groupId for either jxr or the
jxr-plugin. Let me know if I should.
The sites for jxr and jxr-plugin looks good, but I want to do some more
checking, then I'll publish the one for jxr.
When i
On 3/11/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Trying this vote once more. This time with staging.
This release is a preparation for a new release of the
maven-plugin-plugin.
Changes:
- Add support for new annotations: @since for mojos and @implementation
for parameters
- Remove p
On 3/11/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This occurs when you use an older database that was on jpox 1.1.4,
and run it under the new stuff, unfortunately. You probably need to
start over with your users database.
Thanks. That fixed it for Tomcat (once I figured out where the
databa
On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=512963
Log:
Add Global Repository Observer Role
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=512961
Log:
added a Global Repository Manager role
Thanks! This is something I asked for a w
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The script I checked in. The eternal magic of sed. Using $
{project.version} to prepare for putting the POM in a Velocity
context as "project".
Okay, r516945 looks like it's just for individual pages. I think Tom
was asking about publishing
On 11 Mar 07, at 10:27 AM 11 Mar 07, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just started trying to
track project references and replacing them with a variable that can
be interpolated. Until the site plugin works to interpolate project
information this will
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just started trying to
track project references and replacing them with a variable that can
be interpolated. Until the site plugin works to interpolate project
information this will do.
Do you mean using ${version} in apt and having it rep
Hi,
On 3/7/07, Eric Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am starting using the WAR plugin extensively as a user this time and
> I'd like your insight about the addition of a mapping strategy in the
> WAR/EAR plugin.
>
> The worst
On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote:
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release.
Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency?
On 3/11/07, TslH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release.
Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency?
...
Can I suggest to apply the same kind of branches policy for ma
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release.
Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency?
Here an example: there's still some outdated informa
Hi,
I've got three issues left to close out for 2.0.6 and two of them I
will finish tomorrow and the snapshot weirdness I will fix wed/thurs.
But if anyone wants to try what's there so far it's here:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
I imagine the MNG-1577 might spark some discu
On 11 Mar 07, at 12:38 AM 11 Mar 07, Ralph Goers wrote:
Some things seem to be missing. ManagedVersionMap doesn't seem to
be present. I also don't see the change to model.mdo to allow
overrides to be enabled.
Yup, it's all in now.
Jason.
Brett Porter wrote:
The recent commits for MNG
Some things seem to be missing. ManagedVersionMap doesn't seem to be
present. I also don't see the change to model.mdo to allow overrides to
be enabled.
Brett Porter wrote:
The recent commits for MNG-1577 seem to have broken the build.
On 11/03/2007, at 3:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log
35 matches
Mail list logo